全身关节松弛会增加三角纤维软骨复合物关节镜修复术后远端无线电-Unlar关节失稳的复发风险。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ji Sup Kim, Kyeong-Eon Kim, Shin-Woo Lee, Soyoung Jeon, Hyejin Yang, Yun-Rak Choi
{"title":"全身关节松弛会增加三角纤维软骨复合物关节镜修复术后远端无线电-Unlar关节失稳的复发风险。","authors":"Ji Sup Kim, Kyeong-Eon Kim, Shin-Woo Lee, Soyoung Jeon, Hyejin Yang, Yun-Rak Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical results of the arthroscopic foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) for distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) instability in patients with or without generalized joint laxity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent arthroscopic transosseous foveal TFCC repair of Palmer 1B foveal TFCC tears (Atzei classification class II or III) from January 2018 to October 2021 were identified. Patients treated for symptomatic DRUJ instability for more than 3 months, and with at least 2 years of follow-up, were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the Beighton and Horan criteria: those with generalized joint laxity (group L) and those without (group N). Clinical outcomes were measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, modified Mayo wrist score (MMWS), wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, sports/recreation activity level, recurrent DRUJ instability, and achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCID).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred-and-twenty patients (Group L, 51 patients; Group N, 69 patients) were included. Both groups showed significant improvements in preoperative DASH and MMWS at the final follow-up. Overall, 103 patients (85.8%) achieved MCID, with 82.4% in Group L and 88.4% in Group N, and no significant differences between the two groups (P = .347). At the final follow-up, ROM and sports/recreation activity levels were similar between the groups. Significantly, the rates of postoperative DRUJ instability recurrence were 17.7% in group L (9/51) and 5.8% in group N (4/69) (P=0.039). Beighton scores were an independent risk factor for recurrent DRUJ instability in the multivariable analysis (P=0.024; odds ratio=1.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic TFCC foveal repair in patients with generalized joint laxity are comparable to those without, with 82.4% achieving MCID. Generalized joint laxity impacts DRUJ instability recurrence over a minimum two-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalized Joint Laxity Increases the Risk of Recurrence of Distal Radio-Ulnar Joint Instability after Arthroscopic Foveal Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Sup Kim, Kyeong-Eon Kim, Shin-Woo Lee, Soyoung Jeon, Hyejin Yang, Yun-Rak Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical results of the arthroscopic foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) for distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) instability in patients with or without generalized joint laxity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent arthroscopic transosseous foveal TFCC repair of Palmer 1B foveal TFCC tears (Atzei classification class II or III) from January 2018 to October 2021 were identified. Patients treated for symptomatic DRUJ instability for more than 3 months, and with at least 2 years of follow-up, were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the Beighton and Horan criteria: those with generalized joint laxity (group L) and those without (group N). Clinical outcomes were measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, modified Mayo wrist score (MMWS), wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, sports/recreation activity level, recurrent DRUJ instability, and achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCID).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred-and-twenty patients (Group L, 51 patients; Group N, 69 patients) were included. Both groups showed significant improvements in preoperative DASH and MMWS at the final follow-up. Overall, 103 patients (85.8%) achieved MCID, with 82.4% in Group L and 88.4% in Group N, and no significant differences between the two groups (P = .347). At the final follow-up, ROM and sports/recreation activity levels were similar between the groups. Significantly, the rates of postoperative DRUJ instability recurrence were 17.7% in group L (9/51) and 5.8% in group N (4/69) (P=0.039). Beighton scores were an independent risk factor for recurrent DRUJ instability in the multivariable analysis (P=0.024; odds ratio=1.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic TFCC foveal repair in patients with generalized joint laxity are comparable to those without, with 82.4% achieving MCID. Generalized joint laxity impacts DRUJ instability recurrence over a minimum two-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.040\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较有或无全身关节松弛的患者在关节镜下对三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)进行修复以治疗远端无线电尺关节(DRUJ)不稳定的临床效果:确定了2018年1月至2021年10月期间接受帕尔默1B型窝状TFCC撕裂(阿泽伊分类II级或III级)关节镜经窝TFCC修复术的患者。纳入了因症状性 DRUJ 不稳定接受治疗超过 3 个月、随访至少 2 年的患者。根据 Beighton 和 Horan 标准将患者分为两组:有全身关节松弛的患者(L 组)和无全身关节松弛的患者(N 组)。临床结果通过手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)评分、改良梅奥腕部评分(MMWS)、腕部活动范围(ROM)、握力、运动/娱乐活动水平、复发性DRUJ不稳定性以及最小临床重要性差异(MCID)的实现情况来衡量:共纳入 120 名患者(L 组 51 名,N 组 69 名)。两组患者在术前 DASH 和 MMWS 的最终随访中均有明显改善。总体而言,103 名患者(85.8%)达到了 MCID,其中 L 组为 82.4%,N 组为 88.4%,两组之间无明显差异(P = .347)。在最后的随访中,两组患者的 ROM 和运动/娱乐活动水平相似。值得注意的是,L组术后DRUJ不稳复发率为17.7%(9/51),N组为5.8%(4/69)(P=0.039)。在多变量分析中,Beighton评分是DRUJ不稳复发的独立风险因素(P=0.024;几率比=1.62):结论:全身关节松弛患者在关节镜下进行TFCC窝状修复术后的临床疗效与非全身关节松弛患者相当,82.4%的患者达到了MCID。在至少两年的随访期内,全身关节松弛会影响DRUJ失稳的复发:证据级别:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generalized Joint Laxity Increases the Risk of Recurrence of Distal Radio-Ulnar Joint Instability after Arthroscopic Foveal Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex.

Purpose: To compare the clinical results of the arthroscopic foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) for distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) instability in patients with or without generalized joint laxity.

Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic transosseous foveal TFCC repair of Palmer 1B foveal TFCC tears (Atzei classification class II or III) from January 2018 to October 2021 were identified. Patients treated for symptomatic DRUJ instability for more than 3 months, and with at least 2 years of follow-up, were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the Beighton and Horan criteria: those with generalized joint laxity (group L) and those without (group N). Clinical outcomes were measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, modified Mayo wrist score (MMWS), wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, sports/recreation activity level, recurrent DRUJ instability, and achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCID).

Results: One-hundred-and-twenty patients (Group L, 51 patients; Group N, 69 patients) were included. Both groups showed significant improvements in preoperative DASH and MMWS at the final follow-up. Overall, 103 patients (85.8%) achieved MCID, with 82.4% in Group L and 88.4% in Group N, and no significant differences between the two groups (P = .347). At the final follow-up, ROM and sports/recreation activity levels were similar between the groups. Significantly, the rates of postoperative DRUJ instability recurrence were 17.7% in group L (9/51) and 5.8% in group N (4/69) (P=0.039). Beighton scores were an independent risk factor for recurrent DRUJ instability in the multivariable analysis (P=0.024; odds ratio=1.62).

Conclusions: Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic TFCC foveal repair in patients with generalized joint laxity are comparable to those without, with 82.4% achieving MCID. Generalized joint laxity impacts DRUJ instability recurrence over a minimum two-year follow-up period.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信