中风幸存者闲暇时间体育活动与全因死亡率之间的关系:全国健康与营养调查的结果。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Min Ju, Yangzheng Li, Junjie Pei, Jiayi Xing, Lingyi Wu, He Liu, Zhiping Liao, YiYu Zhuang
{"title":"中风幸存者闲暇时间体育活动与全因死亡率之间的关系:全国健康与营养调查的结果。","authors":"Min Ju, Yangzheng Li, Junjie Pei, Jiayi Xing, Lingyi Wu, He Liu, Zhiping Liao, YiYu Zhuang","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2024-0287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability globally. But little is known about the optimal level of physical activity for stroke survivors. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the dose-response relationship between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and all-cause mortality in stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-thousand six hundred and sixty-four stroke survivors form from the 1999 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were classified into 6 groups: 0, 1 to 149, 150 to 299, 300 to 599, 600 to 899, and ≥900 minutes per week (based on the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire). Cox proportional hazards regression models with different adjustments of covariates were used to investigate the association between LTPA and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for stroke survivors with LTPA levels ranging from 600 to 899 minutes per week (P = .055), there was a significant difference in survival rates among stroke survivors with different levels of LTPA compared with those without LTPA. Stroke survivors engaging in LTPA levels exceeding 900 minutes per week exhibited the greatest benefit compared with stroke survivors who did not engage in LTPA (hazard ratio = 0.225; 95% confidence interval, 0.122-0.414).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research findings add to the expanding evidence base that highlights the favorable connection between LTPA and decreased risk of all-cause mortality among individuals who have survived a stroke. Our study emphasizes the significance of incorporating physical activity interventions into the poststroke care regimen and underscores the potential advantages of personalized activity guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and All-Cause Mortality Among Stroke Survivors: Findings From National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Min Ju, Yangzheng Li, Junjie Pei, Jiayi Xing, Lingyi Wu, He Liu, Zhiping Liao, YiYu Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jpah.2024-0287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability globally. But little is known about the optimal level of physical activity for stroke survivors. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the dose-response relationship between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and all-cause mortality in stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-thousand six hundred and sixty-four stroke survivors form from the 1999 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were classified into 6 groups: 0, 1 to 149, 150 to 299, 300 to 599, 600 to 899, and ≥900 minutes per week (based on the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire). Cox proportional hazards regression models with different adjustments of covariates were used to investigate the association between LTPA and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for stroke survivors with LTPA levels ranging from 600 to 899 minutes per week (P = .055), there was a significant difference in survival rates among stroke survivors with different levels of LTPA compared with those without LTPA. Stroke survivors engaging in LTPA levels exceeding 900 minutes per week exhibited the greatest benefit compared with stroke survivors who did not engage in LTPA (hazard ratio = 0.225; 95% confidence interval, 0.122-0.414).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research findings add to the expanding evidence base that highlights the favorable connection between LTPA and decreased risk of all-cause mortality among individuals who have survived a stroke. Our study emphasizes the significance of incorporating physical activity interventions into the poststroke care regimen and underscores the potential advantages of personalized activity guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0287\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中风是全球第二大死因和第三大致残原因。但人们对中风幸存者的最佳体育锻炼水平知之甚少。因此,我们旨在分析中风幸存者闲暇时间体力活动(LTPA)与全因死亡率之间的剂量-反应关系:将 1999 年至 2018 年全国健康与营养调查中的 1664 名中风幸存者分为 6 组:每周 0 分钟、1 至 149 分钟、150 至 299 分钟、300 至 599 分钟、600 至 899 分钟和≥900 分钟(基于全球体力活动调查问卷)。采用不同协变量调整的 Cox 比例危险回归模型来研究 LTPA 与全因死亡率之间的关系:结果发现:除了每周锻炼时间在 600 到 899 分钟之间(P = 0.055)的中风幸存者外,不同锻炼时间的中风幸存者的存活率与没有锻炼时间的中风幸存者相比存在显著差异。与未进行LTPA的中风幸存者相比,每周LTPA时间超过900分钟的中风幸存者获益最大(危险比=0.225;95%置信区间为0.122-0.414):我们的研究结果为不断扩大的证据库增添了新的内容,这些证据强调了在中风幸存者中,LTPA 与降低全因死亡风险之间的有利联系。我们的研究强调了将体育锻炼干预纳入脑卒中后护理方案的重要性,并突出了个性化活动指导的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and All-Cause Mortality Among Stroke Survivors: Findings From National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Background: Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability globally. But little is known about the optimal level of physical activity for stroke survivors. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the dose-response relationship between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and all-cause mortality in stroke survivors.

Methods: One-thousand six hundred and sixty-four stroke survivors form from the 1999 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were classified into 6 groups: 0, 1 to 149, 150 to 299, 300 to 599, 600 to 899, and ≥900 minutes per week (based on the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire). Cox proportional hazards regression models with different adjustments of covariates were used to investigate the association between LTPA and all-cause mortality.

Results: Except for stroke survivors with LTPA levels ranging from 600 to 899 minutes per week (P = .055), there was a significant difference in survival rates among stroke survivors with different levels of LTPA compared with those without LTPA. Stroke survivors engaging in LTPA levels exceeding 900 minutes per week exhibited the greatest benefit compared with stroke survivors who did not engage in LTPA (hazard ratio = 0.225; 95% confidence interval, 0.122-0.414).

Conclusions: Our research findings add to the expanding evidence base that highlights the favorable connection between LTPA and decreased risk of all-cause mortality among individuals who have survived a stroke. Our study emphasizes the significance of incorporating physical activity interventions into the poststroke care regimen and underscores the potential advantages of personalized activity guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信