塞马鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病的时间-疗效关系:基于模型的 Meta 分析。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ke Zhang, Aiping Zhao, Zhen Wang, Kaihe Ye, Zhaosi Xu, Xiao Gong, Guanghu Zhu
{"title":"塞马鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病的时间-疗效关系:基于模型的 Meta 分析。","authors":"Ke Zhang, Aiping Zhao, Zhen Wang, Kaihe Ye, Zhaosi Xu, Xiao Gong, Guanghu Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s40262-024-01449-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to quantify the efficacy of subcutaneous once-weekly semaglutide in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, a modified maximum effect (E<sub>max</sub>) model including rebound effects was built using model-based meta-analysis with change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin as the efficacy endpoint. This was combined with the covariate model to form a final model, and then theoretical values of E<sub>max</sub> and time to reach 50% of E<sub>max</sub> (ET<sub>50</sub>) were obtained for each dose. Model fit and prediction were assessed using goodness-of-fit plots and visual prediction checking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E<sub>max</sub> and ET<sub>50</sub> were influenced by the proportion of males and the baseline values, respectively. There was no evidence of a placebo effect with semaglutide. The efficacy of other doses became more significant over time, and a rebound effect was observed after maximum efficacy, at a rate of 0.018. Simulation of the typical efficacy at the different doses yielded a maximum efficacy of -1.58% with 0.5 mg and a maximum efficacy of -1.87% with 1 mg. In addition, the six simulated doses (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg) showed a dose-dependent relationship between dose and efficacy except for 0.4 mg and 0.8 mg. A higher dose would result in greater efficacy and a faster onset of action.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of semaglutide in glucose control was investigated using the model-based meta-analysis method, which yields new insights into the treatment of T2DM with semaglutide.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-Efficacy Relationship of Semaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ke Zhang, Aiping Zhao, Zhen Wang, Kaihe Ye, Zhaosi Xu, Xiao Gong, Guanghu Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40262-024-01449-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to quantify the efficacy of subcutaneous once-weekly semaglutide in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, a modified maximum effect (E<sub>max</sub>) model including rebound effects was built using model-based meta-analysis with change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin as the efficacy endpoint. This was combined with the covariate model to form a final model, and then theoretical values of E<sub>max</sub> and time to reach 50% of E<sub>max</sub> (ET<sub>50</sub>) were obtained for each dose. Model fit and prediction were assessed using goodness-of-fit plots and visual prediction checking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E<sub>max</sub> and ET<sub>50</sub> were influenced by the proportion of males and the baseline values, respectively. There was no evidence of a placebo effect with semaglutide. The efficacy of other doses became more significant over time, and a rebound effect was observed after maximum efficacy, at a rate of 0.018. Simulation of the typical efficacy at the different doses yielded a maximum efficacy of -1.58% with 0.5 mg and a maximum efficacy of -1.87% with 1 mg. In addition, the six simulated doses (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg) showed a dose-dependent relationship between dose and efficacy except for 0.4 mg and 0.8 mg. A higher dose would result in greater efficacy and a faster onset of action.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of semaglutide in glucose control was investigated using the model-based meta-analysis method, which yields new insights into the treatment of T2DM with semaglutide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacokinetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacokinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01449-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01449-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们的目的是量化皮下注射每周一次的塞马鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效:在对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库进行文献检索的基础上,利用基于模型的荟萃分析建立了包含反弹效应的修正最大效应(Emax)模型,并将糖化血红蛋白与基线相比的变化作为疗效终点。该模型与协变量模型相结合形成最终模型,然后得出每个剂量的最大效应理论值和达到最大效应 50%的时间(ET50)。使用拟合优度图和目测预测检查对模型的拟合和预测进行评估:Emax和ET50分别受男性比例和基线值的影响。没有证据表明使用塞马鲁肽会产生安慰剂效应。随着时间的推移,其他剂量的疗效变得更加显著,并且在达到最大疗效后出现了反弹效应,反弹率为 0.018。模拟不同剂量的典型疗效得出,0.5 毫克的最大疗效为-1.58%,1 毫克的最大疗效为-1.87%。此外,六种模拟剂量(0、0.1、0.2、0.5、1 和 2 毫克)显示,除 0.4 毫克和 0.8 毫克外,剂量与疗效之间呈剂量依赖关系。剂量越大,疗效越好,起效越快:结论:采用基于模型的荟萃分析方法研究了塞马鲁肽对血糖控制的疗效,为塞马鲁肽治疗T2DM提供了新的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-Efficacy Relationship of Semaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Our objective was to quantify the efficacy of subcutaneous once-weekly semaglutide in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over time.

Methods: Based on a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, a modified maximum effect (Emax) model including rebound effects was built using model-based meta-analysis with change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin as the efficacy endpoint. This was combined with the covariate model to form a final model, and then theoretical values of Emax and time to reach 50% of Emax (ET50) were obtained for each dose. Model fit and prediction were assessed using goodness-of-fit plots and visual prediction checking.

Results: Emax and ET50 were influenced by the proportion of males and the baseline values, respectively. There was no evidence of a placebo effect with semaglutide. The efficacy of other doses became more significant over time, and a rebound effect was observed after maximum efficacy, at a rate of 0.018. Simulation of the typical efficacy at the different doses yielded a maximum efficacy of -1.58% with 0.5 mg and a maximum efficacy of -1.87% with 1 mg. In addition, the six simulated doses (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg) showed a dose-dependent relationship between dose and efficacy except for 0.4 mg and 0.8 mg. A higher dose would result in greater efficacy and a faster onset of action.

Conclusion: The efficacy of semaglutide in glucose control was investigated using the model-based meta-analysis method, which yields new insights into the treatment of T2DM with semaglutide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信