通过超低通量全基因组测序检测不同癌症类型中循环肿瘤DNA的预后价值。系统综述和患者生存数据荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Miguel Sogbe, Daniel Aliseda, Paloma Sangro, Manuel de la Torre-Aláez, Bruno Sangro, Josepmaria Argemi
{"title":"通过超低通量全基因组测序检测不同癌症类型中循环肿瘤DNA的预后价值。系统综述和患者生存数据荟萃分析。","authors":"Miguel Sogbe, Daniel Aliseda, Paloma Sangro, Manuel de la Torre-Aláez, Bruno Sangro, Josepmaria Argemi","doi":"10.1093/carcin/bgae073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) (≤0.5× coverage) of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a low-cost promising tool to assess circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction. This meta-analysis aims to summarize the current findings and comprehensively investigate the prognostic value of baseline ctDNA detected by ULP-WGS in solid tumors. A systematic review was carried out by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify eligible studies conducted between January 2014 and January 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised studies with reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes across therapy-naïve patients with different solid tumors. All patients underwent baseline ULP-WGS of plasma cfDNA and were categorized as ctDNA positive (tumor fraction ≥10%) or negative (tumor fraction <10%). A one-stage meta-analysis was performed using patient-level survival data reconstructed from published articles. A Cox proportional hazards model with shared frailty was used to assess the difference in survival between arms. A total of six studies, comprising 620 patients (367 negative ctDNA and 253 positive ctDNA), were included in the OS analysis, while five studies, involving 349 patients (212 negative ctDNA and 137 positive ctDNA), were included in the PFS analysis. The meta-analysis showed that patients with baseline positive ctDNA had a significantly higher risk of death (HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 2.01-3.36) and disease progression (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.05) compared to those with negative ctDNA. The presence of a positive ctDNA at baseline is associated with increased risk of death and progression in patients with same stage cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9446,"journal":{"name":"Carcinogenesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in different cancer types detected by ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing. A systematic review and patient-level survival data meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Sogbe, Daniel Aliseda, Paloma Sangro, Manuel de la Torre-Aláez, Bruno Sangro, Josepmaria Argemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/carcin/bgae073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) (≤0.5× coverage) of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a low-cost promising tool to assess circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction. This meta-analysis aims to summarize the current findings and comprehensively investigate the prognostic value of baseline ctDNA detected by ULP-WGS in solid tumors. A systematic review was carried out by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify eligible studies conducted between January 2014 and January 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised studies with reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes across therapy-naïve patients with different solid tumors. All patients underwent baseline ULP-WGS of plasma cfDNA and were categorized as ctDNA positive (tumor fraction ≥10%) or negative (tumor fraction <10%). A one-stage meta-analysis was performed using patient-level survival data reconstructed from published articles. A Cox proportional hazards model with shared frailty was used to assess the difference in survival between arms. A total of six studies, comprising 620 patients (367 negative ctDNA and 253 positive ctDNA), were included in the OS analysis, while five studies, involving 349 patients (212 negative ctDNA and 137 positive ctDNA), were included in the PFS analysis. The meta-analysis showed that patients with baseline positive ctDNA had a significantly higher risk of death (HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 2.01-3.36) and disease progression (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.05) compared to those with negative ctDNA. The presence of a positive ctDNA at baseline is associated with increased risk of death and progression in patients with same stage cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carcinogenesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carcinogenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgae073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carcinogenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgae073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血浆无细胞DNA(cfDNA)超低通量全基因组测序(ULP-WGS)(覆盖率≤0.5×)已成为评估循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)比例的一种低成本、有前景的工具。本荟萃分析旨在总结目前的研究结果,全面研究 ULP-WGS 检测到的实体瘤基线 ctDNA 的预后价值。通过检索PubMed/MEDLINE和Scopus数据库,对2014年1月至2024年1月期间进行的符合条件的研究进行了系统综述。纳入标准包括报告了不同实体瘤的治疗无效患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)结果的研究。所有患者都接受了血浆 cfDNA 基线 ULP-WGS,并被分为 ctDNA 阳性(肿瘤比例≥10%)或阴性(肿瘤比例≥10%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in different cancer types detected by ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing. A systematic review and patient-level survival data meta-analysis.

Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) (≤0.5× coverage) of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a low-cost promising tool to assess circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction. This meta-analysis aims to summarize the current findings and comprehensively investigate the prognostic value of baseline ctDNA detected by ULP-WGS in solid tumors. A systematic review was carried out by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify eligible studies conducted between January 2014 and January 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised studies with reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes across therapy-naïve patients with different solid tumors. All patients underwent baseline ULP-WGS of plasma cfDNA and were categorized as ctDNA positive (tumor fraction ≥10%) or negative (tumor fraction <10%). A one-stage meta-analysis was performed using patient-level survival data reconstructed from published articles. A Cox proportional hazards model with shared frailty was used to assess the difference in survival between arms. A total of six studies, comprising 620 patients (367 negative ctDNA and 253 positive ctDNA), were included in the OS analysis, while five studies, involving 349 patients (212 negative ctDNA and 137 positive ctDNA), were included in the PFS analysis. The meta-analysis showed that patients with baseline positive ctDNA had a significantly higher risk of death (HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 2.01-3.36) and disease progression (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.05) compared to those with negative ctDNA. The presence of a positive ctDNA at baseline is associated with increased risk of death and progression in patients with same stage cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
95
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Carcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research is a multi-disciplinary journal that brings together all the varied aspects of research that will ultimately lead to the prevention of cancer in man. The journal publishes papers that warrant prompt publication in the areas of Biology, Genetics and Epigenetics (including the processes of promotion, progression, signal transduction, apoptosis, genomic instability, growth factors, cell and molecular biology, mutation, DNA repair, genetics, etc.), Cancer Biomarkers and Molecular Epidemiology (including genetic predisposition to cancer, and epidemiology), Inflammation, Microenvironment and Prevention (including molecular dosimetry, chemoprevention, nutrition and cancer, etc.), and Carcinogenesis (including oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in carcinogenesis, therapy resistance of solid tumors, cancer mouse models, apoptosis and senescence, novel therapeutic targets and cancer drugs).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信