甲状腺峡部结节和癌的细胞学和分子评估

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thyroid Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0254
Sina Jasim, Allan Golding, David Bimston, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Yang Chen, Ruochen Jiang, Yangyang Hao, Jing Huang, Joshua P Klopper, Richard T Kloos, Taylor C Brown
{"title":"甲状腺峡部结节和癌的细胞学和分子评估","authors":"Sina Jasim, Allan Golding, David Bimston, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Yang Chen, Ruochen Jiang, Yangyang Hao, Jing Huang, Joshua P Klopper, Richard T Kloos, Taylor C Brown","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Isthmic thyroid nodules are more likely to be malignant and isthmic differentiated thyroid cancer demonstrates less favorable behavior compared with lobar locations. The goal of this study was to assess molecular differences of thyroid nodules and carcinomas from the isthmus relative to the lobes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Afirma thyroid nodule database (<i>n</i> = 177,227) was assessed for cytologic and molecular differences between isthmus and lobar nodules in this observational cohort study. Genome-wide differential expression analysis was conducted to decipher transcriptomic differences. Histopathology reports (<i>n</i> = 583) of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) (<i>n</i> = 389) and infiltrative follicular subtype of PTC (IF-PTC) (<i>n</i> = 194) from Afirma discovery cohorts and from thyroid cancer patients managed at an integrative endocrine surgery community care practice were analyzed for molecular differences between isthmic and lobar cancers. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the Afirma database, 8527 (4.8%) isthmus nodules were identified. Bethesda V-VI nodules were almost twice as prevalent from the isthmus as compared with the lobes (8.2% vs. 4.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Isthmus nodules had twice the frequency of <i>BRAFp.<sup>V600E</sup></i> (21% vs. 10.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), an increased frequency of <i>ALK</i>/<i>NTRK</i>/<i>RET</i> fusions (4.6% vs. 2.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and <i>SPOP</i> variants (1.5% vs. 0.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and a lower frequency of <i>NRAS</i> mutations (7.8% vs. 13.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and <i>PAX8::PPARy</i> fusions (1.1% vs. 2.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) than lobar nodules. Transcriptome analysis of molecular signatures and genome-wide analysis showed that isthmus nodules have higher <i>BRAF</i>-like scores, ERK activity, follicular mesenchymal transition scores (FMT), and lower inflammation activity scores. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed genes downregulated in isthmus tumors are enriched in immune response regulation. IF-PTC from the isthmus (<i>n</i> = 13) were more <i>BRAF</i>-like and had increased ERK and FMT scores compared with those from the lobes (<i>n</i> = 181) (<i>p</i> < 0.01 for all). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These data suggest isthmic nodules are more likely to have malignant cytology and increased rates of higher risk molecular alterations compared with lobar nodules. IF-PTC from the isthmus is molecularly different compared with IF-PTC from the lobes. More data are needed to know if a change in surgical therapy is warranted in isthmic thyroid cancers relative to lobar cancers and if this molecular data should influence isthmic thyroid cancer management and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytologic and Molecular Assessment of Isthmus Thyroid Nodules and Carcinomas.\",\"authors\":\"Sina Jasim, Allan Golding, David Bimston, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Yang Chen, Ruochen Jiang, Yangyang Hao, Jing Huang, Joshua P Klopper, Richard T Kloos, Taylor C Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/thy.2024.0254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Isthmic thyroid nodules are more likely to be malignant and isthmic differentiated thyroid cancer demonstrates less favorable behavior compared with lobar locations. The goal of this study was to assess molecular differences of thyroid nodules and carcinomas from the isthmus relative to the lobes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Afirma thyroid nodule database (<i>n</i> = 177,227) was assessed for cytologic and molecular differences between isthmus and lobar nodules in this observational cohort study. Genome-wide differential expression analysis was conducted to decipher transcriptomic differences. Histopathology reports (<i>n</i> = 583) of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) (<i>n</i> = 389) and infiltrative follicular subtype of PTC (IF-PTC) (<i>n</i> = 194) from Afirma discovery cohorts and from thyroid cancer patients managed at an integrative endocrine surgery community care practice were analyzed for molecular differences between isthmic and lobar cancers. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the Afirma database, 8527 (4.8%) isthmus nodules were identified. Bethesda V-VI nodules were almost twice as prevalent from the isthmus as compared with the lobes (8.2% vs. 4.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Isthmus nodules had twice the frequency of <i>BRAFp.<sup>V600E</sup></i> (21% vs. 10.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), an increased frequency of <i>ALK</i>/<i>NTRK</i>/<i>RET</i> fusions (4.6% vs. 2.