[临终关怀规划:巴伐利亚成年残疾人之家的准备情况如何?]

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Malte Klemmt, Franziska Zehl, Silke Neuderth, Tanja Henking
{"title":"[临终关怀规划:巴伐利亚成年残疾人之家的准备情况如何?]","authors":"Malte Klemmt, Franziska Zehl, Silke Neuderth, Tanja Henking","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Autonomy at the end of life is associated with the ability to make self-determined decisions. The heterogeneous field of inpatient integration assistance poses particular challenges in this context. Advance care planning (ACP) is now available to people with disabilities. Nevertheless, little is known about the institution-related needs and the current status with regard to ACP in integration assistance homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of all 850 inpatient homes providing integration assistance for adults in Bavaria was carried out. The survey was conducted online and addressed to home managers. In total, data of 96 homes (11.3% of all homes) was included in the descriptive and categorizing text analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents die in 60% of the homes surveyed. 73.7% of the homes offer ACP for their residents, with 62.9% of these homes using standardized procedures. One of the reasons given by the participants for not offering ACP is a better qualification of employees. Barriers include the residents' lack of ability to participate in ACP meetings or relatives' reluctant attitude towards ACP.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>End-of-life care is a relevant topic for inpatient homes providing integration assistance. Accordingly, ACP is already being addressed by a large proportion of homes. Here, special needs of residents due to existing impairments can pose challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study enables us to draw conclusions about the optimization of ACP from the perspective of care homes, which relate to structural (e.g., adaptation of existing concepts), personal (e.g., qualification) and emotional (e.g., de-tabooization) aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Advance care planning for the end of life: How prepared are homes for adults with disabilities in Bavaria?]\",\"authors\":\"Malte Klemmt, Franziska Zehl, Silke Neuderth, Tanja Henking\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Autonomy at the end of life is associated with the ability to make self-determined decisions. The heterogeneous field of inpatient integration assistance poses particular challenges in this context. Advance care planning (ACP) is now available to people with disabilities. Nevertheless, little is known about the institution-related needs and the current status with regard to ACP in integration assistance homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of all 850 inpatient homes providing integration assistance for adults in Bavaria was carried out. The survey was conducted online and addressed to home managers. In total, data of 96 homes (11.3% of all homes) was included in the descriptive and categorizing text analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents die in 60% of the homes surveyed. 73.7% of the homes offer ACP for their residents, with 62.9% of these homes using standardized procedures. One of the reasons given by the participants for not offering ACP is a better qualification of employees. Barriers include the residents' lack of ability to participate in ACP meetings or relatives' reluctant attitude towards ACP.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>End-of-life care is a relevant topic for inpatient homes providing integration assistance. Accordingly, ACP is already being addressed by a large proportion of homes. Here, special needs of residents due to existing impairments can pose challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study enables us to draw conclusions about the optimization of ACP from the perspective of care homes, which relate to structural (e.g., adaptation of existing concepts), personal (e.g., qualification) and emotional (e.g., de-tabooization) aspects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"63-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2024.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2024.09.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:生命末期的自主权与做出自我决定的能力有关。在这一背景下,住院病人融合援助领域的多样性带来了特殊的挑战。现在,残疾人也可以进行预先护理规划(ACP)。然而,人们对与机构相关的需求以及融合辅助院的预先护理规划现状却知之甚少:方法:对巴伐利亚州所有 850 家为成年人提供融合援助的住院机构进行了调查。调查是通过网络进行的,调查对象为养老院管理人员。共有 96 家养老院(占养老院总数的 11.3%)的数据被纳入描述性和分类文本分析:接受调查的安老院中有 60% 的院友死亡。73.7%的养老院为住院患者提供 ACP,其中 62.9%的养老院采用标准化程序。参与者提出的不提供 ACP 的原因之一是员工的资质要求更高。障碍包括住客没有能力参加 ACP 会议或亲属对 ACP 持勉强态度:临终关怀是提供整合援助的住院院舍的一个相关主题。因此,很大一部分安老院已经开始关注 ACP。在这方面,住户因现有缺陷而产生的特殊需求可能会带来挑战:这项研究使我们能够从疗养院的角度得出优化 ACP 的结论,这些结论涉及结构(如现有概念的调整)、个人(如资格)和情感(如去禁忌化)等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Advance care planning for the end of life: How prepared are homes for adults with disabilities in Bavaria?]

Introduction: Autonomy at the end of life is associated with the ability to make self-determined decisions. The heterogeneous field of inpatient integration assistance poses particular challenges in this context. Advance care planning (ACP) is now available to people with disabilities. Nevertheless, little is known about the institution-related needs and the current status with regard to ACP in integration assistance homes.

Methods: A survey of all 850 inpatient homes providing integration assistance for adults in Bavaria was carried out. The survey was conducted online and addressed to home managers. In total, data of 96 homes (11.3% of all homes) was included in the descriptive and categorizing text analysis.

Results: Residents die in 60% of the homes surveyed. 73.7% of the homes offer ACP for their residents, with 62.9% of these homes using standardized procedures. One of the reasons given by the participants for not offering ACP is a better qualification of employees. Barriers include the residents' lack of ability to participate in ACP meetings or relatives' reluctant attitude towards ACP.

Discussion: End-of-life care is a relevant topic for inpatient homes providing integration assistance. Accordingly, ACP is already being addressed by a large proportion of homes. Here, special needs of residents due to existing impairments can pose challenges.

Conclusion: The study enables us to draw conclusions about the optimization of ACP from the perspective of care homes, which relate to structural (e.g., adaptation of existing concepts), personal (e.g., qualification) and emotional (e.g., de-tabooization) aspects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信