通过固相萃取和随后的比色分析评估海水中海洋表面活性剂的萃取和定量。

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
ACS ES&T water Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1021/acsestwater.4c00497
Rachel L Bramblett, Amanda A Frossard
{"title":"通过固相萃取和随后的比色分析评估海水中海洋表面活性剂的萃取和定量。","authors":"Rachel L Bramblett, Amanda A Frossard","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c00497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules that adsorb to interfaces and affect the interfacial tension. Surfactants in seawater can impact gas-exchange, surface properties, and the composition and fate of sea spray aerosol. The accurate quantification of surfactants and their classes is crucial to constraining the effect of surfactants in seawater and their role in air-sea exchanges. Here, we evaluate and optimize a solid phase extraction (SPE) method paired with colorimetry and UV-vis spectroscopy to quantify the concentrations of anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants in seawater. We compare tandem SPE with two-step SPE and different elution volumes and evaluate the impact of different interferents. Improved extraction efficiencies were obtained with an 8 mL acetonitrile elution and with separate ENVI-18 and ENVI-Carb extractions, instead of tandem. With complex surfactant mixtures, the presence of anionic surfactants interfered with the quantification of cationic surfactants and caused underestimations of up to 83%. Using a two-step extraction and analyzing each seawater SPE extract separately during colorimetric quantification help avoid the effects of interferents and ensure more representative quantification of surfactants. With this method, average seawater surfactant concentrations ranged from 0.04 to 0.06 μM. At the highest concentrations, the class composition comprised 23% anionic, 21% cationic, and 56% nonionic surfactants.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"4 11","pages":"4836-4846"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Extraction and Quantification of Marine Surfactants from Seawater through Solid Phase Extraction and Subsequent Colorimetric Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel L Bramblett, Amanda A Frossard\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestwater.4c00497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules that adsorb to interfaces and affect the interfacial tension. Surfactants in seawater can impact gas-exchange, surface properties, and the composition and fate of sea spray aerosol. The accurate quantification of surfactants and their classes is crucial to constraining the effect of surfactants in seawater and their role in air-sea exchanges. Here, we evaluate and optimize a solid phase extraction (SPE) method paired with colorimetry and UV-vis spectroscopy to quantify the concentrations of anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants in seawater. We compare tandem SPE with two-step SPE and different elution volumes and evaluate the impact of different interferents. Improved extraction efficiencies were obtained with an 8 mL acetonitrile elution and with separate ENVI-18 and ENVI-Carb extractions, instead of tandem. With complex surfactant mixtures, the presence of anionic surfactants interfered with the quantification of cationic surfactants and caused underestimations of up to 83%. Using a two-step extraction and analyzing each seawater SPE extract separately during colorimetric quantification help avoid the effects of interferents and ensure more representative quantification of surfactants. With this method, average seawater surfactant concentrations ranged from 0.04 to 0.06 μM. At the highest concentrations, the class composition comprised 23% anionic, 21% cationic, and 56% nonionic surfactants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"volume\":\"4 11\",\"pages\":\"4836-4846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

表面活性剂是两亲性分子,可吸附在界面上并影响界面张力。海水中的表面活性剂会影响气体交换、表面特性以及海雾气溶胶的成分和归宿。准确量化表面活性剂及其类别对于限制海水中表面活性剂的影响及其在海气交换中的作用至关重要。在此,我们评估并优化了一种固相萃取 (SPE) 方法,并将其与比色法和紫外-可见光谱法搭配使用,以量化海水中阴离子、阳离子和非离子表面活性剂的浓度。我们比较了串联固相萃取和两步固相萃取以及不同的洗脱体积,并评估了不同干扰物的影响。采用 8 mL 乙腈洗脱,并分别进行 ENVI-18 和 ENVI-Carb 萃取,而不是串联萃取,提高了萃取效率。在复杂的表面活性剂混合物中,阴离子表面活性剂的存在会干扰阳离子表面活性剂的定量,造成高达 83% 的低估。使用两步萃取法和在比色定量时单独分析每种海水固相萃取物有助于避免干扰物的影响,确保表面活性剂的定量更具代表性。采用这种方法,海水表面活性剂的平均浓度在 0.04 至 0.06 μM 之间。在最高浓度下,该类表面活性剂包括 23% 的阴离子表面活性剂、21% 的阳离子表面活性剂和 56% 的非离子表面活性剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Extraction and Quantification of Marine Surfactants from Seawater through Solid Phase Extraction and Subsequent Colorimetric Analyses.

Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules that adsorb to interfaces and affect the interfacial tension. Surfactants in seawater can impact gas-exchange, surface properties, and the composition and fate of sea spray aerosol. The accurate quantification of surfactants and their classes is crucial to constraining the effect of surfactants in seawater and their role in air-sea exchanges. Here, we evaluate and optimize a solid phase extraction (SPE) method paired with colorimetry and UV-vis spectroscopy to quantify the concentrations of anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants in seawater. We compare tandem SPE with two-step SPE and different elution volumes and evaluate the impact of different interferents. Improved extraction efficiencies were obtained with an 8 mL acetonitrile elution and with separate ENVI-18 and ENVI-Carb extractions, instead of tandem. With complex surfactant mixtures, the presence of anionic surfactants interfered with the quantification of cationic surfactants and caused underestimations of up to 83%. Using a two-step extraction and analyzing each seawater SPE extract separately during colorimetric quantification help avoid the effects of interferents and ensure more representative quantification of surfactants. With this method, average seawater surfactant concentrations ranged from 0.04 to 0.06 μM. At the highest concentrations, the class composition comprised 23% anionic, 21% cationic, and 56% nonionic surfactants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信