美国成年人获取和使用数字医疗的模式:潜类分析。

BMC digital health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1186/s44247-024-00100-0
Phillip Hegeman, Daniel Vader, Kristyn Kamke, Sherine El-Toukhy
{"title":"美国成年人获取和使用数字医疗的模式:潜类分析。","authors":"Phillip Hegeman, Daniel Vader, Kristyn Kamke, Sherine El-Toukhy","doi":"10.1186/s44247-024-00100-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital technologies allow users to engage in health-related behaviors associated with positive outcomes. We aimed to identify classes of US adults with distinct digital technologies access and health use patterns and characterize class composition. Data came from Health Information National Trends Survey Wave 5 Cycles 1-4, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of US adults (<i>N</i>=13,993). We used latent class analysis to identify digital technologies access and health use patterns based on 32 ternary variables of behaviors and access to requisite technologies and platforms, including the internet, internet-enabled devices, health monitors, and electronic health records (EHRs). We ran a multinomial logistic regression to identify sociodemographic and health correlates of class membership (<i>n</i>=10,734).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten classes captured patterns of digital technology access and health use among US adults. This included a digitally isolated, a mobile-dependent, and a super user class, which made up 8.9%, 7.8%, and 13.6% of US adults, respectively, and captured access patterns from only basic cellphones and health monitors to near complete access to web-, mobile-, and EHR-based platforms. Half of US adults belonged to classes that lacked access to EHRs and relied on alternative web-based tools typical of patient portals. The proportion of class members who used digital technologies for health purposes varied from small to large. Older and less educated adults had lower odds of belonging to classes characterized by access or engagement in health behaviors. Hispanic and Asian adults had higher odds of belonging to the mobile-dependent class. Individuals without a regular healthcare provider and those who had not visited a provider in the past year were more likely to belong to classes with limited digital technologies access or health use.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only one third of US adults belonged to classes that had near complete access to digital technologies and whose members engaged in almost all health behaviors examined. Sex, age, and education were associated with membership in classes that lacked access to 1+ digital technologies or exhibited none to limited health uses of such technologies. Results can guide efforts to improve access and health use of digital technologies to maximize associated health benefits and minimize disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of digital health access and use among US adults: A latent class analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip Hegeman, Daniel Vader, Kristyn Kamke, Sherine El-Toukhy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44247-024-00100-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital technologies allow users to engage in health-related behaviors associated with positive outcomes. We aimed to identify classes of US adults with distinct digital technologies access and health use patterns and characterize class composition. Data came from Health Information National Trends Survey Wave 5 Cycles 1-4, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of US adults (<i>N</i>=13,993). We used latent class analysis to identify digital technologies access and health use patterns based on 32 ternary variables of behaviors and access to requisite technologies and platforms, including the internet, internet-enabled devices, health monitors, and electronic health records (EHRs). We ran a multinomial logistic regression to identify sociodemographic and health correlates of class membership (<i>n</i>=10,734).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten classes captured patterns of digital technology access and health use among US adults. This included a digitally isolated, a mobile-dependent, and a super user class, which made up 8.9%, 7.8%, and 13.6% of US adults, respectively, and captured access patterns from only basic cellphones and health monitors to near complete access to web-, mobile-, and EHR-based platforms. Half of US adults belonged to classes that lacked access to EHRs and relied on alternative web-based tools typical of patient portals. The proportion of class members who used digital technologies for health purposes varied from small to large. Older and less educated adults had lower odds of belonging to classes characterized by access or engagement in health behaviors. Hispanic and Asian adults had higher odds of belonging to the mobile-dependent class. Individuals without a regular healthcare provider and those who had not visited a provider in the past year were more likely to belong to classes with limited digital technologies access or health use.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only one third of US adults belonged to classes that had near complete access to digital technologies and whose members engaged in almost all health behaviors examined. Sex, age, and education were associated with membership in classes that lacked access to 1+ digital technologies or exhibited none to limited health uses of such technologies. Results can guide efforts to improve access and health use of digital technologies to maximize associated health benefits and minimize disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC digital health\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562959/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-024-00100-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-024-00100-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字技术使用户能够从事与健康相关的行为,从而获得积极的结果。我们的目标是找出具有不同数字技术访问和健康使用模式的美国成年人阶层,并描述阶层构成的特点。数据来源于健康信息全国趋势调查第 5 波第 1-4 周期,这是一项对美国成年人进行的具有全国代表性的横断面调查(N=13,993)。我们采用潜类分析法,根据行为和访问必要技术和平台(包括互联网、互联网设备、健康监测仪和电子健康记录 (EHR))的 32 个三元变量来识别数字技术访问和健康使用模式。我们进行了多项式逻辑回归,以确定类别成员的社会人口和健康相关因素(n=10,734):结果:十个类别反映了美国成年人的数字技术访问和健康使用模式。其中包括数字孤立用户、移动依赖用户和超级用户,分别占美国成年人的8.9%、7.8%和13.6%,其访问模式从仅使用基本的手机和健康监测器到几乎完全访问基于网络、移动和电子病历的平台。半数美国成年人属于无法使用电子病历的群体,他们依赖于其他基于网络的工具,如典型的患者门户网站。将数字技术用于健康目的的群体成员比例有大有小。年龄较大和受教育程度较低的成年人属于以获取或参与健康行为为特征的阶层的几率较低。西班牙裔和亚裔成年人属于依赖移动设备的群体的几率更高。没有固定医疗服务提供者和在过去一年中没有就诊过医疗服务提供者的人更有可能属于数字技术获取或健康使用有限的阶层:讨论:只有三分之一的美国成年人属于几乎可以完全使用数字技术的阶层,这些阶层的成员几乎参与了所有的健康行为调查。性别、年龄和教育程度与是否属于无法使用 1 种以上数字技术或对此类技术的健康用途不明确或有限的阶层有关。研究结果可以为改善数字技术的获取和健康使用提供指导,从而最大限度地提高相关的健康效益,缩小差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of digital health access and use among US adults: A latent class analysis.

