研究报告:在普通重症监护人群中使用咽部电刺激治疗吞咽困难--一项服务开发。

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/17511437241270244
Thomas Williams, Elizabeth Walkden, Karishma Patel, Naomi E Cochrane, Brendan A McGrath, Sarah Wallace
{"title":"研究报告:在普通重症监护人群中使用咽部电刺激治疗吞咽困难--一项服务开发。","authors":"Thomas Williams, Elizabeth Walkden, Karishma Patel, Naomi E Cochrane, Brendan A McGrath, Sarah Wallace","doi":"10.1177/17511437241270244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia places a substantial burden on the critically ill, affecting 12%-84% of this cohort, and is independently associated with worse outcomes. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES-treatment) is a novel dysphagia therapy with an emerging evidence base. This retrospective observational study describes our dysphagia service and reports the use of PES-treatment as a standard of care in recovering critically ill patients at a single-site tertiary UK hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to Acute or Cardio-Thoracic adult intensive care units between 1st July 2017 and 30th June 2022 were routinely referred to Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) following tracheostomy, or suspected dysphonia/dysphagia. Clinical assessments and direct laryngeal visualisation using Fibreoptic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) were performed. Severe dysphagia was defined as Penetration-Aspiration Score of ⩾6 and patients were offered PES-treatment when staffing allowed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 289 patients with severe dysphagia, 19 underwent a course of PES-treatment with the remaining patients receiving standard care. PES-treatment patients were significantly less likely to remain nil-by-mouth (11.1% vs 62.5%, Chi<sup>2</sup> <i>p</i> < 0.001) or to have an enteral feeding tube in situ at discharge from critical care (27.8% vs 62.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.006) than those receiving standard dysphagia care. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in Penetration-Aspiration Score at repeat FEES: PES-treatment mean difference -2.0 (<i>p</i> = 0.003); non-PES-treatment -1.68 (<i>p</i> < 0.001); (61% PES-treatment improved vs 40% non-PES-treatment, <i>p</i> = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our observations suggest that PES may be effective in the general critical care population. PES may offer new treatment options for patients and healthcare staff managing severe dysphagia and its significant consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"25 4","pages":"374-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research report: Management of dysphagia using pharyngeal electrical stimulation in the general intensive care population - A service development.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Williams, Elizabeth Walkden, Karishma Patel, Naomi E Cochrane, Brendan A McGrath, Sarah Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17511437241270244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia places a substantial burden on the critically ill, affecting 12%-84% of this cohort, and is independently associated with worse outcomes. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES-treatment) is a novel dysphagia therapy with an emerging evidence base. This retrospective observational study describes our dysphagia service and reports the use of PES-treatment as a standard of care in recovering critically ill patients at a single-site tertiary UK hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to Acute or Cardio-Thoracic adult intensive care units between 1st July 2017 and 30th June 2022 were routinely referred to Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) following tracheostomy, or suspected dysphonia/dysphagia. Clinical assessments and direct laryngeal visualisation using Fibreoptic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) were performed. Severe dysphagia was defined as Penetration-Aspiration Score of ⩾6 and patients were offered PES-treatment when staffing allowed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 289 patients with severe dysphagia, 19 underwent a course of PES-treatment with the remaining patients receiving standard care. PES-treatment patients were significantly less likely to remain nil-by-mouth (11.1% vs 62.5%, Chi<sup>2</sup> <i>p</i> < 0.001) or to have an enteral feeding tube in situ at discharge from critical care (27.8% vs 62.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.006) than those receiving standard dysphagia care. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in Penetration-Aspiration Score at repeat FEES: PES-treatment mean difference -2.0 (<i>p</i> = 0.003); non-PES-treatment -1.68 (<i>p</i> < 0.001); (61% PES-treatment improved vs 40% non-PES-treatment, <i>p</i> = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our observations suggest that PES may be effective in the general critical care population. PES may offer new treatment options for patients and healthcare staff managing severe dysphagia and its significant consequences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"374-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Intensive Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241270244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241270244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吞咽困难给危重病人带来了沉重负担,12%-84%的危重病人患有吞咽困难,而且吞咽困难还与病情恶化密切相关。咽部电刺激(PES 治疗)是一种新型的吞咽困难治疗方法,其证据基础正在逐渐形成。这项回顾性观察研究介绍了我们的吞咽困难服务,并报告了英国一家三甲医院将咽电刺激治疗作为重症患者康复标准护理的使用情况:2017年7月1日至2022年6月30日期间入住急诊或心胸科成人重症监护病房的患者在接受气管切开术或疑似发音障碍/吞咽困难后被常规转诊至言语和语言治疗中心(SLT)。采用纤维光学吞咽评估(FEES)进行临床评估和直接喉部显像。严重吞咽困难的定义是穿刺-吞咽评分⩾6,在人员允许的情况下,为患者提供 PES 治疗:在 289 名严重吞咽困难患者中,19 人接受了 PES 治疗,其余患者接受了标准护理。与接受标准吞咽困难护理的患者相比,接受 PES 治疗的患者保持无口的几率明显降低(11.1% 对 62.5%,Chi2 p p = 0.006)。两组患者在再次接受 FEES 治疗时的穿刺-吐气评分均有所改善:PES治疗组的平均差异为-2.0(P = 0.003);非PES治疗组为-1.68(P = 0.09):我们的观察结果表明,PES 在普通重症监护人群中可能有效。PES 可为处理严重吞咽困难及其重大后果的患者和医护人员提供新的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research report: Management of dysphagia using pharyngeal electrical stimulation in the general intensive care population - A service development.

Background: Dysphagia places a substantial burden on the critically ill, affecting 12%-84% of this cohort, and is independently associated with worse outcomes. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES-treatment) is a novel dysphagia therapy with an emerging evidence base. This retrospective observational study describes our dysphagia service and reports the use of PES-treatment as a standard of care in recovering critically ill patients at a single-site tertiary UK hospital.

Methods: Patients admitted to Acute or Cardio-Thoracic adult intensive care units between 1st July 2017 and 30th June 2022 were routinely referred to Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) following tracheostomy, or suspected dysphonia/dysphagia. Clinical assessments and direct laryngeal visualisation using Fibreoptic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) were performed. Severe dysphagia was defined as Penetration-Aspiration Score of ⩾6 and patients were offered PES-treatment when staffing allowed.

Results: Of 289 patients with severe dysphagia, 19 underwent a course of PES-treatment with the remaining patients receiving standard care. PES-treatment patients were significantly less likely to remain nil-by-mouth (11.1% vs 62.5%, Chi2 p < 0.001) or to have an enteral feeding tube in situ at discharge from critical care (27.8% vs 62.5%, p = 0.006) than those receiving standard dysphagia care. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in Penetration-Aspiration Score at repeat FEES: PES-treatment mean difference -2.0 (p = 0.003); non-PES-treatment -1.68 (p < 0.001); (61% PES-treatment improved vs 40% non-PES-treatment, p = 0.09).

Conclusion: Our observations suggest that PES may be effective in the general critical care population. PES may offer new treatment options for patients and healthcare staff managing severe dysphagia and its significant consequences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信