{"title":"人工智能对放射医师在骨龄X光片评估中阅读时间的影响:一项初步回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Sejin Jeong, Kyunghwa Han, Yaeseul Kang, Eun-Kyung Kim, Kyungchul Song, Shreyas Vasanawala, Hyun Joo Shin","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01323-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the real-world impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on radiologists' reading time during bone age (BA) radiograph assessments. Patients (<19 year-old) who underwent left-hand BA radiographs between December 2021 and October 2023 were retrospectively included. A commercial AI software was installed from October 2022. Radiologists' reading times, automatically recorded in the PACS log, were compared between the AI-unaided and AI-aided periods using linear regression tests and factors affecting reading time were identified. A total of 3643 radiographs (M:F=1295:2348, mean age 9.12 ± 2.31 years) were included and read by three radiologists, with 2937 radiographs (80.6%) in the AI-aided period. Overall reading times were significantly shorter in the AI-aided period compared to the AI-unaided period (mean 17.2 ± 12.9 seconds vs. mean 22.3 ± 14.7 seconds, p < 0.001). Staff reading times significantly decreased in the AI-aided period (mean 15.9 ± 11.4 seconds vs. mean 19.9 ± 13.4 seconds, p < 0.001), while resident reading times increased (mean 38.3 ± 16.4 seconds vs. 33.6 ± 15.3 seconds, p = 0.013). The use of AI and years of experience in radiology were significant factors affecting reading time (all, p≤0.001). The degree of decrease in reading time as experience increased was larger when utilizing AI (-1.151 for AI-unaided, -1.866 for AI-aided, difference =-0.715, p<0.001). In terms of AI exposure time, the staff's reading time decreased by 0.62 seconds per month (standard error 0.07, p<0.001) during the AI-aided period. The reading time of radiologists for BA assessment was influenced by AI. The time-saving effect of utilizing AI became more pronounced as the radiologists' experience and AI exposure time increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1915-1923"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Radiologists' Reading Time in Bone Age Radiograph Assessment: A Preliminary Retrospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sejin Jeong, Kyunghwa Han, Yaeseul Kang, Eun-Kyung Kim, Kyungchul Song, Shreyas Vasanawala, Hyun Joo Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10278-024-01323-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To evaluate the real-world impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on radiologists' reading time during bone age (BA) radiograph assessments. Patients (<19 year-old) who underwent left-hand BA radiographs between December 2021 and October 2023 were retrospectively included. A commercial AI software was installed from October 2022. Radiologists' reading times, automatically recorded in the PACS log, were compared between the AI-unaided and AI-aided periods using linear regression tests and factors affecting reading time were identified. A total of 3643 radiographs (M:F=1295:2348, mean age 9.12 ± 2.31 years) were included and read by three radiologists, with 2937 radiographs (80.6%) in the AI-aided period. Overall reading times were significantly shorter in the AI-aided period compared to the AI-unaided period (mean 17.2 ± 12.9 seconds vs. mean 22.3 ± 14.7 seconds, p < 0.001). Staff reading times significantly decreased in the AI-aided period (mean 15.9 ± 11.4 seconds vs. mean 19.9 ± 13.4 seconds, p < 0.001), while resident reading times increased (mean 38.3 ± 16.4 seconds vs. 33.6 ± 15.3 seconds, p = 0.013). The use of AI and years of experience in radiology were significant factors affecting reading time (all, p≤0.001). The degree of decrease in reading time as experience increased was larger when utilizing AI (-1.151 for AI-unaided, -1.866 for AI-aided, difference =-0.715, p<0.001). In terms of AI exposure time, the staff's reading time decreased by 0.62 seconds per month (standard error 0.07, p<0.001) during the AI-aided period. The reading time of radiologists for BA assessment was influenced by AI. The time-saving effect of utilizing AI became more pronounced as the radiologists' experience and AI exposure time increased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1915-1923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344022/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01323-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01323-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Radiologists' Reading Time in Bone Age Radiograph Assessment: A Preliminary Retrospective Observational Study.
To evaluate the real-world impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on radiologists' reading time during bone age (BA) radiograph assessments. Patients (<19 year-old) who underwent left-hand BA radiographs between December 2021 and October 2023 were retrospectively included. A commercial AI software was installed from October 2022. Radiologists' reading times, automatically recorded in the PACS log, were compared between the AI-unaided and AI-aided periods using linear regression tests and factors affecting reading time were identified. A total of 3643 radiographs (M:F=1295:2348, mean age 9.12 ± 2.31 years) were included and read by three radiologists, with 2937 radiographs (80.6%) in the AI-aided period. Overall reading times were significantly shorter in the AI-aided period compared to the AI-unaided period (mean 17.2 ± 12.9 seconds vs. mean 22.3 ± 14.7 seconds, p < 0.001). Staff reading times significantly decreased in the AI-aided period (mean 15.9 ± 11.4 seconds vs. mean 19.9 ± 13.4 seconds, p < 0.001), while resident reading times increased (mean 38.3 ± 16.4 seconds vs. 33.6 ± 15.3 seconds, p = 0.013). The use of AI and years of experience in radiology were significant factors affecting reading time (all, p≤0.001). The degree of decrease in reading time as experience increased was larger when utilizing AI (-1.151 for AI-unaided, -1.866 for AI-aided, difference =-0.715, p<0.001). In terms of AI exposure time, the staff's reading time decreased by 0.62 seconds per month (standard error 0.07, p<0.001) during the AI-aided period. The reading time of radiologists for BA assessment was influenced by AI. The time-saving effect of utilizing AI became more pronounced as the radiologists' experience and AI exposure time increased.