三相骨闪烁扫描对诊断手部 CRPS 毫无用处,还可能延误手术治疗。

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Francisco Del Piñal, Jin Xi Lim, Daniel C Williams, Jaime S Rúas, Alexis T Studer
{"title":"三相骨闪烁扫描对诊断手部 CRPS 毫无用处,还可能延误手术治疗。","authors":"Francisco Del Piñal, Jin Xi Lim, Daniel C Williams, Jaime S Rúas, Alexis T Studer","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Triphasic bone scintigraphy (TPBS) is often used to diagnose complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The primary aim of this study is to determine if the diagnosis of CRPS in patients with a positive TPBS (TPBS +ve) is accurate. A secondary aim is to determine if there was delay in treatment of patients who underwent TPBS compared to those who did not have a TPBS. <b>Methods:</b> Of 225 consecutive patients presenting to the first author's practice with a diagnosis of CRPS, 65 had TPBS performed before referral with 62 having TPBS +ve. The remaining 160 were clinically diagnosed and a TPBS was not done (TPBS-ND). Patients were classified into five categories - wrong diagnosis, dystonic-psychogenic hand, causalgia, flare reaction and irritative carpal tunnel syndrome (ICTS). Patients with flare reaction and ICTS were considered as having true CRPS and the rest were considered as misdiagnosis. The patients' demographics, duration of symptoms, pre- and postoperative pain, functional score and patient satisfaction were compared. <b>Results:</b> Of the 62 TPBS +ve, there were 38 (61%) misdiagnosis. The proportion of misdiagnoses was fewer in the TPBS-ND group (45%; <i>p</i> = 0.036). Thirty-two of the 62 TPBS group (52%) and 92/160 (56%) of the TPBS-ND group had surgical treatment. At a mean follow-up of 19 months, pain dropped 6.5 ± 2.5 points in the TPBS +ve group. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score fell by 56 ± 27. The mean single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score was 8.6 ± 2.3. These results did not differ substantially from those of the TPBS-ND group. <b>Conclusions:</b> A significant number of patients in this study who had TPBS +ve were misdiagnosed in this study. Outcomes after treatment of CRPS were consistently good despite the results of the TPBS. Patients with TPBS +ve had a significant delay to diagnosis. We conclude that TPBS is not useful in the management of CRPS. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triphasic Bone Scintigraphy Is Not Useful in Diagnosis and May Delay Surgical Treatment of CRPS of the Hand.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Del Piñal, Jin Xi Lim, Daniel C Williams, Jaime S Rúas, Alexis T Studer\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424835525500109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Triphasic bone scintigraphy (TPBS) is often used to diagnose complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The primary aim of this study is to determine if the diagnosis of CRPS in patients with a positive TPBS (TPBS +ve) is accurate. A secondary aim is to determine if there was delay in treatment of patients who underwent TPBS compared to those who did not have a TPBS. <b>Methods:</b> Of 225 consecutive patients presenting to the first author's practice with a diagnosis of CRPS, 65 had TPBS performed before referral with 62 having TPBS +ve. The remaining 160 were clinically diagnosed and a TPBS was not done (TPBS-ND). Patients were classified into five categories - wrong diagnosis, dystonic-psychogenic hand, causalgia, flare reaction and irritative carpal tunnel syndrome (ICTS). Patients with flare reaction and ICTS were considered as having true CRPS and the rest were considered as misdiagnosis. The patients' demographics, duration of symptoms, pre- and postoperative pain, functional score and patient satisfaction were compared. <b>Results:</b> Of the 62 TPBS +ve, there were 38 (61%) misdiagnosis. The proportion of misdiagnoses was fewer in the TPBS-ND group (45%; <i>p</i> = 0.036). Thirty-two of the 62 TPBS group (52%) and 92/160 (56%) of the TPBS-ND group had surgical treatment. At a mean follow-up of 19 months, pain dropped 6.5 ± 2.5 points in the TPBS +ve group. