利用生命周期评估对电动汽车电池进行报废管理。

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Anatawat Chayutthanabun, Thanwadee Chinda, Seksan Papong
{"title":"利用生命周期评估对电动汽车电池进行报废管理。","authors":"Anatawat Chayutthanabun, Thanwadee Chinda, Seksan Papong","doi":"10.1080/10962247.2024.2430325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To achieve sustainable development in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, this study assesses the environmental impacts of retired electric vehicle batteries (EVBs) throughout the life cycle. The life cycle assessment (LCA) with the ReCiPe method is implemented with environmental impacts: CO<sub>2eq</sub> emissions, human toxicity, terrestrial acidification, particulate matter (PM) formation, metal depletion, and fossil depletion. Four EOL management scenarios, namely the landfilling, remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling processes, are examined with the background data obtained from the Ecoinvent database v3.6 and data collected from secondary sources. The study results reveal that the landfilling scenario is highly harmful to humans and due to its highest environmental impacts, specifically CO2 emission (2,236 kg CO<sub>2eq</sub>) from the material extraction process. In contrast, the recycling scenario is the most environmentally friendly scenario, as it reduces the human toxicity (45,934 kg 1,4-DB<sub>eq</sub>), terrestrial acidification (425 kg SO<sub>2eq</sub>), and metal depletion (20,129 kg Fe<sub>eq</sub>), achieving the lowest final impact score of -277. The study further examines the recycling scenario with different energy mixes, i.e. natural gas, coal, and renewable energy. The results suggest that the complete use of renewable energy could improve the final impact value to -281.1. The results also recommend the remanufacturing scenario as it reduces CO<sub>2eq</sub> emission by 1,193 kg CO<sub>2eq</sub>. The government may utilize the study results to enhance the circular economy of retired EVBs through various strategies to compete in the global market. A comprehensive evaluation of EOL management practices of retired EVBs offers valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to minimize the ecological footprint of the EV industry and support Thailand's sustainability goals. A future study may be performed to compare the EOL management scenarios with actual practices and suggest suitable improvements. The policy-based simulations could be implemented to examine long-term impacts of EOL management practices in Thailand.<i>Implications:</i> This study examines the end-of-life management of electric vehicle batteries (EVBs) through remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling scenarios. The results show that the recycling scenario is the most effective EOL strategy for retired EVBs as it generates the lowest human toxicity, terrestrial acidification, and metal depletion. Alternatively, the remanufacturing scenario is the most suitable scenario when CO2eq emission is a major concern. The results also recommend at least half of renewable energy to be used in electricity production to improve the final impact of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","volume":" ","pages":"131-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-of-life management of electric vehicle batteries utilizing the life cycle assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Anatawat Chayutthanabun, Thanwadee Chinda, Seksan Papong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10962247.2024.2430325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To achieve sustainable development in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, this study assesses the environmental impacts of retired electric vehicle batteries (EVBs) throughout the life cycle. The life cycle assessment (LCA) with the ReCiPe method is implemented with environmental impacts: CO<sub>2eq</sub> emissions, human toxicity, terrestrial acidification, particulate matter (PM) formation, metal depletion, and fossil depletion. Four EOL management scenarios, namely the landfilling, remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling processes, are examined with the background data obtained from the Ecoinvent database v3.6 and data collected from secondary sources. The study results reveal that the landfilling scenario is highly harmful to humans and due to its highest environmental impacts, specifically CO2 emission (2,236 kg CO<sub>2eq</sub>) from the material extraction process. In contrast, the recycling scenario is the most environmentally friendly scenario, as it reduces the human toxicity (45,934 kg 1,4-DB<sub>eq</sub>), terrestrial acidification (425 kg SO<sub>2eq</sub>), and metal depletion (20,129 kg Fe<sub>eq</sub>), achieving the lowest final impact score of -277. The study further examines the recycling scenario with different energy mixes, i.e. natural gas, coal, and renewable energy. The results suggest that the complete use of renewable energy could improve the final impact value to -281.1. The results also recommend the remanufacturing scenario as it reduces CO<sub>2eq</sub> emission by 1,193 kg CO<sub>2eq</sub>. The government may utilize the study results to enhance the circular economy of retired EVBs through various strategies to compete in the global market. A comprehensive evaluation of EOL management practices of retired EVBs offers valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to minimize the ecological footprint of the EV industry and support Thailand's sustainability goals. A future study may be performed to compare the EOL management scenarios with actual practices and suggest suitable improvements. The policy-based simulations could be implemented to examine long-term impacts of EOL management practices in Thailand.