Tran Tho Nhi, Pham Manh Hung, Pham Do Khanh Phuong, Pham Hong Ha, Le Minh Dat, Vu Duc Vinh
{"title":"临床实习期间针对医学生的工作场所暴力及其相关因素:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Tran Tho Nhi, Pham Manh Hung, Pham Do Khanh Phuong, Pham Hong Ha, Le Minh Dat, Vu Duc Vinh","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2024.2427912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study aims to describe the status of workplace violence against medical students during clinical practice, which consists of its prevalence, types, perpetrators, students' responses and influences on them, reasons for workplace violence and to determine some relevant factors of this issue through both quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interview. A descriptive cross-sectional study with mixed methods was conducted on 320 students from the second-year to the sixth-year classes at Hanoi Medical University from August 2022 to February 2023. The questionnaire was based on the WHO questionnaire survey 'Workplace violence in the health sector - country case studies research instruments - Geneva 2003'. 10 students from quantitative research who completed the questionnaire, experienced at least one type of workplace violence and consented to continue taking part in the research were chosen for in-depth interviews. The prevalence of students witnessing and/or experiencing workplace violence was 35.6% and 19.4% of the sample population had experienced at least one kind of workplace violence. Medical staff were the most common perpetrators. 86.8% of students who were exposed to workplace violence did not report the incidents for a variety of reasons. The major reasons leading to workplace violence related to patients, patients' relatives and students, among which the first-ranked ones were the patients' education level and their unsatisfied expectations. Some relevant factors to workplace violence against medical students were determined by quantitative analysis such as students' grade (OR = 3.09) and region (OR = 3.31) and were explored additionally by qualitative interview such as the student management of the instructors, students' personality, attitude and appearance as well as hospital environment. Based on the research findings, establishing prevention methods, which require action from both individuals (students, medical staff) and organizations (universities, hospitals) is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1876-1893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace violence against medical students during clinical practice and its relevant factors: a mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Tran Tho Nhi, Pham Manh Hung, Pham Do Khanh Phuong, Pham Hong Ha, Le Minh Dat, Vu Duc Vinh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2024.2427912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our study aims to describe the status of workplace violence against medical students during clinical practice, which consists of its prevalence, types, perpetrators, students' responses and influences on them, reasons for workplace violence and to determine some relevant factors of this issue through both quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interview. A descriptive cross-sectional study with mixed methods was conducted on 320 students from the second-year to the sixth-year classes at Hanoi Medical University from August 2022 to February 2023. The questionnaire was based on the WHO questionnaire survey 'Workplace violence in the health sector - country case studies research instruments - Geneva 2003'. 10 students from quantitative research who completed the questionnaire, experienced at least one type of workplace violence and consented to continue taking part in the research were chosen for in-depth interviews. The prevalence of students witnessing and/or experiencing workplace violence was 35.6% and 19.4% of the sample population had experienced at least one kind of workplace violence. Medical staff were the most common perpetrators. 86.8% of students who were exposed to workplace violence did not report the incidents for a variety of reasons. The major reasons leading to workplace violence related to patients, patients' relatives and students, among which the first-ranked ones were the patients' education level and their unsatisfied expectations. Some relevant factors to workplace violence against medical students were determined by quantitative analysis such as students' grade (OR = 3.09) and region (OR = 3.31) and were explored additionally by qualitative interview such as the student management of the instructors, students' personality, attitude and appearance as well as hospital environment. Based on the research findings, establishing prevention methods, which require action from both individuals (students, medical staff) and organizations (universities, hospitals) is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1876-1893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2427912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2427912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Workplace violence against medical students during clinical practice and its relevant factors: a mixed methods study.
Our study aims to describe the status of workplace violence against medical students during clinical practice, which consists of its prevalence, types, perpetrators, students' responses and influences on them, reasons for workplace violence and to determine some relevant factors of this issue through both quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interview. A descriptive cross-sectional study with mixed methods was conducted on 320 students from the second-year to the sixth-year classes at Hanoi Medical University from August 2022 to February 2023. The questionnaire was based on the WHO questionnaire survey 'Workplace violence in the health sector - country case studies research instruments - Geneva 2003'. 10 students from quantitative research who completed the questionnaire, experienced at least one type of workplace violence and consented to continue taking part in the research were chosen for in-depth interviews. The prevalence of students witnessing and/or experiencing workplace violence was 35.6% and 19.4% of the sample population had experienced at least one kind of workplace violence. Medical staff were the most common perpetrators. 86.8% of students who were exposed to workplace violence did not report the incidents for a variety of reasons. The major reasons leading to workplace violence related to patients, patients' relatives and students, among which the first-ranked ones were the patients' education level and their unsatisfied expectations. Some relevant factors to workplace violence against medical students were determined by quantitative analysis such as students' grade (OR = 3.09) and region (OR = 3.31) and were explored additionally by qualitative interview such as the student management of the instructors, students' personality, attitude and appearance as well as hospital environment. Based on the research findings, establishing prevention methods, which require action from both individuals (students, medical staff) and organizations (universities, hospitals) is recommended.
期刊介绍:
Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management.
For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.