Background: Digital technologies allow users to engage in health-related behaviors associated with positive outcomes. We aimed to identify classes of US adults with distinct digital technologies access and health use patterns and characterize class composition. Data came from Health Information National Trends Survey Wave 5 Cycles 1-4, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of US adults (N=13,993). We used latent class analysis to identify digital technologies access and health use patterns based on 32 ternary variables of behaviors and access to requisite technologies and platforms, including the internet, internet-enabled devices, health monitors, and electronic health records (EHRs). We ran a multinomial logistic regression to identify sociodemographic and health correlates of class membership (n=10,734).

Results: Ten classes captured patterns of digital technology access and health use among US adults. This included a digitally isolated, a mobile-dependent, and a super user class, which made up 8.9%, 7.8%, and 13.6% of US adults, respectively, and captured access patterns from only basic cellphones and health monitors to near complete access to web-, mobile-, and EHR-based platforms. Half of US adults belonged to classes that lacked access to EHRs and relied on alternative web-based tools typical of patient portals. The proportion of class members who used digital technologies for health purposes varied from small to large. Older and less educated adults had lower odds of belonging to classes characterized by access or engagement in health behaviors. Hispanic and Asian adults had higher odds of belonging to the mobile-dependent class. Individuals without a regular healthcare provider and those who had not visited a provider in the past year were more likely to belong to classes with limited digital technologies access or health use.

Discussion: Only one third of US adults belonged to classes that had near complete access to digital technologies and whose members engaged in almost all health behaviors examined. Sex, age, and education were associated with membership in classes that lacked access to 1+ digital technologies or exhibited none to limited health uses of such technologies. Results can guide efforts to improve access and health use of digital technologies to maximize associated health benefits and minimize disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信