基于侵入压力和阻力预测血管内治疗后脑灌注流量的计算方法。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Xi Zhao , Li Bai , Raynald , Jie He , Bin Han , Xiaotong Xu , Zhongrong Miao , Dapeng Mo
{"title":"基于侵入压力和阻力预测血管内治疗后脑灌注流量的计算方法。","authors":"Xi Zhao ,&nbsp;Li Bai ,&nbsp;Raynald ,&nbsp;Jie He ,&nbsp;Bin Han ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Xu ,&nbsp;Zhongrong Miao ,&nbsp;Dapeng Mo","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Predicting post-operative flow is essential for assessing the risk of adverse events in cerebrovascular stenosis patients following endovascular treatment (EVT). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the CFD simulation model in predicting post-operative velocity, flow and pressure distal to a stenosis, based on cerebrovascular microcirculatory resistance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The patient-specific models of the extracranial and intracranial arteries were reconstructed. The cerebrovascular microcirculatory resistance was applied to estimate post-operative blood velocity and flow rates. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to evaluate the correlation and agreement between CFD calculations and transcranial Doppler (TCD) measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a strong correlation between CFD- and TCD-based mean velocities (<em>r</em> = 0.7733; <em>P</em> = 0.0002), with volume flow measured by both methods also showing robust correlation (<em>r</em> = 0.8621; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Additionally, agreement was found between mean velocities determined by CFD simulation and those estimated by TCD (<em>P</em> = 0.2446, mean difference −4.2089; limits of agreement -11.5764 to 3.1586). However, agreement between volume flow from CFD simulations and TCD was less consistent (<em>P</em> = 0.0387, mean difference -0.3272, limits of agreement -0.9276 to 0.2731).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The computational method used in this study enables the prediction of hemodynamic changes and offers valuable support in tailoring treatment strategies for cerebrovascular stenosis lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 108510"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A computational method to predict cerebral perfusion flow after endovascular treatment based on invasive pressure and resistance\",\"authors\":\"Xi Zhao ,&nbsp;Li Bai ,&nbsp;Raynald ,&nbsp;Jie He ,&nbsp;Bin Han ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Xu ,&nbsp;Zhongrong Miao ,&nbsp;Dapeng Mo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Predicting post-operative flow is essential for assessing the risk of adverse events in cerebrovascular stenosis patients following endovascular treatment (EVT). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the CFD simulation model in predicting post-operative velocity, flow and pressure distal to a stenosis, based on cerebrovascular microcirculatory resistance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The patient-specific models of the extracranial and intracranial arteries were reconstructed. The cerebrovascular microcirculatory resistance was applied to estimate post-operative blood velocity and flow rates. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to evaluate the correlation and agreement between CFD calculations and transcranial Doppler (TCD) measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a strong correlation between CFD- and TCD-based mean velocities (<em>r</em> = 0.7733; <em>P</em> = 0.0002), with volume flow measured by both methods also showing robust correlation (<em>r</em> = 0.8621; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Additionally, agreement was found between mean velocities determined by CFD simulation and those estimated by TCD (<em>P</em> = 0.2446, mean difference −4.2089; limits of agreement -11.5764 to 3.1586). However, agreement between volume flow from CFD simulations and TCD was less consistent (<em>P</em> = 0.0387, mean difference -0.3272, limits of agreement -0.9276 to 0.2731).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The computational method used in this study enables the prediction of hemodynamic changes and offers valuable support in tailoring treatment strategies for cerebrovascular stenosis lesions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260724005030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260724005030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:预测术后血流对于评估脑血管狭窄患者接受血管内治疗(EVT)后发生不良事件的风险至关重要。本研究旨在评估基于脑血管微循环阻力的 CFD 模拟模型在预测术后狭窄远端速度、流量和压力方面的准确性:方法:重建了颅外动脉和颅内动脉的患者特异性模型。应用脑血管微循环阻力估算术后血流速度和流速。采用皮尔逊相关分析和布兰德-阿尔特曼分析评估 CFD 计算与经颅多普勒(TCD)测量之间的相关性和一致性:基于 CFD 和 TCD 的平均速度之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.7733;P = 0.0002),两种方法测量的血流量也显示出很强的相关性(r = 0.8621;P < 0.0001)。此外,CFD 模拟确定的平均速度与 TCD 估算的平均速度之间也存在一致性(P = 0.2446,平均差 -4.2089;一致性范围 -11.5764 至 3.1586)。然而,CFD 模拟和 TCD 估算的体积流量之间的一致性较差(P = 0.0387,平均差 -0.3272,一致性范围 -0.9276 至 0.2731):本研究中使用的计算方法可以预测血流动力学变化,为制定脑血管狭窄病变的治疗策略提供有价值的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A computational method to predict cerebral perfusion flow after endovascular treatment based on invasive pressure and resistance

Background and objective

Predicting post-operative flow is essential for assessing the risk of adverse events in cerebrovascular stenosis patients following endovascular treatment (EVT). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the CFD simulation model in predicting post-operative velocity, flow and pressure distal to a stenosis, based on cerebrovascular microcirculatory resistance.

Methods

The patient-specific models of the extracranial and intracranial arteries were reconstructed. The cerebrovascular microcirculatory resistance was applied to estimate post-operative blood velocity and flow rates. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to evaluate the correlation and agreement between CFD calculations and transcranial Doppler (TCD) measurements.

Results

There was a strong correlation between CFD- and TCD-based mean velocities (r = 0.7733; P = 0.0002), with volume flow measured by both methods also showing robust correlation (r = 0.8621; P < 0.0001). Additionally, agreement was found between mean velocities determined by CFD simulation and those estimated by TCD (P = 0.2446, mean difference −4.2089; limits of agreement -11.5764 to 3.1586). However, agreement between volume flow from CFD simulations and TCD was less consistent (P = 0.0387, mean difference -0.3272, limits of agreement -0.9276 to 0.2731).

Conclusions

The computational method used in this study enables the prediction of hemodynamic changes and offers valuable support in tailoring treatment strategies for cerebrovascular stenosis lesions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
135 days
期刊介绍: To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信