技术说明:带有自动局部分割应用的自监督身体部位回归模型的神经网络架构。

Michael Fei, Alan B McMillan
{"title":"技术说明:带有自动局部分割应用的自监督身体部位回归模型的神经网络架构。","authors":"Michael Fei, Alan B McMillan","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01319-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advancement of medical image deep learning necessitates tools that can accurately identify body regions from whole-body scans to serve as an essential pre-processing step for downstream tasks. Typically, these deep learning models rely on labeled data and supervised learning, which is labor-intensive. However, the emergence of self-supervised learning is revolutionizing the field by eliminating the need for labels. The purpose of this study was to compare neural network architectures of self-supervised models that produced a body part regression (BPR) slice score to aid in the development of anatomically localized segmentation models. VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, ConvNext, and EfficientNet BPR models were implemented in the MONAI/Pytorch framework. Landmark organs were correlated to slice scores and mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated from the predicted slice and the actual slice of various organ landmarks. Four localized DynUNet segmentation models (thorax, upper abdomen, lower abdomen, and pelvis) were developed using the BPR slice scores. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was compared between the localized and baseline segmentation models. The best performing BPR model was the EfficientNet architecture with an overall 3.18 MAE, compared to the VGG baseline model with a MAE of 6.29. The localized segmentation model significantly outperformed the baseline in 16 out of 20 organs with a DSC of 0.88. Enhanced neural networks like EfficientNet have a large performance increase in localizing anatomical structures in a CT compared in BPR task. Utilizing BPR slice score is shown to be effective in anatomically localized segmentation tasks with improved performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical Note: Neural Network Architectures for Self-Supervised Body Part Regression Models with Automated Localized Segmentation Application.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Fei, Alan B McMillan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10278-024-01319-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The advancement of medical image deep learning necessitates tools that can accurately identify body regions from whole-body scans to serve as an essential pre-processing step for downstream tasks. Typically, these deep learning models rely on labeled data and supervised learning, which is labor-intensive. However, the emergence of self-supervised learning is revolutionizing the field by eliminating the need for labels. The purpose of this study was to compare neural network architectures of self-supervised models that produced a body part regression (BPR) slice score to aid in the development of anatomically localized segmentation models. VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, ConvNext, and EfficientNet BPR models were implemented in the MONAI/Pytorch framework. Landmark organs were correlated to slice scores and mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated from the predicted slice and the actual slice of various organ landmarks. Four localized DynUNet segmentation models (thorax, upper abdomen, lower abdomen, and pelvis) were developed using the BPR slice scores. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was compared between the localized and baseline segmentation models. The best performing BPR model was the EfficientNet architecture with an overall 3.18 MAE, compared to the VGG baseline model with a MAE of 6.29. The localized segmentation model significantly outperformed the baseline in 16 out of 20 organs with a DSC of 0.88. Enhanced neural networks like EfficientNet have a large performance increase in localizing anatomical structures in a CT compared in BPR task. Utilizing BPR slice score is shown to be effective in anatomically localized segmentation tasks with improved performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01319-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01319-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学图像深度学习的发展需要能从全身扫描中准确识别身体区域的工具,以作为下游任务的重要预处理步骤。通常情况下,这些深度学习模型依赖于标注数据和监督学习,而监督学习是劳动密集型的。然而,自监督学习的出现消除了对标签的需求,正在彻底改变这一领域。本研究的目的是比较产生身体部位回归(BPR)切片得分的自我监督模型的神经网络架构,以帮助开发解剖定位分割模型。在 MONAI/Pytorch 框架中实现了 VGG、ResNet、DenseNet、ConvNext 和 EfficientNet BPR 模型。地标器官与切片得分相关联,并根据各种器官地标的预测切片和实际切片计算平均绝对误差(MAE)。利用 BPR 切片得分开发了四个局部 DynUNet 分割模型(胸部、上腹部、下腹部和骨盆)。比较了定位模型和基线分割模型之间的骰子相似系数(DSC)。表现最好的 BPR 模型是 EfficientNet 架构,其总体 MAE 为 3.18,而 VGG 基线模型的 MAE 为 6.29。局部分割模型在 20 个器官中的 16 个器官上的表现明显优于基线模型,DSC 为 0.88。与 BPR 任务相比,增强型神经网络(如 EfficientNet)在 CT 解剖结构定位方面的性能有很大提高。事实证明,利用 BPR 切片得分可以有效地完成解剖定位分割任务,并提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical Note: Neural Network Architectures for Self-Supervised Body Part Regression Models with Automated Localized Segmentation Application.

The advancement of medical image deep learning necessitates tools that can accurately identify body regions from whole-body scans to serve as an essential pre-processing step for downstream tasks. Typically, these deep learning models rely on labeled data and supervised learning, which is labor-intensive. However, the emergence of self-supervised learning is revolutionizing the field by eliminating the need for labels. The purpose of this study was to compare neural network architectures of self-supervised models that produced a body part regression (BPR) slice score to aid in the development of anatomically localized segmentation models. VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, ConvNext, and EfficientNet BPR models were implemented in the MONAI/Pytorch framework. Landmark organs were correlated to slice scores and mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated from the predicted slice and the actual slice of various organ landmarks. Four localized DynUNet segmentation models (thorax, upper abdomen, lower abdomen, and pelvis) were developed using the BPR slice scores. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was compared between the localized and baseline segmentation models. The best performing BPR model was the EfficientNet architecture with an overall 3.18 MAE, compared to the VGG baseline model with a MAE of 6.29. The localized segmentation model significantly outperformed the baseline in 16 out of 20 organs with a DSC of 0.88. Enhanced neural networks like EfficientNet have a large performance increase in localizing anatomical structures in a CT compared in BPR task. Utilizing BPR slice score is shown to be effective in anatomically localized segmentation tasks with improved performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信