让社区药剂师了解慢性阻塞性肺病病例调查方法:范围综述。

IF 1.6 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Omowumi Idowu, Meghan Sebastianski, Janice Y Kung, Nese Yuksel, Theresa J Schindel, Ross T Tsuyuki, Randy So, Tatiana Makhinova
{"title":"让社区药剂师了解慢性阻塞性肺病病例调查方法:范围综述。","authors":"Omowumi Idowu, Meghan Sebastianski, Janice Y Kung, Nese Yuksel, Theresa J Schindel, Ross T Tsuyuki, Randy So, Tatiana Makhinova","doi":"10.1177/17151635241284802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a strategy to address the increasing human and economic costs of this condition. This study aimed to inform pharmacists' case-finding strategies by providing an overview of case-finding approaches by health care practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA ScR) guidelines. Included studies were analyzed under the following themes: population characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, setting, case-finding strategies and yield, health care practitioners involved, interprofessional collaboration and the provision of preventive services. Studies were then characterized by highest yields (the weighted average of each approach expressed as a percentage of the total number of new COPD cases divided by the total number of patients screened using the same approach).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screening process produced 170 eligible studies. Twenty case-finding approaches with average yields of new COPD cases ranging from 3.8% to 29% were identified. The approach with the highest yield involved the use of a questionnaire, peak flow meter and pre-post spirometry. In 14 of these approaches, the process was initiated with the use of questionnaires. In many of the studies, case-finding was targeted at high-risk and/or symptomatic patients. Characteristics of studies with the highest case-finding yields included provider education/training, patient education, active screening, multistep approaches to case-finding, provider engagement, diagnostic criteria by guidelines and engagement of other health care practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our scoping review of case-finding methods for patients with COPD, we found the greatest yield from pre-post spirometry following initial screening with a peak flow meter and questionnaire. Pharmacists and health researchers can use these approaches to identify high-risk patients for interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46612,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal","volume":" ","pages":"17151635241284802"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing community pharmacists on COPD case-finding methods: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Omowumi Idowu, Meghan Sebastianski, Janice Y Kung, Nese Yuksel, Theresa J Schindel, Ross T Tsuyuki, Randy So, Tatiana Makhinova\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17151635241284802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a strategy to address the increasing human and economic costs of this condition. This study aimed to inform pharmacists' case-finding strategies by providing an overview of case-finding approaches by health care practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA ScR) guidelines. Included studies were analyzed under the following themes: population characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, setting, case-finding strategies and yield, health care practitioners involved, interprofessional collaboration and the provision of preventive services. Studies were then characterized by highest yields (the weighted average of each approach expressed as a percentage of the total number of new COPD cases divided by the total number of patients screened using the same approach).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screening process produced 170 eligible studies. Twenty case-finding approaches with average yields of new COPD cases ranging from 3.8% to 29% were identified. The approach with the highest yield involved the use of a questionnaire, peak flow meter and pre-post spirometry. In 14 of these approaches, the process was initiated with the use of questionnaires. In many of the studies, case-finding was targeted at high-risk and/or symptomatic patients. Characteristics of studies with the highest case-finding yields included provider education/training, patient education, active screening, multistep approaches to case-finding, provider engagement, diagnostic criteria by guidelines and engagement of other health care practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our scoping review of case-finding methods for patients with COPD, we found the greatest yield from pre-post spirometry following initial screening with a peak flow meter and questionnaire. Pharmacists and health researchers can use these approaches to identify high-risk patients for interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Pharmacists Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17151635241284802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556641/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Pharmacists Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17151635241284802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17151635241284802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的人力和经济成本不断增加,早期发现慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)是解决这一问题的一项策略。本研究旨在通过概述医疗从业人员的病例查找方法,为药剂师的病例查找策略提供参考:方法:根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)和范围界定综述的 PRISMA 扩展(PRISMA ScR)指南进行了范围界定综述。对纳入的研究按照以下主题进行了分析:人群特征、纳入和排除标准、环境、病例调查策略和结果、参与的医疗从业人员、跨专业合作以及预防服务的提供。然后根据最高收益率(每种方法的加权平均值,以新增慢性阻塞性肺病病例总数除以使用相同方法筛查的患者总数的百分比表示)对研究进行定性:结果:筛选过程产生了 170 项符合条件的研究。共确定了 20 种病例调查方法,其新增慢性阻塞性肺病病例的平均收益率从 3.8% 到 29% 不等。收益率最高的方法包括问卷调查、峰值流量计和事后肺活量测定。在这些方法中,有 14 种是通过使用调查问卷来启动这一过程的。在许多研究中,病例调查的对象是高风险和/或有症状的患者。病例发现率最高的研究特点包括提供者教育/培训、患者教育、主动筛查、多步骤病例发现方法、提供者参与、指南中的诊断标准以及其他医疗从业人员的参与:在我们对慢性阻塞性肺病患者病例查找方法进行的范围审查中,我们发现在使用峰值流量计和问卷进行初步筛查后,事后肺活量测定法的收益最大。药剂师和健康研究人员可以利用这些方法来识别高危患者,以便采取干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informing community pharmacists on COPD case-finding methods: A scoping review.

Background: Early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a strategy to address the increasing human and economic costs of this condition. This study aimed to inform pharmacists' case-finding strategies by providing an overview of case-finding approaches by health care practitioners.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA ScR) guidelines. Included studies were analyzed under the following themes: population characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, setting, case-finding strategies and yield, health care practitioners involved, interprofessional collaboration and the provision of preventive services. Studies were then characterized by highest yields (the weighted average of each approach expressed as a percentage of the total number of new COPD cases divided by the total number of patients screened using the same approach).

Results: The screening process produced 170 eligible studies. Twenty case-finding approaches with average yields of new COPD cases ranging from 3.8% to 29% were identified. The approach with the highest yield involved the use of a questionnaire, peak flow meter and pre-post spirometry. In 14 of these approaches, the process was initiated with the use of questionnaires. In many of the studies, case-finding was targeted at high-risk and/or symptomatic patients. Characteristics of studies with the highest case-finding yields included provider education/training, patient education, active screening, multistep approaches to case-finding, provider engagement, diagnostic criteria by guidelines and engagement of other health care practitioners.

Conclusion: In our scoping review of case-finding methods for patients with COPD, we found the greatest yield from pre-post spirometry following initial screening with a peak flow meter and questionnaire. Pharmacists and health researchers can use these approaches to identify high-risk patients for interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Pharmacists Journal
Canadian Pharmacists Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
26.70%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Established in 1868, the Canadian Pharmacists Journal is the oldest continuously published periodical in Canada. Our mission is to enhance patient care through advancement of pharmacy practice, with continuing professional development, peer-reviewed research, and advocacy. Our vision is to become the foremost journal for pharmacy practice and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信