{"title":"基于针灸在癌症综合治疗中的随机假对照研究,了解安慰剂和安慰剂反应。","authors":"Anna Efverman","doi":"10.1177/15347354241300068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Since placebo and nocebo-responses during acupuncture therapy are rarely studied in clinical contexts, the objective was to investigate placebo and nocebo-responses in a clinical context through comparing positive and negative side-effects between genuine and sham acupuncture, and to identify factors modifying placebo and nocebo-responses. <b>Methods:</b> Patients reported positive side-effects (non-intended positive effects) or negative side-effects (non-intended negative effects) of genuine (penetrating; n = 109) or sham (telescopic non-penetrating; n = 106) acupuncture during 5 weeks of chemoradiation for cancer. <b>Results:</b> The genuine and the sham acupuncture group reported rather similar frequencies of positive <i>(P</i>-values .223-.800) or negative (<i>P</i>-values .072-1.0) side-effects: relaxation 59%/57% of the patients, improved mood 46%/38%, improved sleep 38%/38%, pain-reduction 36%/28%, tiredness 42%/42%, feeling cold 37%/31%, sweating 23%/21%, and dizziness 20%/12%. Positive side-effects occurred in 79% of patients who highly believed acupuncture to be effective, compared to in 0% of patients who did not believe. Other factors associated with placebo-response were female sex (<i>P</i> = .042), anxious mood (<i>P</i> = .007), depressed mood (<i>P</i> = .018), and blinding-success (<i>P</i> = .033). Factors associated with nocebo response were female sex (<i>P</i> = .049), younger age (<i>P</i> = .010), and needle-induced pain (<i>P</i> = .014). Sham-treated patients experiencing positive side-effects experienced better quality of life at the end of the treatment period (mean, m 64 on a scale 0-100 millimetres, Standard Deviation, SD, ±26.1 mm) than those who did not (m 48 ± 25.5 mm), <i>P</i> = .048 (adjusted for other characteristics). <b>Conclusions:</b> Clinically significant levels of placebo and nocebo effects commonly occurred during acupuncture therapy in integrative cancer care and this paper identified factors modifying these responses. This implicates that acupuncture-delivering therapists striving to maximize placebo-responses and minimize nocebo-responses may considering strengthen the patient's treatment expectations, and offer a pleasant, pain-free, acupuncture treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13734,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","volume":"23 ","pages":"15347354241300068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Placebo and Nocebo Responses Based on a Randomized Sham-Controlled Study on Acupuncture in Integrative Cancer Care.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Efverman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347354241300068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Since placebo and nocebo-responses during acupuncture therapy are rarely studied in clinical contexts, the objective was to investigate placebo and nocebo-responses in a clinical context through comparing positive and negative side-effects between genuine and sham acupuncture, and to identify factors modifying placebo and nocebo-responses. <b>Methods:</b> Patients reported positive side-effects (non-intended positive effects) or negative side-effects (non-intended negative effects) of genuine (penetrating; n = 109) or sham (telescopic non-penetrating; n = 106) acupuncture during 5 weeks of chemoradiation for cancer. <b>Results:</b> The genuine and the sham acupuncture group reported rather similar frequencies of positive <i>(P</i>-values .223-.800) or negative (<i>P</i>-values .072-1.0) side-effects: relaxation 59%/57% of the patients, improved mood 46%/38%, improved sleep 38%/38%, pain-reduction 36%/28%, tiredness 42%/42%, feeling cold 37%/31%, sweating 23%/21%, and dizziness 20%/12%. Positive side-effects occurred in 79% of patients who highly believed acupuncture to be effective, compared to in 0% of patients who did not believe. Other factors associated with placebo-response were female sex (<i>P</i> = .042), anxious mood (<i>P</i> = .007), depressed mood (<i>P</i> = .018), and blinding-success (<i>P</i> = .033). Factors associated with nocebo response were female sex (<i>P</i> = .049), younger age (<i>P</i> = .010), and needle-induced pain (<i>P</i> = .014). Sham-treated patients experiencing positive side-effects experienced better quality of life at the end of the treatment period (mean, m 64 on a scale 0-100 millimetres, Standard Deviation, SD, ±26.1 mm) than those who did not (m 48 ± 25.5 mm), <i>P</i> = .048 (adjusted for other characteristics). <b>Conclusions:</b> Clinically significant levels of placebo and nocebo effects commonly occurred during acupuncture therapy in integrative cancer care and this paper identified factors modifying these responses. This implicates that acupuncture-delivering therapists striving to maximize placebo-responses and minimize nocebo-responses may considering strengthen the patient's treatment expectations, and offer a pleasant, pain-free, acupuncture treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Cancer Therapies\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"15347354241300068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569494/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Cancer Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241300068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241300068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Placebo and Nocebo Responses Based on a Randomized Sham-Controlled Study on Acupuncture in Integrative Cancer Care.
Objective: Since placebo and nocebo-responses during acupuncture therapy are rarely studied in clinical contexts, the objective was to investigate placebo and nocebo-responses in a clinical context through comparing positive and negative side-effects between genuine and sham acupuncture, and to identify factors modifying placebo and nocebo-responses. Methods: Patients reported positive side-effects (non-intended positive effects) or negative side-effects (non-intended negative effects) of genuine (penetrating; n = 109) or sham (telescopic non-penetrating; n = 106) acupuncture during 5 weeks of chemoradiation for cancer. Results: The genuine and the sham acupuncture group reported rather similar frequencies of positive (P-values .223-.800) or negative (P-values .072-1.0) side-effects: relaxation 59%/57% of the patients, improved mood 46%/38%, improved sleep 38%/38%, pain-reduction 36%/28%, tiredness 42%/42%, feeling cold 37%/31%, sweating 23%/21%, and dizziness 20%/12%. Positive side-effects occurred in 79% of patients who highly believed acupuncture to be effective, compared to in 0% of patients who did not believe. Other factors associated with placebo-response were female sex (P = .042), anxious mood (P = .007), depressed mood (P = .018), and blinding-success (P = .033). Factors associated with nocebo response were female sex (P = .049), younger age (P = .010), and needle-induced pain (P = .014). Sham-treated patients experiencing positive side-effects experienced better quality of life at the end of the treatment period (mean, m 64 on a scale 0-100 millimetres, Standard Deviation, SD, ±26.1 mm) than those who did not (m 48 ± 25.5 mm), P = .048 (adjusted for other characteristics). Conclusions: Clinically significant levels of placebo and nocebo effects commonly occurred during acupuncture therapy in integrative cancer care and this paper identified factors modifying these responses. This implicates that acupuncture-delivering therapists striving to maximize placebo-responses and minimize nocebo-responses may considering strengthen the patient's treatment expectations, and offer a pleasant, pain-free, acupuncture treatment.
期刊介绍:
ICT is the first journal to spearhead and focus on a new and growing movement in cancer treatment. The journal emphasizes scientific understanding of alternative medicine and traditional medicine therapies, and their responsible integration with conventional health care. Integrative care includes therapeutic interventions in diet, lifestyle, exercise, stress care, and nutritional supplements, as well as experimental vaccines, chrono-chemotherapy, and other advanced treatments. Contributors are leading oncologists, researchers, nurses, and health-care professionals.