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score fell by 56 ± 27. The mean single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score was 8.6 ± 2.3. These results did not differ substantially from those of the TPBS-ND group. <b>Conclusions:</b> A significant number of patients in this study who had TPBS +ve were misdiagnosed in this study. Outcomes after treatment of CRPS were consistently good despite the results of the TPBS. Patients with TPBS +ve had a significant delay to diagnosis. We conclude that TPBS is not useful in the management of CRPS. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:三相骨闪烁扫描(TPBS)通常用于诊断复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)。本研究的主要目的是确定 TPBS 阳性(TPBS +ve)患者的 CRPS 诊断是否准确。次要目的是确定与未接受 TPBS 检查的患者相比,接受 TPBS 检查的患者是否会延误治疗。方法:在第一作者诊所就诊的 225 名诊断为 CRPS 的连续患者中,有 65 人在转诊前接受了 TPBS 检查,其中 62 人的 TPBS 为 +ve。其余 160 人经临床诊断后未进行 TPBS(TPBS-ND)。患者被分为五类--错误诊断、肌强直-心理性手部、因果痛、发作反应和刺激性腕管综合征(ICTS)。耀斑反应和刺激性腕管综合征患者被视为真正的 CRPS 患者,其余患者被视为误诊。比较了患者的人口统计学特征、症状持续时间、术前和术后疼痛、功能评分和患者满意度。结果:在 62 名 TPBS +ve 患者中,有 38 人(61%)被误诊。TPBS-ND 组的误诊比例较低(45%;P = 0.036)。62 名 TPBS 组患者中有 32 人(52%)和 92/160 名 TPBS-ND 组患者(56%)接受了手术治疗。在平均 19 个月的随访中,TPBS +ve 组的疼痛程度下降了 6.5 ± 2.5 分。手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)评分下降了 56 ± 27 分。平均单次数字评估(SANE)得分为(8.6 ± 2.3)分。这些结果与 TPBS-ND 组的结果没有实质性差异。结论本研究中有大量 TPBS +ve 患者被误诊。尽管 TPBS 的结果不同,但 CRPS 治疗后的疗效始终良好。TPBS +ve 患者的诊断时间明显延迟。我们的结论是,TPBS 对 CRPS 的治疗并无益处。证据等级:三级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Triphasic Bone Scintigraphy Is Not Useful in Diagnosis and May Delay Surgical Treatment of CRPS of the Hand.

Background: Triphasic bone scintigraphy (TPBS) is often used to diagnose complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The primary aim of this study is to determine if the diagnosis of CRPS in patients with a positive TPBS (TPBS +ve) is accurate. A secondary aim is to determine if there was delay in treatment of patients who underwent TPBS compared to those who did not have a TPBS. Methods: Of 225 consecutive patients presenting to the first author's practice with a diagnosis of CRPS, 65 had TPBS performed before referral with 62 having TPBS +ve. The remaining 160 were clinically diagnosed and a TPBS was not done (TPBS-ND). Patients were classified into five categories - wrong diagnosis, dystonic-psychogenic hand, causalgia, flare reaction and irritative carpal tunnel syndrome (ICTS). Patients with flare reaction and ICTS were considered as having true CRPS and the rest were considered as misdiagnosis. The patients' demographics, duration of symptoms, pre- and postoperative pain, functional score and patient satisfaction were compared. Results: Of the 62 TPBS +ve, there were 38 (61%) misdiagnosis. The proportion of misdiagnoses was fewer in the TPBS-ND group (45%; p = 0.036). Thirty-two of the 62 TPBS group (52%) and 92/160 (56%) of the TPBS-ND group had surgical treatment. At a mean follow-up of 19 months, pain dropped 6.5 ± 2.5 points in the TPBS +ve group. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score fell by 56 ± 27. The mean single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score was 8.6 ± 2.3. These results did not differ substantially from those of the TPBS-ND group. Conclusions: A significant number of patients in this study who had TPBS +ve were misdiagnosed in this study. Outcomes after treatment of CRPS were consistently good despite the results of the TPBS. Patients with TPBS +ve had a significant delay to diagnosis. We conclude that TPBS is not useful in the management of CRPS. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信