E C Morrissey, L O'Grady, P J Murphy, M Byrne, M Casey, H Doheny, E Dolan, S Duane, H Durand, P Gillespie, P Hayes, A Hobbins, L Hynes, J W McEvoy, J Newell, D Bernieh, H Gill, P Gupta, A W Murphy, G J Molloy
{"title":"支持全科医生和高血压患者最大限度地使用药物控制血压:MIAMI 干预试点群组 RCT。","authors":"E C Morrissey, L O'Grady, P J Murphy, M Byrne, M Casey, H Doheny, E Dolan, S Duane, H Durand, P Gillespie, P Hayes, A Hobbins, L Hynes, J W McEvoy, J Newell, D Bernieh, H Gill, P Gupta, A W Murphy, G J Molloy","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02635-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a key modifiable risk factor for heart disease and stroke. International guidelines have highlighted 'poor adherence to treatment' and 'physician inertia' as major barriers to effective blood pressure management. The Maximising Adherence, Minimising Inertia (MIAMI) intervention, a theory-based complex intervention, supports General Practitioners (GPs) and people with hypertension in maximising medication use to manage blood pressure. This pilot cluster randomised control trial (RCT) aimed to collect and analyse feasibility data to refine the MIAMI intervention and assess the feasibility of a definitive RCT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A pilot cluster RCT with a MIAMI intervention arm and usual care control arm was conducted. Quantitative data collection consisting of clinical measures and a self-report questionnaire took place at baseline and twelve week follow up. Semi-structured interviews with GP and patient participants were conducted. Fidelity (as measured by a protocol checklist and through qualitative interviews) and health economics costings were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six GP practices (intervention arm n = 3, control arm n = 3) and 52 patients (intervention arm n = 25, control arm n = 27) took part. All six GP practices and 92% of patients were retained. Fidelity, as measured by a checklist and through qualitative interviews, was good but three deviations from protocol were identified. Outcomes and measures used were acceptable. The implementation cost of the MIAMI intervention was estimated at €490 per participant. The qualitative data demonstrated that the intervention was considered acceptable and feasible by both GP and patient participants, except for the urine test component, which GPs found difficult to incorporate into practice due to logistical challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MIAMI intervention was considered largely acceptable and feasible. Some changes to both intervention components and trial processes are required but with these in place a definitive RCT could be considered worthwhile.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN85009436, registered 17/1/23.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting GPs and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: a pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention.\",\"authors\":\"E C Morrissey, L O'Grady, P J Murphy, M Byrne, M Casey, H Doheny, E Dolan, S Duane, H Durand, P Gillespie, P Hayes, A Hobbins, L Hynes, J W McEvoy, J Newell, D Bernieh, H Gill, P Gupta, A W Murphy, G J Molloy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-024-02635-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a key modifiable risk factor for heart disease and stroke. International guidelines have highlighted 'poor adherence to treatment' and 'physician inertia' as major barriers to effective blood pressure management. The Maximising Adherence, Minimising Inertia (MIAMI) intervention, a theory-based complex intervention, supports General Practitioners (GPs) and people with hypertension in maximising medication use to manage blood pressure. This pilot cluster randomised control trial (RCT) aimed to collect and analyse feasibility data to refine the MIAMI intervention and assess the feasibility of a definitive RCT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A pilot cluster RCT with a MIAMI intervention arm and usual care control arm was conducted. Quantitative data collection consisting of clinical measures and a self-report questionnaire took place at baseline and twelve week follow up. Semi-structured interviews with GP and patient participants were conducted. Fidelity (as measured by a protocol checklist and through qualitative interviews) and health economics costings were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six GP practices (intervention arm n = 3, control arm n = 3) and 52 patients (intervention arm n = 25, control arm n = 27) took part. All six GP practices and 92% of patients were retained. Fidelity, as measured by a checklist and through qualitative interviews, was good but three deviations from protocol were identified. Outcomes and measures used were acceptable. The implementation cost of the MIAMI intervention was estimated at €490 per participant. The qualitative data demonstrated that the intervention was considered acceptable and feasible by both GP and patient participants, except for the urine test component, which GPs found difficult to incorporate into practice due to logistical challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MIAMI intervention was considered largely acceptable and feasible. Some changes to both intervention components and trial processes are required but with these in place a definitive RCT could be considered worthwhile.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN85009436, registered 17/1/23.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02635-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02635-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:高血压是导致心脏病和中风的主要可改变风险因素。国际指南强调,"治疗依从性差 "和 "医生惰性 "是有效控制血压的主要障碍。最大化依从性,最小化惰性(MIAMI)干预是一项以理论为基础的综合干预措施,它支持全科医生(GPs)和高血压患者最大化使用药物来控制血压。这项试验性分组随机对照试验(RCT)旨在收集和分析可行性数据,以完善MIAMI干预措施,并评估最终RCT的可行性:方法:进行了一项试验性分组随机对照试验,其中包括 MIAMI 干预组和常规护理对照组。定量数据收集包括基线和 12 周随访时的临床测量和自我报告问卷。对全科医生和患者参与者进行了半结构化访谈。对忠实性(通过方案检查表和定性访谈来衡量)和卫生经济学成本进行了评估:六家全科医生诊所(干预组 n = 3,对照组 n = 3)和 52 名患者(干预组 n = 25,对照组 n = 27)参与其中。所有六家全科医生诊所和 92% 的患者都被保留了下来。通过核对表和定性访谈衡量的忠实度良好,但发现有三处偏离协议的情况。使用的结果和测量方法均可接受。据估计,MIAMI 干预措施的实施成本为每位参与者 490 欧元。定性数据显示,全科医生和患者均认为该干预措施是可接受和可行的,但尿检部分除外,全科医生认为由于后勤方面的挑战,很难将其纳入实践:结论:MIAMI 干预措施在很大程度上是可接受和可行的。试验注册:ISRCTN注册号:ISRCTN85009436,注册日期:17/1/23。
Supporting GPs and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: a pilot cluster RCT of the MIAMI intervention.
Background: Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a key modifiable risk factor for heart disease and stroke. International guidelines have highlighted 'poor adherence to treatment' and 'physician inertia' as major barriers to effective blood pressure management. The Maximising Adherence, Minimising Inertia (MIAMI) intervention, a theory-based complex intervention, supports General Practitioners (GPs) and people with hypertension in maximising medication use to manage blood pressure. This pilot cluster randomised control trial (RCT) aimed to collect and analyse feasibility data to refine the MIAMI intervention and assess the feasibility of a definitive RCT.
Method: A pilot cluster RCT with a MIAMI intervention arm and usual care control arm was conducted. Quantitative data collection consisting of clinical measures and a self-report questionnaire took place at baseline and twelve week follow up. Semi-structured interviews with GP and patient participants were conducted. Fidelity (as measured by a protocol checklist and through qualitative interviews) and health economics costings were assessed.
Results: Six GP practices (intervention arm n = 3, control arm n = 3) and 52 patients (intervention arm n = 25, control arm n = 27) took part. All six GP practices and 92% of patients were retained. Fidelity, as measured by a checklist and through qualitative interviews, was good but three deviations from protocol were identified. Outcomes and measures used were acceptable. The implementation cost of the MIAMI intervention was estimated at €490 per participant. The qualitative data demonstrated that the intervention was considered acceptable and feasible by both GP and patient participants, except for the urine test component, which GPs found difficult to incorporate into practice due to logistical challenges.
Conclusions: The MIAMI intervention was considered largely acceptable and feasible. Some changes to both intervention components and trial processes are required but with these in place a definitive RCT could be considered worthwhile.