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and <i>SPOP</i> variants (1.5% vs. 0.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and a lower frequency of <i>NRAS</i> mutations (7.8% vs. 13.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and <i>PAX8::PPARy</i> fusions (1.1% vs. 2.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) than lobar nodules. Transcriptome analysis of molecular signatures and genome-wide analysis showed that isthmus nodules have higher <i>BRAF</i>-like scores, ERK activity, follicular mesenchymal transition scores (FMT), and lower inflammation activity scores. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed genes downregulated in isthmus tumors are enriched in immune response regulation. IF-PTC from the isthmus (<i>n</i> = 13) were more <i>BRAF</i>-like and had increased ERK and FMT scores compared with those from the lobes (<i>n</i> = 181) (<i>p</i> < 0.01 for all). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These data suggest isthmic nodules are more likely to have malignant cytology and increased rates of higher risk molecular alterations compared with lobar nodules. IF-PTC from the isthmus is molecularly different compared with IF-PTC from the lobes. More data are needed to know if a change in surgical therapy is warranted in isthmic thyroid cancers relative to lobar cancers and if this molecular data should influence isthmic thyroid cancer management and monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thyroid\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thyroid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0254\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:峡部甲状腺结节更有可能恶变,而峡部分化型甲状腺癌与叶状部位相比表现较差。本研究的目的是评估峡部甲状腺结节和癌的分子差异。研究方法在这项观察性队列研究中,对Afirma甲状腺结节数据库(n = 177,227)进行了评估,以了解峡部结节和叶状结节的细胞学和分子差异。进行了全基因组差异表达分析,以解读转录组差异。对Afirma发现队列中的甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)(n = 389)和浸润性滤泡亚型甲状腺乳头状癌(IF-PTC)(n = 194)的组织病理学报告(n = 583),以及在综合内分泌外科社区医疗机构接受治疗的甲状腺癌患者的组织病理学报告(n = 194)进行了分析,以了解峡部癌和叶状结节癌之间的分子差异。结果显示在 Afirma 数据库中,发现了 8527 个(4.8%)峡部结节。与肺叶相比,峡部贝塞斯达 V-VI 结节的发病率几乎是肺叶的两倍(8.2% 对 4.3%,P < 0.0001)。峡部结节的BRAFp.V600E频率是叶部的两倍(21% vs. 10.6%,p < 0.0001),ALK/NTRK/RET融合(4.6% vs. 2.5%,p < 0.0001)和SPOP变异(1.5% vs. 0.8%,p < 0.0001),而 NRAS 突变(7.8% vs. 13.2%,p < 0.0001)和 PAX8::PPARy 融合(1.1% vs. 2.3%,p < 0.0001)的频率低于肺叶结节。分子特征转录组分析和全基因组分析显示,峡部结节具有较高的BRAF样评分、ERK活性、滤泡间质转化评分(FMT)和较低的炎症活性评分。通路富集分析显示,峡部肿瘤中下调的基因富集于免疫反应调控中。与来自肺叶的肿瘤(n = 181)相比,来自峡部的 IF-PTC (n = 13)更具 BRAF 样性,ERK 和 FMT 评分也更高(P < 0.01)。结论这些数据表明,与肺叶结节相比,峡部结节更有可能出现恶性细胞学改变,高风险分子改变的发生率也更高。峡部的 IF-PTC 与肺叶的 IF-PTC 在分子上有所不同。我们需要更多的数据来了解峡部甲状腺癌与叶状腺癌相比是否需要改变手术疗法,以及这些分子数据是否会影响峡部甲状腺癌的管理和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cytologic and Molecular Assessment of Isthmus Thyroid Nodules and Carcinomas.

Background: Isthmic thyroid nodules are more likely to be malignant and isthmic differentiated thyroid cancer demonstrates less favorable behavior compared with lobar locations. The goal of this study was to assess molecular differences of thyroid nodules and carcinomas from the isthmus relative to the lobes. Methods: The Afirma thyroid nodule database (n = 177,227) was assessed for cytologic and molecular differences between isthmus and lobar nodules in this observational cohort study. Genome-wide differential expression analysis was conducted to decipher transcriptomic differences. Histopathology reports (n = 583) of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) (n = 389) and infiltrative follicular subtype of PTC (IF-PTC) (n = 194) from Afirma discovery cohorts and from thyroid cancer patients managed at an integrative endocrine surgery community care practice were analyzed for molecular differences between isthmic and lobar cancers. Results: In the Afirma database, 8527 (4.8%) isthmus nodules were identified. Bethesda V-VI nodules were almost twice as prevalent from the isthmus as compared with the lobes (8.2% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.0001). Isthmus nodules had twice the frequency of BRAFp.V600E (21% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.0001), an increased frequency of ALK/NTRK/RET fusions (4.6% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.0001) and SPOP variants (1.5% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.0001), and a lower frequency of NRAS mutations (7.8% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.0001), and PAX8::PPARy fusions (1.1% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.0001) than lobar nodules. Transcriptome analysis of molecular signatures and genome-wide analysis showed that isthmus nodules have higher BRAF-like scores, ERK activity, follicular mesenchymal transition scores (FMT), and lower inflammation activity scores. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed genes downregulated in isthmus tumors are enriched in immune response regulation. IF-PTC from the isthmus (n = 13) were more BRAF-like and had increased ERK and FMT scores compared with those from the lobes (n = 181) (p < 0.01 for all). Conclusions: These data suggest isthmic nodules are more likely to have malignant cytology and increased rates of higher risk molecular alterations compared with lobar nodules. IF-PTC from the isthmus is molecularly different compared with IF-PTC from the lobes. More data are needed to know if a change in surgical therapy is warranted in isthmic thyroid cancers relative to lobar cancers and if this molecular data should influence isthmic thyroid cancer management and monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信