葡萄牙语版帕金森病患者综合运动协调量表的可靠性、并发有效性、响应性和测量误差。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Clara Rezende Rocha, Caroline Rodrigues Osawa, Maria Eduarda Salum Aveiro Henrique, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto
{"title":"葡萄牙语版帕金森病患者综合运动协调量表的可靠性、并发有效性、响应性和测量误差。","authors":"Clara Rezende Rocha, Caroline Rodrigues Osawa, Maria Eduarda Salum Aveiro Henrique, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto","doi":"10.1002/pri.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of motor coordination in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is based on motor performance and does not consider movement quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Comprehensive Coordination Scale (CCS) in patients with PD and correlate it with motor impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional and case-control study included 15 individuals with PD and 15 healthy older individuals as controls. Motor impairments were measured using the MDS-UPDRS (Part III). Motor coordination (CCS) was evaluated by five examiners and classified into four domains: upper and lower limbs and unilateral and bilateral tasks. CCS scores were compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney test; concurrent validity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation between CCS and PD scales; and the inter-rate reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant difference between the groups in the upper limb (p < 0.001), lower limb (p = 0.006), unilateral (p < 0.001), bilateral (p = 0.015), and total (p < 0.001) CCS scores. Total CCS score (ICC 0.78), upper limb (ICC 0.71), lower limb (ICC 0.86) and unilateral (ICC 0.74) showed high inter-rate reliability. Bilateral domain (ICC 0.92) showed very high inter-rate reliability. And, there was negative correlation between CCS upper limb and postural tremor of hands (r = -0.716; p = 0.008), unilateral CCS domain with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.687; p = 0.012), and CCS total score with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.804; p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was high inter-rater agreement for all CCS items, mainly in the lower limb and bilateral tasks. And, there was a moderate-to-very strong correlation between the total and sub-items of the CCS and motor impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 1","pages":"e70007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Clara Rezende Rocha, Caroline Rodrigues Osawa, Maria Eduarda Salum Aveiro Henrique, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of motor coordination in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is based on motor performance and does not consider movement quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Comprehensive Coordination Scale (CCS) in patients with PD and correlate it with motor impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional and case-control study included 15 individuals with PD and 15 healthy older individuals as controls. Motor impairments were measured using the MDS-UPDRS (Part III). Motor coordination (CCS) was evaluated by five examiners and classified into four domains: upper and lower limbs and unilateral and bilateral tasks. CCS scores were compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney test; concurrent validity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation between CCS and PD scales; and the inter-rate reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant difference between the groups in the upper limb (p < 0.001), lower limb (p = 0.006), unilateral (p < 0.001), bilateral (p = 0.015), and total (p < 0.001) CCS scores. Total CCS score (ICC 0.78), upper limb (ICC 0.71), lower limb (ICC 0.86) and unilateral (ICC 0.74) showed high inter-rate reliability. Bilateral domain (ICC 0.92) showed very high inter-rate reliability. And, there was negative correlation between CCS upper limb and postural tremor of hands (r = -0.716; p = 0.008), unilateral CCS domain with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.687; p = 0.012), and CCS total score with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.804; p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was high inter-rater agreement for all CCS items, mainly in the lower limb and bilateral tasks. And, there was a moderate-to-very strong correlation between the total and sub-items of the CCS and motor impairment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"e70007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:帕金森病(PD)患者的运动协调性评估以运动表现为基础,不考虑运动质量:帕金森病(PD)患者的运动协调性评估以运动表现为基础,并不考虑运动质量:在帕金森病患者中验证综合协调量表(CCS),并将其与运动障碍相关联:这项横断面病例对照研究包括 15 名帕金森病患者和 15 名健康老年人作为对照。使用 MDS-UPDRS(第三部分)测量运动障碍。运动协调能力(CCS)由五名检查人员进行评估,并分为四个领域:上肢和下肢、单侧和双侧任务。采用 Mann-Whitney 检验比较各组间的 CCS 分数;采用 CCS 与 PD 量表之间的 Spearman 相关性评估并发有效性;采用类内相关系数 (ICC) 计算组间可靠性:结果:在上肢方面,两组间存在明显差异(p 结论:在下肢方面,两组间存在明显差异(p 结论):CCS所有项目的评分者之间的一致性都很高,主要体现在下肢和双侧任务上。而且,CCS 的总项目和分项目与运动障碍之间存在中度到高度相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.

Introduction: Assessment of motor coordination in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is based on motor performance and does not consider movement quality.

Objective: To validate the Comprehensive Coordination Scale (CCS) in patients with PD and correlate it with motor impairment.

Methods: This cross-sectional and case-control study included 15 individuals with PD and 15 healthy older individuals as controls. Motor impairments were measured using the MDS-UPDRS (Part III). Motor coordination (CCS) was evaluated by five examiners and classified into four domains: upper and lower limbs and unilateral and bilateral tasks. CCS scores were compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney test; concurrent validity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation between CCS and PD scales; and the inter-rate reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: There was significant difference between the groups in the upper limb (p < 0.001), lower limb (p = 0.006), unilateral (p < 0.001), bilateral (p = 0.015), and total (p < 0.001) CCS scores. Total CCS score (ICC 0.78), upper limb (ICC 0.71), lower limb (ICC 0.86) and unilateral (ICC 0.74) showed high inter-rate reliability. Bilateral domain (ICC 0.92) showed very high inter-rate reliability. And, there was negative correlation between CCS upper limb and postural tremor of hands (r = -0.716; p = 0.008), unilateral CCS domain with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.687; p = 0.012), and CCS total score with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.804; p = 0.002).

Conclusion: There was high inter-rater agreement for all CCS items, mainly in the lower limb and bilateral tasks. And, there was a moderate-to-very strong correlation between the total and sub-items of the CCS and motor impairment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信