晶体中蛋白质的质子化状态如何?恒定 pH 值分子动力学模拟的启示

IF 2.8 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Noora Aho*, Gerrit Groenhof and Pavel Buslaev*, 
{"title":"晶体中蛋白质的质子化状态如何?恒定 pH 值分子动力学模拟的启示","authors":"Noora Aho*,&nbsp;Gerrit Groenhof and Pavel Buslaev*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c0594710.1021/acs.jpcb.4c05947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >X-ray crystallography is an important technique to determine the positions of atoms in a protein crystal. However, because the native environment in which proteins function, is not a crystal, but a solution, it is not a priori clear if the crystal structure represents the functional form of the protein. Because the protein structure and function often depend critically on the pH, the question arises whether proton affinities are affected by crystallization. X-ray diffraction usually does not reveal protons, which makes it difficult to experimentally measure p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> shifts in crystals. Here, we investigate whether this challenge can be addressed by performing in silico titration with constant pH molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We compare the computed p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values of proteins between solution and crystal environment and analyze these differences in the context of molecular interactions. For the proteins considered in this work, p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> shifts were mostly found for residues at the crystal interfaces, where the environment is more apolar in the crystal than in water. Although convergence was an obstacle, our simulations suggest that in principle it is possible to apply constant pH MD to protein crystals routinely and assess the effect of crystallization on protein function more systematically than with standard MD simulations. We also highlight technical challenges that need to be addressed to make MD simulations of crystals more reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":60,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","volume":"128 45","pages":"11124–11133 11124–11133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is the Protonation State of Proteins in Crystals? Insights from Constant pH Molecular Dynamics Simulations\",\"authors\":\"Noora Aho*,&nbsp;Gerrit Groenhof and Pavel Buslaev*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c0594710.1021/acs.jpcb.4c05947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >X-ray crystallography is an important technique to determine the positions of atoms in a protein crystal. However, because the native environment in which proteins function, is not a crystal, but a solution, it is not a priori clear if the crystal structure represents the functional form of the protein. Because the protein structure and function often depend critically on the pH, the question arises whether proton affinities are affected by crystallization. X-ray diffraction usually does not reveal protons, which makes it difficult to experimentally measure p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> shifts in crystals. Here, we investigate whether this challenge can be addressed by performing in silico titration with constant pH molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We compare the computed p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values of proteins between solution and crystal environment and analyze these differences in the context of molecular interactions. For the proteins considered in this work, p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> shifts were mostly found for residues at the crystal interfaces, where the environment is more apolar in the crystal than in water. Although convergence was an obstacle, our simulations suggest that in principle it is possible to apply constant pH MD to protein crystals routinely and assess the effect of crystallization on protein function more systematically than with standard MD simulations. We also highlight technical challenges that need to be addressed to make MD simulations of crystals more reliable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":60,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B\",\"volume\":\"128 45\",\"pages\":\"11124–11133 11124–11133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c05947\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c05947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

X 射线晶体学是确定蛋白质晶体中原子位置的重要技术。然而,由于蛋白质发挥作用的原生环境不是晶体,而是溶液,因此晶体结构是否代表蛋白质的功能形式并不先验。由于蛋白质的结构和功能通常与 pH 值密切相关,因此就出现了质子亲和性是否会受到结晶影响的问题。X 射线衍射通常不能显示质子,因此很难通过实验测量晶体中 pKa 的偏移。在此,我们研究是否可以通过恒定 pH 值分子动力学(MD)模拟进行硅滴定来解决这一难题。我们比较了蛋白质在溶液和晶体环境中的计算 pKa 值,并结合分子相互作用分析了这些差异。对于本研究中的蛋白质,pKa 值的偏移主要出现在晶体界面的残基上,因为晶体中的环境比水中的环境更具极性。虽然收敛是一个障碍,但我们的模拟表明,原则上可以对蛋白质晶体常规应用恒定 pH MD,并比标准 MD 模拟更系统地评估结晶对蛋白质功能的影响。我们还强调了需要解决的技术难题,以使晶体的 MD 模拟更加可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What Is the Protonation State of Proteins in Crystals? Insights from Constant pH Molecular Dynamics Simulations

What Is the Protonation State of Proteins in Crystals? Insights from Constant pH Molecular Dynamics Simulations

X-ray crystallography is an important technique to determine the positions of atoms in a protein crystal. However, because the native environment in which proteins function, is not a crystal, but a solution, it is not a priori clear if the crystal structure represents the functional form of the protein. Because the protein structure and function often depend critically on the pH, the question arises whether proton affinities are affected by crystallization. X-ray diffraction usually does not reveal protons, which makes it difficult to experimentally measure pKa shifts in crystals. Here, we investigate whether this challenge can be addressed by performing in silico titration with constant pH molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We compare the computed pKa values of proteins between solution and crystal environment and analyze these differences in the context of molecular interactions. For the proteins considered in this work, pKa shifts were mostly found for residues at the crystal interfaces, where the environment is more apolar in the crystal than in water. Although convergence was an obstacle, our simulations suggest that in principle it is possible to apply constant pH MD to protein crystals routinely and assess the effect of crystallization on protein function more systematically than with standard MD simulations. We also highlight technical challenges that need to be addressed to make MD simulations of crystals more reliable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
965
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An essential criterion for acceptance of research articles in the journal is that they provide new physical insight. Please refer to the New Physical Insights virtual issue on what constitutes new physical insight. Manuscripts that are essentially reporting data or applications of data are, in general, not suitable for publication in JPC B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信