能否利用实施促进将循证心理健康干预措施实施到已有的家访计划中?三变量实施效果背景混合试验研究方案。

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elissa Z Faro, DeShauna Jones, Morolake Adeagbo, Hyunkeun Cho, Grace Swartzendruber, Karen M Tabb, S Darius Tandon, Kelli Ryckman
{"title":"能否利用实施促进将循证心理健康干预措施实施到已有的家访计划中?三变量实施效果背景混合试验研究方案。","authors":"Elissa Z Faro, DeShauna Jones, Morolake Adeagbo, Hyunkeun Cho, Grace Swartzendruber, Karen M Tabb, S Darius Tandon, Kelli Ryckman","doi":"10.1186/s13012-024-01402-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal mental health conditions are the most common complication of pregnancy and childbirth (1 in 8 women). When left untreated, perinatal depression and anxiety adversely affects the entire family with pregnancy complications and negative outcomes including preterm birth, impaired mother-infant bonding, impaired lactation, substance abuse, divorce, suicide, and infanticide. Significant disparities persist in the diagnosis and treatment of perinatal depression and anxiety and these inequities are often intersectional. Preliminary research with stakeholders including community advisory boards, underrepresented and minority birthing people, and state departments of health, demonstrates the importance of social support as a mechanism for reducing disparities in perinatal depression, particularly in rural geographies. Home visiting programs (HVPs) can provide the social support needed to improve mental health outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women. Our project aims to explore the impact of context on the implementation of a mental health intervention, focusing on the lived experiences of diverse populations served by HVPs to reduce disparities in adverse maternal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using implementation facilitation, our study will engage multilevel stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, front-line implementers, and intervention recipients) to adapt facilitation to integrate a maternal mental health intervention (i.e., Mothers and Babies) across two midwestern, rural states (Iowa and Indiana) with multiple HVP models. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of the contexts in which Mothers and Babies will be integrated, a three variable hybrid implementation-effectiveness-context trial will test the adapted facilitation strategy compared with implementation as usual (i.e., standard education) and will assess contextual factors related to the outcomes. Using an evidence-based implementation strategy that tailors implementation delivery to the needs of the specific populations and context may improve fidelity and adoption, particularly in rural states where residents have limited access to care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The immediate impact of this research will be to show whether adapted facilitation can improve the uptake and fidelity of Mothers and Babies across multiple HVP models and thus positively affect depressive symptoms and perceived stress of recipients. Our implementation protocol may be used by researchers, practitioners, and policy makers to better integrate evidence-based interventions into diverse contexts, leading to more equitable implementation and improved health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06575894, registered on August 29, 2024 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06575894?id=NCT06575894&rank=1 .</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can an evidence-based mental health intervention be implemented into preexisting home visiting programs using implementation facilitation? Study protocol for a three variable implementation effectiveness context hybrid trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elissa Z Faro, DeShauna Jones, Morolake Adeagbo, Hyunkeun Cho, Grace Swartzendruber, Karen M Tabb, S Darius Tandon, Kelli Ryckman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13012-024-01402-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal mental health conditions are the most common complication of pregnancy and childbirth (1 in 8 women). When left untreated, perinatal depression and anxiety adversely affects the entire family with pregnancy complications and negative outcomes including preterm birth, impaired mother-infant bonding, impaired lactation, substance abuse, divorce, suicide, and infanticide. Significant disparities persist in the diagnosis and treatment of perinatal depression and anxiety and these inequities are often intersectional. Preliminary research with stakeholders including community advisory boards, underrepresented and minority birthing people, and state departments of health, demonstrates the importance of social support as a mechanism for reducing disparities in perinatal depression, particularly in rural geographies. Home visiting programs (HVPs) can provide the social support needed to improve mental health outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women. Our project aims to explore the impact of context on the implementation of a mental health intervention, focusing on the lived experiences of diverse populations served by HVPs to reduce disparities in adverse maternal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using implementation facilitation, our study will engage multilevel stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, front-line implementers, and intervention recipients) to adapt facilitation to integrate a maternal mental health intervention (i.e., Mothers and Babies) across two midwestern, rural states (Iowa and Indiana) with multiple HVP models. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of the contexts in which Mothers and Babies will be integrated, a three variable hybrid implementation-effectiveness-context trial will test the adapted facilitation strategy compared with implementation as usual (i.e., standard education) and will assess contextual factors related to the outcomes. Using an evidence-based implementation strategy that tailors implementation delivery to the needs of the specific populations and context may improve fidelity and adoption, particularly in rural states where residents have limited access to care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The immediate impact of this research will be to show whether adapted facilitation can improve the uptake and fidelity of Mothers and Babies across multiple HVP models and thus positively affect depressive symptoms and perceived stress of recipients. Our implementation protocol may be used by researchers, practitioners, and policy makers to better integrate evidence-based interventions into diverse contexts, leading to more equitable implementation and improved health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06575894, registered on August 29, 2024 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06575894?id=NCT06575894&rank=1 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation Science\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01402-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01402-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围产期精神健康状况是妊娠和分娩最常见的并发症(每 8 名妇女中就有 1 名)。如果不及时治疗,围产期抑郁和焦虑症会对整个家庭产生不利影响,导致妊娠并发症和不良后果,包括早产、母婴关系受损、哺乳受损、药物滥用、离婚、自杀和杀婴。在围产期抑郁和焦虑症的诊断和治疗方面仍然存在着巨大的差异,而且这些不平等往往是交叉性的。与利益相关者(包括社区咨询委员会、代表性不足和少数族裔的分娩者以及州卫生部门)进行的初步研究表明,社会支持作为减少围产期抑郁症差异的一种机制非常重要,尤其是在农村地区。家访项目(HVPs)可以提供改善孕妇和产后妇女心理健康结果所需的社会支持。我们的项目旨在探索背景对实施心理健康干预措施的影响,重点关注家访项目所服务的不同人群的生活经历,以减少不良孕产结果的差异:方法:我们的研究将采用实施促进的方法,让多层次的利益相关者(如政策制定者、一线实施者和干预接受者)参与进来,以调整促进方法,在两个中西部农村州(爱荷华州和印第安纳州)整合孕产妇心理健康干预措施(即 "母亲和婴儿"),并采用多种保健志愿服务模式。鉴于 "母亲与婴儿 "项目所处环境的复杂性和异质性,一项实施效果-环境三变量混合试验将对调整后的促进策略与常规实施(即标准教育)进行对比测试,并将评估与结果相关的环境因素。使用基于证据的实施策略,根据特定人群和环境的需求量身定制实施方法,可能会提高实施的忠实度和采用率,尤其是在农村地区,因为那里的居民获得医疗服务的机会有限:讨论:本研究的直接影响将是表明经过调整的促进方法是否能提高多种保健志愿服务模式对 "母亲和婴儿 "的采纳率和忠实度,从而对受助者的抑郁症状和感知压力产生积极影响。我们的实施方案可供研究人员、从业人员和政策制定者使用,以更好地将循证干预措施整合到不同的环境中,从而实现更公平的实施和更好的健康结果:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT06575894,注册日期:2024 年 8 月 29 日 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06575894?id=NCT06575894&rank=1 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can an evidence-based mental health intervention be implemented into preexisting home visiting programs using implementation facilitation? Study protocol for a three variable implementation effectiveness context hybrid trial.

