林奇综合征患者对阿司匹林化学预防的接受程度。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1200/PO-24-00562
Sachi Singhal, Emma D Riggs, Karen J Ruth, Juan Pablo Chavez-Salas, Yana Chertock, Mary B Daly, Michael J Hall
{"title":"林奇综合征患者对阿司匹林化学预防的接受程度。","authors":"Sachi Singhal, Emma D Riggs, Karen J Ruth, Juan Pablo Chavez-Salas, Yana Chertock, Mary B Daly, Michael J Hall","doi":"10.1200/PO-24-00562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at a high lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers. Aspirin (ASA), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has proven chemopreventive benefits in LS, with the CAPP2 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrating a 60% relative risk reduction for CRC among participants who adhered to ASA for 2 years or more. This study sought to characterize uptake of ASA/NSAIDs among individuals with LS and to understand factors associated with use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with LS were invited (June 2020-August 2022) to complete a one-time electronic survey about LS screening behaviors, uptake of ASA/NSAIDs, and current/emerging cancer prevention options. Participants were recruited from the Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC) Risk Assessment Program Registry and through a research invitation posted to two patient-facing LS advocacy websites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and ninety-six participants completed the survey including 116 (39.2%) from FCCC and 180 (60.8%) recruited via the Internet, including 14.9% non-US based individuals. Uptake of regular ASA or NSAIDs was modest at 34.8% and was even lower (25.7%) when focusing on individuals taking ASA or NSAIDs solely for chemoprevention of LS. More than half (55%) were taking <100 mg ASA daily. In multivariable modeling, lower perceived threat of LS (odds ratio [OR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98]), lower <i>concern for side effects</i> (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.99]), and higher <i>likelihood of recommending ASA/NSAIDs to family or a friend</i> were all associated with ASA/NSAIDs use (OR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.37 to 2.10]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uptake of ASA/NSAIDs chemoprevention is modest among individuals with LS. Patient perceptions of the pros and cons of ASA, more so than demographic and disease-related factors, were associated with chemoprevention uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400562"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake of Aspirin Chemoprevention in Patients With Lynch Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Sachi Singhal, Emma D Riggs, Karen J Ruth, Juan Pablo Chavez-Salas, Yana Chertock, Mary B Daly, Michael J Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-24-00562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at a high lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers. Aspirin (ASA), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has proven chemopreventive benefits in LS, with the CAPP2 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrating a 60% relative risk reduction for CRC among participants who adhered to ASA for 2 years or more. This study sought to characterize uptake of ASA/NSAIDs among individuals with LS and to understand factors associated with use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with LS were invited (June 2020-August 2022) to complete a one-time electronic survey about LS screening behaviors, uptake of ASA/NSAIDs, and current/emerging cancer prevention options. Participants were recruited from the Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC) Risk Assessment Program Registry and through a research invitation posted to two patient-facing LS advocacy websites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and ninety-six participants completed the survey including 116 (39.2%) from FCCC and 180 (60.8%) recruited via the Internet, including 14.9% non-US based individuals. Uptake of regular ASA or NSAIDs was modest at 34.8% and was even lower (25.7%) when focusing on individuals taking ASA or NSAIDs solely for chemoprevention of LS. More than half (55%) were taking <100 mg ASA daily. In multivariable modeling, lower perceived threat of LS (odds ratio [OR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98]), lower <i>concern for side effects</i> (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.99]), and higher <i>likelihood of recommending ASA/NSAIDs to family or a friend</i> were all associated with ASA/NSAIDs use (OR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.37 to 2.10]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uptake of ASA/NSAIDs chemoprevention is modest among individuals with LS. Patient perceptions of the pros and cons of ASA, more so than demographic and disease-related factors, were associated with chemoprevention uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00562\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:林奇综合征(LS)患者终生罹患结直肠癌(CRC)和其他癌症的风险很高。阿司匹林(ASA)是一种非甾体抗炎药(NSAID),已被证实对林奇综合征患者有化学预防作用,CAPP2 随机双盲安慰剂对照试验表明,坚持服用阿司匹林 2 年或更长时间的参与者患 CRC 的相对风险降低了 60%。本研究旨在了解LS患者服用ASA/NSAIDs的情况,并了解与使用ASA/NSAIDs相关的因素:邀请 LS 患者(2020 年 6 月至 2022 年 8 月)完成一次性电子调查,了解 LS 筛查行为、ASA/NSAIDs 摄入情况以及当前/新出现的癌症预防方案。参与者是从福克斯蔡斯癌症中心(FCCC)风险评估项目登记处以及两个面向患者的LS宣传网站上发布的研究邀请中招募的:296 名参与者完成了调查,其中 116 人(39.2%)来自 FCCC,180 人(60.8%)通过互联网招募,包括 14.9% 的非美国居民。定期服用 ASA 或非甾体抗炎药的人数不多,仅占 34.8%,如果仅为化学预防 LS 而服用 ASA 或非甾体抗炎药的人数更少(25.7%)。半数以上(55%)服用者担心副作用(OR,0.86 [95% CI,0.76 至 0.99]),向家人或朋友推荐ASA/NSAIDs的可能性较高,这些都与服用ASA/NSAIDs有关(OR,1.70 [95% CI,1.37 至 2.10]):LS患者对ASA/NSAIDs化学预防的接受程度不高。患者对ASA利弊的看法比人口统计学和疾病相关因素更能影响化学预防的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uptake of Aspirin Chemoprevention in Patients With Lynch Syndrome.

Purpose: Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at a high lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers. Aspirin (ASA), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has proven chemopreventive benefits in LS, with the CAPP2 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrating a 60% relative risk reduction for CRC among participants who adhered to ASA for 2 years or more. This study sought to characterize uptake of ASA/NSAIDs among individuals with LS and to understand factors associated with use.

Methods: Individuals with LS were invited (June 2020-August 2022) to complete a one-time electronic survey about LS screening behaviors, uptake of ASA/NSAIDs, and current/emerging cancer prevention options. Participants were recruited from the Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC) Risk Assessment Program Registry and through a research invitation posted to two patient-facing LS advocacy websites.

Results: Two hundred and ninety-six participants completed the survey including 116 (39.2%) from FCCC and 180 (60.8%) recruited via the Internet, including 14.9% non-US based individuals. Uptake of regular ASA or NSAIDs was modest at 34.8% and was even lower (25.7%) when focusing on individuals taking ASA or NSAIDs solely for chemoprevention of LS. More than half (55%) were taking <100 mg ASA daily. In multivariable modeling, lower perceived threat of LS (odds ratio [OR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98]), lower concern for side effects (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.99]), and higher likelihood of recommending ASA/NSAIDs to family or a friend were all associated with ASA/NSAIDs use (OR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.37 to 2.10]).

Conclusion: Uptake of ASA/NSAIDs chemoprevention is modest among individuals with LS. Patient perceptions of the pros and cons of ASA, more so than demographic and disease-related factors, were associated with chemoprevention uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信