为晚期肾细胞癌护理的定制护理培训(RCC4Nurses)奠定基础:一项国际前瞻性研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Celia Diez De Los Rios de la Serna , Constantina Papadopoulou , Amanda Drury , Wendy Oldenmenger , Theresa Wiseman , Daniel Kelly , Grigorios Kotronoulas
{"title":"为晚期肾细胞癌护理的定制护理培训(RCC4Nurses)奠定基础:一项国际前瞻性研究。","authors":"Celia Diez De Los Rios de la Serna ,&nbsp;Constantina Papadopoulou ,&nbsp;Amanda Drury ,&nbsp;Wendy Oldenmenger ,&nbsp;Theresa Wiseman ,&nbsp;Daniel Kelly ,&nbsp;Grigorios Kotronoulas","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Nurses require specialist knowledge and skills to effectively support an increasing population of people affected by advanced renal cell cancer (aRCC). RCC4Nurses was a three-phase project that aimed to develop bespoke training in aRCC for nurses in Europe. Phase 1 examined pre-existing educational programs in kidney cancer, then developed a curriculum of core education topics in aRCC care to suit generalist and specialist nurses’ education needs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Phase 1 employed a prospective design that involved two parts. Part 1 was a scoping review of educational programs developed for multidisciplinary health professionals in kidney cancer/RCC. Findings of Part 1 formed the basis for Part 2, which was a three-round Delphi study that involved experts by personal experience or profession in aRCC, who rated the importance of a range of education topics and education methods for inclusion in the developing RCC4Nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The scoping review identified eight education programs via two published reports and six online resources. Existing programs had limitations in accessibility, recency and target professional groups; none of them was developed specifically for nurses. Program content was primarily focused on diagnostic, treatment and management procedures in kidney cancer. Fourteen educational topics were derived from the review and evaluated during Round 1 of the Delphi by 47 experts. By Round 3, 17 topics had iteratively reached consensus for inclusion within RCC4Nurses. Experts showed preference to problem-solving and clinical-scenario learning methods, but not reflective practice learning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Given the dearth of up-to-date, evidence-based training for nurses in aRCC, we have prepared the ground to develop a bespoke training course in this area of practice.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>The RCC4Nurses project will offer accessible, state-of-the-art education to registered nurses in Europe to help enhance nursing competency in aRCC and enhance the standard of care provided to people affected by aRCC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"40 6","pages":"Article 151749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparing the ground for bespoke nursing training in advanced renal cell carcinoma care (RCC4Nurses): An international prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Celia Diez De Los Rios de la Serna ,&nbsp;Constantina Papadopoulou ,&nbsp;Amanda Drury ,&nbsp;Wendy Oldenmenger ,&nbsp;Theresa Wiseman ,&nbsp;Daniel Kelly ,&nbsp;Grigorios Kotronoulas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Nurses require specialist knowledge and skills to effectively support an increasing population of people affected by advanced renal cell cancer (aRCC). RCC4Nurses was a three-phase project that aimed to develop bespoke training in aRCC for nurses in Europe. Phase 1 examined pre-existing educational programs in kidney cancer, then developed a curriculum of core education topics in aRCC care to suit generalist and specialist nurses’ education needs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Phase 1 employed a prospective design that involved two parts. Part 1 was a scoping review of educational programs developed for multidisciplinary health professionals in kidney cancer/RCC. Findings of Part 1 formed the basis for Part 2, which was a three-round Delphi study that involved experts by personal experience or profession in aRCC, who rated the importance of a range of education topics and education methods for inclusion in the developing RCC4Nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The scoping review identified eight education programs via two published reports and six online resources. Existing programs had limitations in accessibility, recency and target professional groups; none of them was developed specifically for nurses. Program content was primarily focused on diagnostic, treatment and management procedures in kidney cancer. Fourteen educational topics were derived from the review and evaluated during Round 1 of the Delphi by 47 experts. By Round 3, 17 topics had iteratively reached consensus for inclusion within RCC4Nurses. Experts showed preference to problem-solving and clinical-scenario learning methods, but not reflective practice learning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Given the dearth of up-to-date, evidence-based training for nurses in aRCC, we have prepared the ground to develop a bespoke training course in this area of practice.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>The RCC4Nurses project will offer accessible, state-of-the-art education to registered nurses in Europe to help enhance nursing competency in aRCC and enhance the standard of care provided to people affected by aRCC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 151749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074920812400233X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074920812400233X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:护士需要具备专业知识和技能,才能为越来越多的晚期肾细胞癌(aRCC)患者提供有效支持。RCC4Nurses是一个分三个阶段进行的项目,旨在为欧洲的护士开发定制的aRCC培训。第一阶段研究了现有的肾癌教育计划,然后开发了 aRCC 护理核心教育主题课程,以满足全科和专科护士的教育需求:第一阶段采用前瞻性设计,包括两个部分。第一部分是对为肾癌/RCC 多学科医疗专业人员开发的教育项目进行范围界定。第 1 部分的研究结果为第 2 部分的研究奠定了基础,第 2 部分是一项三轮德尔菲研究,由具有肾癌/红斑狼疮专业经验或职业的专家参与,他们对一系列教育主题和教育方法的重要性进行评分,以便纳入正在开发的 RCC4Nurses 中:范围界定审查通过两份出版报告和六份在线资源确定了八项教育计划。现有计划在可及性、重复性和目标专业群体方面存在局限性;没有一个计划是专门为护士开发的。课程内容主要侧重于肾癌的诊断、治疗和管理程序。在第一轮德尔菲法中,47 位专家对审查得出的 14 个教育主题进行了评估。到第 3 轮时,17 个主题反复达成共识,将纳入 RCC4Nurses。专家们倾向于问题解决和临床情景学习方法,但不倾向于反思性实践学习:结论:鉴于缺乏对护士进行以证据为基础的急性心肌梗死最新培训,我们已为开发这一实践领域的定制培训课程做好了准备:RCC4Nurses 项目将为欧洲的注册护士提供便捷、先进的教育,帮助他们提高 aRCC 方面的护理能力,并提高为 aRCC 患者提供护理的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preparing the ground for bespoke nursing training in advanced renal cell carcinoma care (RCC4Nurses): An international prospective study

