地诺单抗治疗长期护理中老年人的骨质疏松症:随机试验。

Susan L Greenspan, Subashan Perera, Nami Safai Haeri, David A Nace, Neil M Resnick
{"title":"地诺单抗治疗长期护理中老年人的骨质疏松症:随机试验。","authors":"Susan L Greenspan, Subashan Perera, Nami Safai Haeri, David A Nace, Neil M Resnick","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In long-term care (LTC), the incidence of hip or vertebral fractures are eight times that in the community. Despite the wide availability of osteoporosis therapy, LTC residents are omitted from pivotal trials and not treated. Denosumab is a relatively new, monoclonal antibody therapy for osteoporosis treatment. Via a randomized trial, we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of denosumab in LTC residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in 201 osteoporotic men and women aged ≥ 65 years, living in LTC communities. Participants with multimorbidity, dysmobility, and cognitive impairment were not excluded. The intervention was denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous every 6 months or placebo. Our primary outcome measures were hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) improvement at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included BMD at other skeletal sites, function, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 123 women and 78 men with a mean ± standard error age of 81.5 ± 0.6. Overall, 83% and 71% completed 12 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with placebo, the women receiving denosumab had a greater 24-month percent increase in spine (7.41 ± 0.93 vs. 2.15 + 0.56; p = 0.014), and total hip BMD (4.62 ± 0.62 vs. -0.19 ± 0.79; p = 0.007); and men in spine (7.91 ± 0.96 vs. 1.12 ± 1.13; p = 0.002) and total hip (3.74 ± 0.55 vs. 0.48 ± 0.74; p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in safety metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Denosumab was a safe and effective therapy for improving BMD in osteoporotic older men and women with multiple comorbidities in LTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Susan L Greenspan, Subashan Perera, Nami Safai Haeri, David A Nace, Neil M Resnick\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In long-term care (LTC), the incidence of hip or vertebral fractures are eight times that in the community. Despite the wide availability of osteoporosis therapy, LTC residents are omitted from pivotal trials and not treated. Denosumab is a relatively new, monoclonal antibody therapy for osteoporosis treatment. Via a randomized trial, we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of denosumab in LTC residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in 201 osteoporotic men and women aged ≥ 65 years, living in LTC communities. Participants with multimorbidity, dysmobility, and cognitive impairment were not excluded. The intervention was denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous every 6 months or placebo. Our primary outcome measures were hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) improvement at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included BMD at other skeletal sites, function, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 123 women and 78 men with a mean ± standard error age of 81.5 ± 0.6. Overall, 83% and 71% completed 12 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with placebo, the women receiving denosumab had a greater 24-month percent increase in spine (7.41 ± 0.93 vs. 2.15 + 0.56; p = 0.014), and total hip BMD (4.62 ± 0.62 vs. -0.19 ± 0.79; p = 0.007); and men in spine (7.91 ± 0.96 vs. 1.12 ± 1.13; p = 0.002) and total hip (3.74 ± 0.55 vs. 0.48 ± 0.74; p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in safety metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Denosumab was a safe and effective therapy for improving BMD in osteoporotic older men and women with multiple comorbidities in LTC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在长期护理(LTC)中,髋部或脊椎骨折的发生率是社区中的八倍。尽管骨质疏松症的治疗方法非常广泛,但长期护理中心的居民却被排除在关键试验之外,得不到治疗。地诺单抗是一种相对较新的治疗骨质疏松症的单克隆抗体疗法。通过一项随机试验,我们试图确定地诺单抗对长者照护中心居民的安全性和有效性:我们对居住在 LTC 社区的 201 名年龄≥ 65 岁的骨质疏松症男性和女性进行了为期 2 年的双盲安慰剂对照随机临床试验。不排除有多病症、行动不便和认知障碍的参与者。干预措施为每 6 个月皮下注射 60 毫克地诺单抗或安慰剂。我们的主要结果指标是 24 个月时髋部和脊柱骨矿物质密度 (BMD) 的改善情况。次要结果包括其他骨骼部位的 BMD、功能和安全性:我们纳入了 123 名女性和 78 名男性,平均年龄为 81.5±0.6 岁。总体而言,分别有 83% 和 71% 的人完成了 12 个月和 24 个月的治疗。与安慰剂相比,接受地诺单抗治疗的女性在 24 个月内脊柱(7.41 ± 0.93 vs. 2.15 + 0.56; p = 0.014)和总髋关节 BMD(4.62 ± 0.62 vs. -0.19 ± 0.79;p = 0.007);男性脊柱(7.91 ± 0.96 vs. 1.12 ± 1.13;p = 0.002)和全髋(3.74 ± 0.55 vs. 0.48 ± 0.74;p = 0.018)。安全性指标无明显差异:结论:地诺单抗是一种安全有效的疗法,可改善患有骨质疏松症的老年男性和患有多种合并症的老年女性的BMD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial.

Background: In long-term care (LTC), the incidence of hip or vertebral fractures are eight times that in the community. Despite the wide availability of osteoporosis therapy, LTC residents are omitted from pivotal trials and not treated. Denosumab is a relatively new, monoclonal antibody therapy for osteoporosis treatment. Via a randomized trial, we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of denosumab in LTC residents.

Methods: We conducted a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in 201 osteoporotic men and women aged ≥ 65 years, living in LTC communities. Participants with multimorbidity, dysmobility, and cognitive impairment were not excluded. The intervention was denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous every 6 months or placebo. Our primary outcome measures were hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) improvement at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included BMD at other skeletal sites, function, and safety.

Results: We included 123 women and 78 men with a mean ± standard error age of 81.5 ± 0.6. Overall, 83% and 71% completed 12 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with placebo, the women receiving denosumab had a greater 24-month percent increase in spine (7.41 ± 0.93 vs. 2.15 + 0.56; p = 0.014), and total hip BMD (4.62 ± 0.62 vs. -0.19 ± 0.79; p = 0.007); and men in spine (7.91 ± 0.96 vs. 1.12 ± 1.13; p = 0.002) and total hip (3.74 ± 0.55 vs. 0.48 ± 0.74; p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in safety metrics.

Conclusions: Denosumab was a safe and effective therapy for improving BMD in osteoporotic older men and women with multiple comorbidities in LTC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信