一家安全网医院的症状性胆石症患者:外科医生的早期参与很重要。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jasmine Guliani, Rachel I Bartelson, Fareeda Eraky, Shyamin Mehra, Nina E Glass, Nisha Narula
{"title":"一家安全网医院的症状性胆石症患者:外科医生的早期参与很重要。","authors":"Jasmine Guliani, Rachel I Bartelson, Fareeda Eraky, Shyamin Mehra, Nina E Glass, Nisha Narula","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallstones are a common diagnosis in the United States; though many patients remain asymptomatic, others develop symptoms. Standard of care for symptomatic cholelithiasis is cholecystectomy, but many do not undergo surgery. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence receipt of cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis at a safety net hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study performed at a large, academic, tertiary care and safety net state hospital. Patients who presented with symptomatic cholelithiasis were included. Same admission cholecystectomy and elective outpatient cholecystectomy were considered success/standard of care, and readmission cholecystectomy or no cholecystectomy were considered failures/not standard of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 376 patients, a substantial minority were Spanish speaking, and almost half had public insurance. 23.7% were successfully treated, and 76.3% had failure in management. A larger number of patients in the group that had successful treatment had surgery consultation, 67.4%. Only 28.5% of patients saw a surgeon as an outpatient within 30 days of their visit. On multivariable analysis, patients who were provided a surgery consultation were more likely to receive standard of care. Age, sex, language, smoking status, lack of insurance, and alcohol use were not associated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgery consultation during presentation for symptomatic cholelithiasis was associated with receipt of same admission, or outpatient elective cholecystectomy, or successful management. There should be a low threshold to involve a surgeon for symptomatic cholelithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis at a safety net hospital: Early surgeon involvement matters.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine Guliani, Rachel I Bartelson, Fareeda Eraky, Shyamin Mehra, Nina E Glass, Nisha Narula\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.12399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallstones are a common diagnosis in the United States; though many patients remain asymptomatic, others develop symptoms. Standard of care for symptomatic cholelithiasis is cholecystectomy, but many do not undergo surgery. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence receipt of cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis at a safety net hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study performed at a large, academic, tertiary care and safety net state hospital. Patients who presented with symptomatic cholelithiasis were included. Same admission cholecystectomy and elective outpatient cholecystectomy were considered success/standard of care, and readmission cholecystectomy or no cholecystectomy were considered failures/not standard of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 376 patients, a substantial minority were Spanish speaking, and almost half had public insurance. 23.7% were successfully treated, and 76.3% had failure in management. A larger number of patients in the group that had successful treatment had surgery consultation, 67.4%. Only 28.5% of patients saw a surgeon as an outpatient within 30 days of their visit. On multivariable analysis, patients who were provided a surgery consultation were more likely to receive standard of care. Age, sex, language, smoking status, lack of insurance, and alcohol use were not associated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgery consultation during presentation for symptomatic cholelithiasis was associated with receipt of same admission, or outpatient elective cholecystectomy, or successful management. There should be a low threshold to involve a surgeon for symptomatic cholelithiasis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12399\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,胆结石是一种常见的诊断方法;虽然许多患者没有症状,但也有一些患者会出现症状。无症状胆石症的标准治疗方法是胆囊切除术,但许多患者并未接受手术。本研究旨在确定影响一家安全网医院接受症状性胆石症胆囊切除术的因素:本研究是一项回顾性研究,在一家大型学术性三级医疗安全网州立医院进行。研究纳入了出现症状性胆石症的患者。同一入院的胆囊切除术和择期门诊胆囊切除术被视为成功/标准治疗,再次入院的胆囊切除术或未进行胆囊切除术被视为失败/非标准治疗:在376名患者中,讲西班牙语的患者占了相当大的比例,近一半的患者有公共保险。23.7%的患者治疗成功,76.3%的患者治疗失败。在治疗成功的患者群体中,67.4%的患者接受过手术咨询。只有 28.5%的患者在就诊后 30 天内向外科医生进行了门诊咨询。经多变量分析,接受过手术咨询的患者更有可能接受标准护理。年龄、性别、语言、吸烟状况、无保险和酗酒与这些因素无关:结论:有症状的胆石症患者在就诊时接受外科会诊与接受同次入院、门诊择期胆囊切除术或成功治疗有关。对于无症状胆石症,外科医生介入的门槛应该很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis at a safety net hospital: Early surgeon involvement matters.

Background: Gallstones are a common diagnosis in the United States; though many patients remain asymptomatic, others develop symptoms. Standard of care for symptomatic cholelithiasis is cholecystectomy, but many do not undergo surgery. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence receipt of cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis at a safety net hospital.

Methods: This is a retrospective study performed at a large, academic, tertiary care and safety net state hospital. Patients who presented with symptomatic cholelithiasis were included. Same admission cholecystectomy and elective outpatient cholecystectomy were considered success/standard of care, and readmission cholecystectomy or no cholecystectomy were considered failures/not standard of care.

Results: Of 376 patients, a substantial minority were Spanish speaking, and almost half had public insurance. 23.7% were successfully treated, and 76.3% had failure in management. A larger number of patients in the group that had successful treatment had surgery consultation, 67.4%. Only 28.5% of patients saw a surgeon as an outpatient within 30 days of their visit. On multivariable analysis, patients who were provided a surgery consultation were more likely to receive standard of care. Age, sex, language, smoking status, lack of insurance, and alcohol use were not associated.

Conclusion: Surgery consultation during presentation for symptomatic cholelithiasis was associated with receipt of same admission, or outpatient elective cholecystectomy, or successful management. There should be a low threshold to involve a surgeon for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信