Objectives

Nurses require specialist knowledge and skills to effectively support an increasing population of people affected by advanced renal cell cancer (aRCC). RCC4Nurses was a three-phase project that aimed to develop bespoke training in aRCC for nurses in Europe. Phase 1 examined pre-existing educational programs in kidney cancer, then developed a curriculum of core education topics in aRCC care to suit generalist and specialist nurses’ education needs.

Methods

Phase 1 employed a prospective design that involved two parts. Part 1 was a scoping review of educational programs developed for multidisciplinary health professionals in kidney cancer/RCC. Findings of Part 1 formed the basis for Part 2, which was a three-round Delphi study that involved experts by personal experience or profession in aRCC, who rated the importance of a range of education topics and education methods for inclusion in the developing RCC4Nurses.

Results

The scoping review identified eight education programs via two published reports and six online resources. Existing programs had limitations in accessibility, recency and target professional groups; none of them was developed specifically for nurses. Program content was primarily focused on diagnostic, treatment and management procedures in kidney cancer. Fourteen educational topics were derived from the review and evaluated during Round 1 of the Delphi by 47 experts. By Round 3, 17 topics had iteratively reached consensus for inclusion within RCC4Nurses. Experts showed preference to problem-solving and clinical-scenario learning methods, but not reflective practice learning.

Conclusions

Given the dearth of up-to-date, evidence-based training for nurses in aRCC, we have prepared the ground to develop a bespoke training course in this area of practice.

Implications for Nursing Practice

The RCC4Nurses project will offer accessible, state-of-the-art education to registered nurses in Europe to help enhance nursing competency in aRCC and enhance the standard of care provided to people affected by aRCC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信