Background: Perinatal mental health conditions are the most common complication of pregnancy and childbirth (1 in 8 women). When left untreated, perinatal depression and anxiety adversely affects the entire family with pregnancy complications and negative outcomes including preterm birth, impaired mother-infant bonding, impaired lactation, substance abuse, divorce, suicide, and infanticide. Significant disparities persist in the diagnosis and treatment of perinatal depression and anxiety and these inequities are often intersectional. Preliminary research with stakeholders including community advisory boards, underrepresented and minority birthing people, and state departments of health, demonstrates the importance of social support as a mechanism for reducing disparities in perinatal depression, particularly in rural geographies. Home visiting programs (HVPs) can provide the social support needed to improve mental health outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women. Our project aims to explore the impact of context on the implementation of a mental health intervention, focusing on the lived experiences of diverse populations served by HVPs to reduce disparities in adverse maternal outcomes.

Methods: Using implementation facilitation, our study will engage multilevel stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, front-line implementers, and intervention recipients) to adapt facilitation to integrate a maternal mental health intervention (i.e., Mothers and Babies) across two midwestern, rural states (Iowa and Indiana) with multiple HVP models. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of the contexts in which Mothers and Babies will be integrated, a three variable hybrid implementation-effectiveness-context trial will test the adapted facilitation strategy compared with implementation as usual (i.e., standard education) and will assess contextual factors related to the outcomes. Using an evidence-based implementation strategy that tailors implementation delivery to the needs of the specific populations and context may improve fidelity and adoption, particularly in rural states where residents have limited access to care.

Discussion: The immediate impact of this research will be to show whether adapted facilitation can improve the uptake and fidelity of Mothers and Babies across multiple HVP models and thus positively affect depressive symptoms and perceived stress of recipients. Our implementation protocol may be used by researchers, practitioners, and policy makers to better integrate evidence-based interventions into diverse contexts, leading to more equitable implementation and improved health outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06575894, registered on August 29, 2024 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06575894?id=NCT06575894&rank=1 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信