在低收入和中等收入国家,外固定与内固定治疗创伤性下肢骨折的效果。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Manon Pigeolet, Hamaiyal Sana, Morgan R Askew, Shubham Jaswal, Paola F Ortega, Sarah R Bradley, Ayush Shah, Carol Mita, Daniel S Corlew, Ayesha Saeed, Emmanuel Makasa, Kiran J Agarwal-Harding
{"title":"在低收入和中等收入国家,外固定与内固定治疗创伤性下肢骨折的效果。","authors":"Manon Pigeolet, Hamaiyal Sana, Morgan R Askew, Shubham Jaswal, Paola F Ortega, Sarah R Bradley, Ayush Shah, Carol Mita, Daniel S Corlew, Ayesha Saeed, Emmanuel Makasa, Kiran J Agarwal-Harding","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Lower limb fractures are common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and represent a significant burden to the existing orthopaedic surgical infrastructure. In high income country (HIC) settings, internal fixation is the standard of care due to its superior outcomes. In LMICs, external fixation is often the surgical treatment of choice due to limited supplies, cost considerations, and its perceived lower complication rate. The aim of this systematic review protocol is identifying differences in rates of infection, nonunion, and malunion of extra-articular femoral and tibial shaft fractures in LMICs treated with either internal or external fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review protocol describes a broad search of multiple databases to identify eligible papers. Studies must be published after 2000, include at least five patients, patients must be aged > 16 years or treated as skeletally mature, and the paper must describe a fracture of interest and at least one of our primary outcomes of interest. We did not place restrictions on language or journal. All abstracts and full texts will be screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias and quality of evidence will be analyzed using standardized appraisal tools. A random-effects meta-analysis followed by a subgroup analysis will be performed, given the anticipated heterogeneity among studies, if sufficient data are available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of easily accessible LMIC outcome data, combined with international clinical guidelines that are often developed by HIC surgeons for use in HIC environments, makes the clinical decision-making process infinitely more difficult for surgeons in LMICs. This protocol will guide research on surgical management, outcomes, and complications of lower limb shaft fractures in LMICs, and can help guide policy development for better surgical intervention delivery and improve global surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 11","pages":"1020-1026"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of external versus internal fixation for traumatic lower limb fractures in low- and middle-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"Manon Pigeolet, Hamaiyal Sana, Morgan R Askew, Shubham Jaswal, Paola F Ortega, Sarah R Bradley, Ayush Shah, Carol Mita, Daniel S Corlew, Ayesha Saeed, Emmanuel Makasa, Kiran J Agarwal-Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Lower limb fractures are common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and represent a significant burden to the existing orthopaedic surgical infrastructure. In high income country (HIC) settings, internal fixation is the standard of care due to its superior outcomes. In LMICs, external fixation is often the surgical treatment of choice due to limited supplies, cost considerations, and its perceived lower complication rate. The aim of this systematic review protocol is identifying differences in rates of infection, nonunion, and malunion of extra-articular femoral and tibial shaft fractures in LMICs treated with either internal or external fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review protocol describes a broad search of multiple databases to identify eligible papers. Studies must be published after 2000, include at least five patients, patients must be aged > 16 years or treated as skeletally mature, and the paper must describe a fracture of interest and at least one of our primary outcomes of interest. We did not place restrictions on language or journal. All abstracts and full texts will be screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias and quality of evidence will be analyzed using standardized appraisal tools. A random-effects meta-analysis followed by a subgroup analysis will be performed, given the anticipated heterogeneity among studies, if sufficient data are available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of easily accessible LMIC outcome data, combined with international clinical guidelines that are often developed by HIC surgeons for use in HIC environments, makes the clinical decision-making process infinitely more difficult for surgeons in LMICs. This protocol will guide research on surgical management, outcomes, and complications of lower limb shaft fractures in LMICs, and can help guide policy development for better surgical intervention delivery and improve global surgical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 11\",\"pages\":\"1020-1026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550902/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下肢骨折是中低收入国家(LMIC)的常见病,给现有的骨科外科基础设施带来了沉重负担。在高收入国家(HIC),内固定因其卓越的疗效而成为治疗标准。在低收入国家/地区,由于供应有限、成本考虑以及并发症发生率较低,外固定通常是首选的手术治疗方法。本系统性综述旨在确定在低收入国家采用内固定或外固定治疗的股骨和胫骨关节外骨折的感染率、不愈合率和愈合不良率的差异:本系统综述方案描述了对多个数据库进行广泛检索以确定符合条件的论文。研究必须发表于 2000 年之后,至少包括五名患者,患者年龄必须大于 16 岁或骨骼发育成熟,论文必须描述相关骨折和至少一项主要研究结果。我们对语言或期刊没有限制。所有摘要和全文将由两名独立审稿人进行筛选和摘录。将使用标准化评估工具分析偏倚风险和证据质量。考虑到研究之间的预期异质性,如果有足够的数据,将进行随机效应荟萃分析,然后进行亚组分析:缺乏易于获取的低收入国家和地区的结果数据,再加上国际临床指南通常是由高收入国家和地区的外科医生为在高收入国家和地区的环境中使用而制定的,这使得低收入国家和地区的外科医生在临床决策过程中困难重重。该方案将指导有关低收入国家和地区下肢轴骨折的手术管理、结果和并发症的研究,并有助于指导政策制定,以提供更好的手术干预和改善全球外科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of external versus internal fixation for traumatic lower limb fractures in low- and middle-income countries.

Aims: Lower limb fractures are common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and represent a significant burden to the existing orthopaedic surgical infrastructure. In high income country (HIC) settings, internal fixation is the standard of care due to its superior outcomes. In LMICs, external fixation is often the surgical treatment of choice due to limited supplies, cost considerations, and its perceived lower complication rate. The aim of this systematic review protocol is identifying differences in rates of infection, nonunion, and malunion of extra-articular femoral and tibial shaft fractures in LMICs treated with either internal or external fixation.

Methods: This systematic review protocol describes a broad search of multiple databases to identify eligible papers. Studies must be published after 2000, include at least five patients, patients must be aged > 16 years or treated as skeletally mature, and the paper must describe a fracture of interest and at least one of our primary outcomes of interest. We did not place restrictions on language or journal. All abstracts and full texts will be screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias and quality of evidence will be analyzed using standardized appraisal tools. A random-effects meta-analysis followed by a subgroup analysis will be performed, given the anticipated heterogeneity among studies, if sufficient data are available.

Conclusion: The lack of easily accessible LMIC outcome data, combined with international clinical guidelines that are often developed by HIC surgeons for use in HIC environments, makes the clinical decision-making process infinitely more difficult for surgeons in LMICs. This protocol will guide research on surgical management, outcomes, and complications of lower limb shaft fractures in LMICs, and can help guide policy development for better surgical intervention delivery and improve global surgical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信