Jennifer Le Guevelou , Ayad Houssayni , Stéphane Key , Axel Largent , Caroline Lafond , Oscar Acosta , Antoine Simon , Renaud de Crevoisier , Anaïs Barateau
{"title":"确定前列腺癌体外放射治疗保留性结构的潜力:剂量学研究。","authors":"Jennifer Le Guevelou , Ayad Houssayni , Stéphane Key , Axel Largent , Caroline Lafond , Oscar Acosta , Antoine Simon , Renaud de Crevoisier , Anaïs Barateau","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of sexual-sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with magnetic resonance-only treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Fifteen consecutive patients receiving prostate cancer radiotherapy were selected. A synthetic CT was generated with a deep learning method from each T2-weighted MRI performed at the time of treatment planning. For each patient, two plans were performed: standard treatment planning and sexual-structures sparing treatment planning. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 78<!--> <!-->Gy to the prostate and 50<!--> <!-->Gy to the seminal vesicles in 2<!--> <!-->Gy daily fractions, using volumetric arc therapy. Dose–volume histograms were computed to compare treatment plans.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All plans fulfilled dosimetric objectives and were equivalent regarding planning target volume coverage. The doses delivered to both rectum, bladder, and femoral heads were similar between plans (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.20). Sexual-sparing plans enabled to decrease all dosimetric parameters on sexual organs-at-risk. The mean penile bulb dose in sexual-sparing plans was significantly reduced (21.1<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->20.7 versus 13.4<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.0, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01), however with large variability observed between individuals. The mean dose delivered to the corpora cavernosa was also significantly reduced within sexual-sparing plans (13.1<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.7 versus 8.6<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.4, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01). A significant reduction was also observed in the highest doses delivered to internal pudendal arteries (D10%: 48.4<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.3 versus 33.1<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.6, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05; D5%: 52.0<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.7 versus 36.8<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.5, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Sparing of sexual structures appears feasible, without compromising neither planning target volume coverage nor doses delivered to non-sexual organs at risk. The clinical significance of this dose-reduction requires prospective evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 8","pages":"Pages 686-692"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the potential for sexual structures-sparing for prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy: A dosimetric study\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Le Guevelou , Ayad Houssayni , Stéphane Key , Axel Largent , Caroline Lafond , Oscar Acosta , Antoine Simon , Renaud de Crevoisier , Anaïs Barateau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of sexual-sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with magnetic resonance-only treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Fifteen consecutive patients receiving prostate cancer radiotherapy were selected. A synthetic CT was generated with a deep learning method from each T2-weighted MRI performed at the time of treatment planning. For each patient, two plans were performed: standard treatment planning and sexual-structures sparing treatment planning. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 78<!--> <!-->Gy to the prostate and 50<!--> <!-->Gy to the seminal vesicles in 2<!--> <!-->Gy daily fractions, using volumetric arc therapy. Dose–volume histograms were computed to compare treatment plans.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All plans fulfilled dosimetric objectives and were equivalent regarding planning target volume coverage. The doses delivered to both rectum, bladder, and femoral heads were similar between plans (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.20). Sexual-sparing plans enabled to decrease all dosimetric parameters on sexual organs-at-risk. The mean penile bulb dose in sexual-sparing plans was significantly reduced (21.1<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->20.7 versus 13.4<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.0, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01), however with large variability observed between individuals. The mean dose delivered to the corpora cavernosa was also significantly reduced within sexual-sparing plans (13.1<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.7 versus 8.6<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.4, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01). A significant reduction was also observed in the highest doses delivered to internal pudendal arteries (D10%: 48.4<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.3 versus 33.1<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.6, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05; D5%: 52.0<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.7 versus 36.8<!--> <!-->Gy<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.5, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Sparing of sexual structures appears feasible, without compromising neither planning target volume coverage nor doses delivered to non-sexual organs at risk. The clinical significance of this dose-reduction requires prospective evaluation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Radiotherapie\",\"volume\":\"28 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 686-692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Radiotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321824001999\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Radiotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321824001999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defining the potential for sexual structures-sparing for prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy: A dosimetric study
Purpose
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of sexual-sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with magnetic resonance-only treatment planning.
Material and methods
Fifteen consecutive patients receiving prostate cancer radiotherapy were selected. A synthetic CT was generated with a deep learning method from each T2-weighted MRI performed at the time of treatment planning. For each patient, two plans were performed: standard treatment planning and sexual-structures sparing treatment planning. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 78 Gy to the prostate and 50 Gy to the seminal vesicles in 2 Gy daily fractions, using volumetric arc therapy. Dose–volume histograms were computed to compare treatment plans.
Results
All plans fulfilled dosimetric objectives and were equivalent regarding planning target volume coverage. The doses delivered to both rectum, bladder, and femoral heads were similar between plans (P = 0.20). Sexual-sparing plans enabled to decrease all dosimetric parameters on sexual organs-at-risk. The mean penile bulb dose in sexual-sparing plans was significantly reduced (21.1 Gy ± 20.7 versus 13.4 Gy ± 14.0, P < 0.01), however with large variability observed between individuals. The mean dose delivered to the corpora cavernosa was also significantly reduced within sexual-sparing plans (13.1 Gy ± 16.7 versus 8.6 Gy ± 10.4, P < 0.01). A significant reduction was also observed in the highest doses delivered to internal pudendal arteries (D10%: 48.4 Gy ± 8.3 versus 33.1 Gy ± 4.6, P < 0.05; D5%: 52.0 Gy ± 8.7 versus 36.8 Gy ± 5.5, P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Sparing of sexual structures appears feasible, without compromising neither planning target volume coverage nor doses delivered to non-sexual organs at risk. The clinical significance of this dose-reduction requires prospective evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Cancer/radiothérapie se veut d''abord et avant tout un organe francophone de publication des travaux de recherche en radiothérapie. La revue a pour objectif de diffuser les informations majeures sur les travaux de recherche en cancérologie et tout ce qui touche de près ou de loin au traitement du cancer par les radiations : technologie, radiophysique, radiobiologie et radiothérapie clinique.