韩国发育筛查测试(Korean Developmental Screening Test)修订版一岁儿童分类的不稳定性。

IF 3.2 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.3345/cep.2024.00619
Ji Eun Jeong, You Min Kim, Na Won Lee, Gyeong Nam Kim, Jisuk Bae, Jin Kyung Kim
{"title":"韩国发育筛查测试(Korean Developmental Screening Test)修订版一岁儿童分类的不稳定性。","authors":"Ji Eun Jeong, You Min Kim, Na Won Lee, Gyeong Nam Kim, Jisuk Bae, Jin Kyung Kim","doi":"10.3345/cep.2024.00619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early development is characterized by considerable variability.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine the stability of developmental classifications using the revised Korean Developmental Screening Test (K-DST) in healthy term infants aged 4-6 and 10-12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the Korean Children's Environmental Health Study, a nationwide prospective birth cohort. Sixty-nine healthy term infants (26 boys, 43 girls) underwent serial K-DST assessments at 4-6 and 10-12 months of age, between August 2017 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 4-5 months, over 50% of infants were categorized in the ≥-1 standard deviation (SD) group, with the lowest prevalence in the gross motor domain (52.7%). Seven infants (10.1%) scored below -2 SD in at least one domain, most commonly in gross and fine motor domains (7.3%). At 10-12 months, over 70% of infants scored in the ≥-1 SD group, except in the language domain. Six infants (9.5%) scored below -2 SD in at least one domain, (cognition 4.8%, language 3.2%, gross motor 3.2%). Serial follow-up showed significant improvement, with many infants moving to the ≥-1 SD group, particularly in the gross motor domain (33.3%). Of the seven infants scoring below -2 SD at 4-5 months, only two remained in this category at 10-12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infants scoring below -2 SD on the revised K-DST 4-5 months questionnaire, especially in the gross motor domain, should undergo close monitoring and repeated evaluations in the absence of neurological abnormalities or developmental red flags.</p>","PeriodicalId":36018,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instability of revised Korean Developmental Screening Test classification in first year of life.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Eun Jeong, You Min Kim, Na Won Lee, Gyeong Nam Kim, Jisuk Bae, Jin Kyung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3345/cep.2024.00619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early development is characterized by considerable variability.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine the stability of developmental classifications using the revised Korean Developmental Screening Test (K-DST) in healthy term infants aged 4-6 and 10-12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the Korean Children's Environmental Health Study, a nationwide prospective birth cohort. Sixty-nine healthy term infants (26 boys, 43 girls) underwent serial K-DST assessments at 4-6 and 10-12 months of age, between August 2017 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 4-5 months, over 50% of infants were categorized in the ≥-1 standard deviation (SD) group, with the lowest prevalence in the gross motor domain (52.7%). Seven infants (10.1%) scored below -2 SD in at least one domain, most commonly in gross and fine motor domains (7.3%). At 10-12 months, over 70% of infants scored in the ≥-1 SD group, except in the language domain. Six infants (9.5%) scored below -2 SD in at least one domain, (cognition 4.8%, language 3.2%, gross motor 3.2%). Serial follow-up showed significant improvement, with many infants moving to the ≥-1 SD group, particularly in the gross motor domain (33.3%). Of the seven infants scoring below -2 SD at 4-5 months, only two remained in this category at 10-12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infants scoring below -2 SD on the revised K-DST 4-5 months questionnaire, especially in the gross motor domain, should undergo close monitoring and repeated evaluations in the absence of neurological abnormalities or developmental red flags.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"97-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2024.00619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2024.00619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:研究修订后的韩国发育筛查测试(K-DST)对 4-6 个月和 10-12 个月健康足月儿发育分类的稳定性:本研究使用了韩国儿童环境健康研究的数据,这是一项全国性的前瞻性出生队列研究。2017年8月至2019年12月期间,69名健康足月婴儿(26名男婴,43名女婴)分别在4-6个月和10-12个月时接受了两次序列测试。我们根据修订后的 K-DST 临界点将全组婴儿分为三类:4-5个月时,超过50%的婴儿被归为≥-1标准差(SD)组。粗大运动领域的患病率最低(52.7%)。有 7 名婴儿(10.1%)至少在一个领域的得分低于-2 标准差。在粗大运动和精细运动领域,得分低于-2 SD的比例为 7.3%。在 10-12 个月时,除语言领域外,超过 70% 的婴儿被归为≥-1 SD 组。有 6 名婴儿(9.5%)至少在一个领域的得分低于-2 SD。在认知、语言和大运动领域,得分低于-2SD 的比例分别为 4.8%、3.2% 和 3.2%。在4-12个月的连续随访中,有相当多的婴儿进步到了同龄组和高水平组(≥-1 SD),尤其是在粗大运动领域(33.3%)。7名在4-5个月时得分低于-2 SD的婴儿中,只有2名在10-12个月时得分为-2 SD:结论:对于在修订版 K-DST 4-5 个月调查表中出现疑似发育迟缓的婴儿,尤其是在粗大运动领域,如果没有任何异常的神经系统检查结果或发育方面的信号,则应进行密切监测和重复评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instability of revised Korean Developmental Screening Test classification in first year of life.

Background: Early development is characterized by considerable variability.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the stability of developmental classifications using the revised Korean Developmental Screening Test (K-DST) in healthy term infants aged 4-6 and 10-12 months.

Methods: Data were obtained from the Korean Children's Environmental Health Study, a nationwide prospective birth cohort. Sixty-nine healthy term infants (26 boys, 43 girls) underwent serial K-DST assessments at 4-6 and 10-12 months of age, between August 2017 and December 2019.

Results: At 4-5 months, over 50% of infants were categorized in the ≥-1 standard deviation (SD) group, with the lowest prevalence in the gross motor domain (52.7%). Seven infants (10.1%) scored below -2 SD in at least one domain, most commonly in gross and fine motor domains (7.3%). At 10-12 months, over 70% of infants scored in the ≥-1 SD group, except in the language domain. Six infants (9.5%) scored below -2 SD in at least one domain, (cognition 4.8%, language 3.2%, gross motor 3.2%). Serial follow-up showed significant improvement, with many infants moving to the ≥-1 SD group, particularly in the gross motor domain (33.3%). Of the seven infants scoring below -2 SD at 4-5 months, only two remained in this category at 10-12 months.

Conclusion: Infants scoring below -2 SD on the revised K-DST 4-5 months questionnaire, especially in the gross motor domain, should undergo close monitoring and repeated evaluations in the absence of neurological abnormalities or developmental red flags.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.40%
发文量
88
审稿时长
60 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信