Clara Rezende Rocha, Caroline Rodrigues Osawa, Maria Eduarda Salum Aveiro Henrique, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto
{"title":"葡萄牙语版帕金森病患者综合运动协调量表的可靠性、并发有效性、响应性和测量误差。","authors":"Clara Rezende Rocha, Caroline Rodrigues Osawa, Maria Eduarda Salum Aveiro Henrique, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto","doi":"10.1002/pri.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of motor coordination in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is based on motor performance and does not consider movement quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Comprehensive Coordination Scale (CCS) in patients with PD and correlate it with motor impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional and case-control study included 15 individuals with PD and 15 healthy older individuals as controls. Motor impairments were measured using the MDS-UPDRS (Part III). Motor coordination (CCS) was evaluated by five examiners and classified into four domains: upper and lower limbs and unilateral and bilateral tasks. CCS scores were compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney test; concurrent validity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation between CCS and PD scales; and the inter-rate reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant difference between the groups in the upper limb (p < 0.001), lower limb (p = 0.006), unilateral (p < 0.001), bilateral (p = 0.015), and total (p < 0.001) CCS scores. Total CCS score (ICC 0.78), upper limb (ICC 0.71), lower limb (ICC 0.86) and unilateral (ICC 0.74) showed high inter-rate reliability. Bilateral domain (ICC 0.92) showed very high inter-rate reliability. And, there was negative correlation between CCS upper limb and postural tremor of hands (r = -0.716; p = 0.008), unilateral CCS domain with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.687; p = 0.012), and CCS total score with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.804; p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was high inter-rater agreement for all CCS items, mainly in the lower limb and bilateral tasks. And, there was a moderate-to-very strong correlation between the total and sub-items of the CCS and motor impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 1","pages":"e70007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Clara Rezende Rocha, Caroline Rodrigues Osawa, Maria Eduarda Salum Aveiro Henrique, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of motor coordination in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is based on motor performance and does not consider movement quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Comprehensive Coordination Scale (CCS) in patients with PD and correlate it with motor impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional and case-control study included 15 individuals with PD and 15 healthy older individuals as controls. Motor impairments were measured using the MDS-UPDRS (Part III). Motor coordination (CCS) was evaluated by five examiners and classified into four domains: upper and lower limbs and unilateral and bilateral tasks. CCS scores were compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney test; concurrent validity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation between CCS and PD scales; and the inter-rate reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant difference between the groups in the upper limb (p < 0.001), lower limb (p = 0.006), unilateral (p < 0.001), bilateral (p = 0.015), and total (p < 0.001) CCS scores. Total CCS score (ICC 0.78), upper limb (ICC 0.71), lower limb (ICC 0.86) and unilateral (ICC 0.74) showed high inter-rate reliability. Bilateral domain (ICC 0.92) showed very high inter-rate reliability. And, there was negative correlation between CCS upper limb and postural tremor of hands (r = -0.716; p = 0.008), unilateral CCS domain with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.687; p = 0.012), and CCS total score with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.804; p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was high inter-rater agreement for all CCS items, mainly in the lower limb and bilateral tasks. And, there was a moderate-to-very strong correlation between the total and sub-items of the CCS and motor impairment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"e70007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.
Introduction: Assessment of motor coordination in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is based on motor performance and does not consider movement quality.
Objective: To validate the Comprehensive Coordination Scale (CCS) in patients with PD and correlate it with motor impairment.
Methods: This cross-sectional and case-control study included 15 individuals with PD and 15 healthy older individuals as controls. Motor impairments were measured using the MDS-UPDRS (Part III). Motor coordination (CCS) was evaluated by five examiners and classified into four domains: upper and lower limbs and unilateral and bilateral tasks. CCS scores were compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney test; concurrent validity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation between CCS and PD scales; and the inter-rate reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: There was significant difference between the groups in the upper limb (p < 0.001), lower limb (p = 0.006), unilateral (p < 0.001), bilateral (p = 0.015), and total (p < 0.001) CCS scores. Total CCS score (ICC 0.78), upper limb (ICC 0.71), lower limb (ICC 0.86) and unilateral (ICC 0.74) showed high inter-rate reliability. Bilateral domain (ICC 0.92) showed very high inter-rate reliability. And, there was negative correlation between CCS upper limb and postural tremor of hands (r = -0.716; p = 0.008), unilateral CCS domain with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.687; p = 0.012), and CCS total score with postural tremor of hands (r = -0.804; p = 0.002).
Conclusion: There was high inter-rater agreement for all CCS items, mainly in the lower limb and bilateral tasks. And, there was a moderate-to-very strong correlation between the total and sub-items of the CCS and motor impairment.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.