<i>Implications:</i> This study examines the end-of-life management of electric vehicle batteries (EVBs) through remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling scenarios. The results show that the recycling scenario is the most effective EOL strategy for retired EVBs as it generates the lowest human toxicity, terrestrial acidification, and metal depletion. Alternatively, the remanufacturing scenario is the most suitable scenario when CO2eq emission is a major concern. The results also recommend at least half of renewable energy to be used in electricity production to improve the final impact of this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"131-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2430325\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2430325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现电动汽车(EV)行业的可持续发展,本研究评估了报废电动汽车电池(EVB)在整个生命周期中对环境的影响。采用 ReCiPe 方法进行的生命周期评估(LCA)涉及环境影响:二氧化碳排放、人体毒性、陆地酸化、颗粒物(PM)形成、金属损耗和化石损耗。利用从 Ecoinvent 数据库 v3.6 获取的背景数据和从二手来源收集的数据,研究了四种 EOL 管理方案,即填埋、再制造、再利用和回收流程。研究结果表明,填埋方案对人类危害极大,对环境的影响也最大,特别是材料提取过程中的二氧化碳排放量(2 236 千克二氧化碳当量)。相比之下,回收利用方案是最环保的方案,因为它减少了对人体的毒性(45,934 千克 1,4-DBeq)、陆地酸化(425 千克 SO2eq)和金属损耗(20,129 千克 Feeq),最终影响得分最低,为-277 分。研究进一步考察了不同能源组合(即天然气、煤炭和可再生能源)的循环利用情景。结果表明,完全使用可再生能源可将最终影响值提高到 -281.1。研究结果还建议采用再制造方案,因为该方案可减少 1 193 千克二氧化碳当量的排放。政府可利用研究结果,通过各种战略加强退役电动自行车的循环经济,以参与全球市场竞争。对退役电动车EOL管理实践的全面评估为政策制定者和利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解,以最大限度地减少电动车行业的生态足迹,支持泰国的可持续发展目标。未来的研究可能会将 EOL 管理方案与实际做法进行比较,并提出适当的改进建议。可以实施基于政策的模拟,以研究 EOL 管理实践对泰国的长期影响。影响声明 全球变暖问题已变得十分严峻,世界各国都在启动相关政策和战略,以最大限度地减少废物和对环境的影响。电动汽车(EV)的使用有望减少对环境的影响,但也带来了电动汽车电池(EVB)废弃物的问题。本研究探讨了报废电动汽车电池管理(EOL)对环境的影响,特别是再制造、再利用和回收过程。研究结果指出了几个关键影响,即 EOL 管理过程中的二氧化碳当量排放、人体毒性、陆地酸化、颗粒物形成、金属损耗和化石损耗。很明显,目前的做法(即填埋)对人类和环境的危害很大,主要来自材料提取过程。相比之下,退役 EVB 最有效的 EOL 策略是回收利用,因为回收利用产生的人体毒性、陆地酸化和金属损耗最低。当二氧化碳排放量是一个主要问题时,再制造方案是最合适的方案。研究还考察了再循环方案的不同能源组合(即天然气、煤炭和可再生能源)。结果表明,至少一半的电力生产能源应为可再生能源,以进一步改善该方案的最终影响。对退役 EVB 的 EOL 管理实践的全面评估为政府和利益相关方规划可持续的 EOL 管理政策提供了宝贵的见解,从而减少生态足迹,实现长期可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
End-of-life management of electric vehicle batteries utilizing the life cycle assessment.

To achieve sustainable development in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, this study assesses the environmental impacts of retired electric vehicle batteries (EVBs) throughout the life cycle. The life cycle assessment (LCA) with the ReCiPe method is implemented with environmental impacts: CO2eq emissions, human toxicity, terrestrial acidification, particulate matter (PM) formation, metal depletion, and fossil depletion. Four EOL management scenarios, namely the landfilling, remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling processes, are examined with the background data obtained from the Ecoinvent database v3.6 and data collected from secondary sources. The study results reveal that the landfilling scenario is highly harmful to humans and due to its highest environmental impacts, specifically CO2 emission (2,236 kg CO2eq) from the material extraction process. In contrast, the recycling scenario is the most environmentally friendly scenario, as it reduces the human toxicity (45,934 kg 1,4-DBeq), terrestrial acidification (425 kg SO2eq), and metal depletion (20,129 kg Feeq), achieving the lowest final impact score of -277. The study further examines the recycling scenario with different energy mixes, i.e. natural gas, coal, and renewable energy. The results suggest that the complete use of renewable energy could improve the final impact value to -281.1. The results also recommend the remanufacturing scenario as it reduces CO2eq emission by 1,193 kg CO2eq. The government may utilize the study results to enhance the circular economy of retired EVBs through various strategies to compete in the global market. A comprehensive evaluation of EOL management practices of retired EVBs offers valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to minimize the ecological footprint of the EV industry and support Thailand's sustainability goals. A future study may be performed to compare the EOL management scenarios with actual practices and suggest suitable improvements. The policy-based simulations could be implemented to examine long-term impacts of EOL management practices in Thailand.Implications: This study examines the end-of-life management of electric vehicle batteries (EVBs) through remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling scenarios. The results show that the recycling scenario is the most effective EOL strategy for retired EVBs as it generates the lowest human toxicity, terrestrial acidification, and metal depletion. Alternatively, the remanufacturing scenario is the most suitable scenario when CO2eq emission is a major concern. The results also recommend at least half of renewable energy to be used in electricity production to improve the final impact of this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (J&AWMA) is one of the oldest continuously published, peer-reviewed, technical environmental journals in the world. First published in 1951 under the name Air Repair, J&AWMA is intended to serve those occupationally involved in air pollution control and waste management through the publication of timely and reliable information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信