Colleen C Schreyer, Jessica K Salwen-Deremer, Janelle W Coughlin, Caroline Sanicola, Chelsea A Taylor, Irina A Vanzhula, Mary K Martinelli, Genna F Hymowitz
{"title":"评估对寻求代谢和减肥手术的患者进行睡眠评估的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Colleen C Schreyer, Jessica K Salwen-Deremer, Janelle W Coughlin, Caroline Sanicola, Chelsea A Taylor, Irina A Vanzhula, Mary K Martinelli, Genna F Hymowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 80% of patients seeking metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) report disturbance in sleep function. No studies have assessed the psychometric properties of sleep measures in MBS samples.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed the reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in a large sample of patients seeking MBS.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measures of sleep (PSQI and ISI) and psychological functioning, including the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), were administered presurgically. Internal consistency was assessed with mean inter-item correlations and item-total correlations. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) based on models identified in the literature and by measuring convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 939) were primarily female (83.4%) with a mean age of 41.7 (SD = 11.5) years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 47.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (SD = 8.5). CFAs indicated excellent fit for 2-factor solutions for the PSQI and ISI. Internal consistency for the PSQI and ISI were acceptable. Convergent validity was demonstrated by large correlations between the PSQI and ISI (r = .80, p < .001), and moderate correlation between the PSQI, ISI, and QIDS (rs > .50, ps < .001). The PSQI and ISI were moderately correlated with QIDS items assessing sleep function (P < .001), but correlations with items assessing appetite change were small (r < .10), demonstrating good discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support the reliability and validity of the PSQI and ISI for patients undergoing MBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94216,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the reliability and validity of sleep assessments in patients seeking metabolic and bariatric surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Colleen C Schreyer, Jessica K Salwen-Deremer, Janelle W Coughlin, Caroline Sanicola, Chelsea A Taylor, Irina A Vanzhula, Mary K Martinelli, Genna F Hymowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 80% of patients seeking metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) report disturbance in sleep function. No studies have assessed the psychometric properties of sleep measures in MBS samples.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed the reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in a large sample of patients seeking MBS.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measures of sleep (PSQI and ISI) and psychological functioning, including the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), were administered presurgically. Internal consistency was assessed with mean inter-item correlations and item-total correlations. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) based on models identified in the literature and by measuring convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 939) were primarily female (83.4%) with a mean age of 41.7 (SD = 11.5) years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 47.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (SD = 8.5). CFAs indicated excellent fit for 2-factor solutions for the PSQI and ISI. Internal consistency for the PSQI and ISI were acceptable. Convergent validity was demonstrated by large correlations between the PSQI and ISI (r = .80, p < .001), and moderate correlation between the PSQI, ISI, and QIDS (rs > .50, ps < .001). The PSQI and ISI were moderately correlated with QIDS items assessing sleep function (P < .001), but correlations with items assessing appetite change were small (r < .10), demonstrating good discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support the reliability and validity of the PSQI and ISI for patients undergoing MBS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the reliability and validity of sleep assessments in patients seeking metabolic and bariatric surgery.
Background: More than 80% of patients seeking metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) report disturbance in sleep function. No studies have assessed the psychometric properties of sleep measures in MBS samples.
Objectives: This study assessed the reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in a large sample of patients seeking MBS.
Setting: Two academic medical centers.
Methods: Measures of sleep (PSQI and ISI) and psychological functioning, including the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), were administered presurgically. Internal consistency was assessed with mean inter-item correlations and item-total correlations. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) based on models identified in the literature and by measuring convergent and discriminant validity.
Results: Participants (N = 939) were primarily female (83.4%) with a mean age of 41.7 (SD = 11.5) years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 47.5 kg/m2 (SD = 8.5). CFAs indicated excellent fit for 2-factor solutions for the PSQI and ISI. Internal consistency for the PSQI and ISI were acceptable. Convergent validity was demonstrated by large correlations between the PSQI and ISI (r = .80, p < .001), and moderate correlation between the PSQI, ISI, and QIDS (rs > .50, ps < .001). The PSQI and ISI were moderately correlated with QIDS items assessing sleep function (P < .001), but correlations with items assessing appetite change were small (r < .10), demonstrating good discriminant validity.
Conclusions: Results support the reliability and validity of the PSQI and ISI for patients undergoing MBS.