支持临床试验的多样性:医学领域的公平突破成熟度模型。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08594-9
Tesheia Harris, Marcella Nunez-Smith, Sakinah C Suttiratana, Samantha L Fretz, Savannah Leonard, Erika Linnander, Leslie A Curry
{"title":"支持临床试验的多样性:医学领域的公平突破成熟度模型。","authors":"Tesheia Harris, Marcella Nunez-Smith, Sakinah C Suttiratana, Samantha L Fretz, Savannah Leonard, Erika Linnander, Leslie A Curry","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08594-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the most powerful barriers to broader inclusion of diverse participants in clinical trials are social determinants of health, trustworthiness of health care providers and research institutions, and competing pressures on potential participants. Nevertheless, current tools to assess organizational capabilities for clinical trial diversity focus primarily on trial infrastructure, rely solely on quantitative self-reported data, and lack meaningful assessment of capabilities related to community engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Equitable Breakthroughs in Medicine (EQBMED) initiative developed a holistic, collaborative, site-driven formative model and accompanying assessment to catalog sites' current capabilities and identify opportunities for growth in both conducting industry-sponsored clinical trials and enriching diversity of those trials. The model builds upon prior work and reflects unification of two historically distinct components-research operations and community engagement-since sustainable clinical trial diversity efforts must overcome these silos. Here we present the methodology we used to develop the model and accompanying assessment, describe how findings can support clinical trial diversity efforts, and report findings from early field testing at three U.S. sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first three sites were diverse in size (e.g., < 250-1 K beds), with varying levels of clinical trial capabilities and community engagement. The maturity assessment laid the foundation for sites to identify and prioritize key areas to advance clinical trial diversity capabilities, and each has made tangible progress. In parallel to completing the assessment with these early sites to understand their maturity and set actionable goals, we also collected their feedback on content validity (e.g., clarity, comprehensiveness, terminology) and feasibility (e.g., ability to collect needed information and data, time required). We describe refinements made to improve the assessment and streamline the process. The EQBMED program will deploy the assessment across various site types (e.g., FQHCs, safety net hospitals) and make further refinements as warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategic investment in clinical trial diversity requires structured assessment of site maturity as a starting point for collaborative action. We propose the EQBMED maturity model as a first step toward informing efforts to increase representation of diverse populations in clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting diversity in clinical trials: the equitable breakthroughs in medicine site maturity model.\",\"authors\":\"Tesheia Harris, Marcella Nunez-Smith, Sakinah C Suttiratana, Samantha L Fretz, Savannah Leonard, Erika Linnander, Leslie A Curry\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08594-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the most powerful barriers to broader inclusion of diverse participants in clinical trials are social determinants of health, trustworthiness of health care providers and research institutions, and competing pressures on potential participants. Nevertheless, current tools to assess organizational capabilities for clinical trial diversity focus primarily on trial infrastructure, rely solely on quantitative self-reported data, and lack meaningful assessment of capabilities related to community engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Equitable Breakthroughs in Medicine (EQBMED) initiative developed a holistic, collaborative, site-driven formative model and accompanying assessment to catalog sites' current capabilities and identify opportunities for growth in both conducting industry-sponsored clinical trials and enriching diversity of those trials. The model builds upon prior work and reflects unification of two historically distinct components-research operations and community engagement-since sustainable clinical trial diversity efforts must overcome these silos. Here we present the methodology we used to develop the model and accompanying assessment, describe how findings can support clinical trial diversity efforts, and report findings from early field testing at three U.S. sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first three sites were diverse in size (e.g., < 250-1 K beds), with varying levels of clinical trial capabilities and community engagement. The maturity assessment laid the foundation for sites to identify and prioritize key areas to advance clinical trial diversity capabilities, and each has made tangible progress. In parallel to completing the assessment with these early sites to understand their maturity and set actionable goals, we also collected their feedback on content validity (e.g., clarity, comprehensiveness, terminology) and feasibility (e.g., ability to collect needed information and data, time required). We describe refinements made to improve the assessment and streamline the process. The EQBMED program will deploy the assessment across various site types (e.g., FQHCs, safety net hospitals) and make further refinements as warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategic investment in clinical trial diversity requires structured assessment of site maturity as a starting point for collaborative action. We propose the EQBMED maturity model as a first step toward informing efforts to increase representation of diverse populations in clinical research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08594-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08594-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康的社会决定因素、医疗服务提供者和研究机构的可信度以及潜在参与者面临的竞争压力是阻碍临床试验更广泛纳入多元化参与者的最大障碍。然而,目前评估临床试验多样性组织能力的工具主要集中在试验基础设施上,仅依赖于定量的自我报告数据,缺乏对社区参与相关能力的有意义评估:公平医学突破(EQBMED)计划开发了一个整体、协作、研究机构驱动的形成性模型和配套评估,以记录研究机构当前的能力,并确定在开展行业赞助的临床试验和丰富这些试验的多样性方面的发展机会。该模型以之前的工作为基础,将研究运营和社区参与这两个历来不同的组成部分统一起来,因为可持续的临床试验多样性工作必须克服这些孤岛现象。在此,我们介绍了开发该模型和相应评估所使用的方法,描述了研究结果如何支持临床试验多样性工作,并报告了在美国三个研究机构进行早期实地测试的结果:结果:前三个研究机构的规模各不相同(例如,结论:我们的研究机构在规模上与其他研究机构不同):对临床试验多样性的战略投资需要对研究机构的成熟度进行结构化评估,以此作为合作行动的起点。我们建议将 EQBMED 成熟度模型作为第一步,为提高临床研究中多元化人群的代表性提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting diversity in clinical trials: the equitable breakthroughs in medicine site maturity model.

Background: Among the most powerful barriers to broader inclusion of diverse participants in clinical trials are social determinants of health, trustworthiness of health care providers and research institutions, and competing pressures on potential participants. Nevertheless, current tools to assess organizational capabilities for clinical trial diversity focus primarily on trial infrastructure, rely solely on quantitative self-reported data, and lack meaningful assessment of capabilities related to community engagement.

Methods: The Equitable Breakthroughs in Medicine (EQBMED) initiative developed a holistic, collaborative, site-driven formative model and accompanying assessment to catalog sites' current capabilities and identify opportunities for growth in both conducting industry-sponsored clinical trials and enriching diversity of those trials. The model builds upon prior work and reflects unification of two historically distinct components-research operations and community engagement-since sustainable clinical trial diversity efforts must overcome these silos. Here we present the methodology we used to develop the model and accompanying assessment, describe how findings can support clinical trial diversity efforts, and report findings from early field testing at three U.S. sites.

Results: The first three sites were diverse in size (e.g., < 250-1 K beds), with varying levels of clinical trial capabilities and community engagement. The maturity assessment laid the foundation for sites to identify and prioritize key areas to advance clinical trial diversity capabilities, and each has made tangible progress. In parallel to completing the assessment with these early sites to understand their maturity and set actionable goals, we also collected their feedback on content validity (e.g., clarity, comprehensiveness, terminology) and feasibility (e.g., ability to collect needed information and data, time required). We describe refinements made to improve the assessment and streamline the process. The EQBMED program will deploy the assessment across various site types (e.g., FQHCs, safety net hospitals) and make further refinements as warranted.

Conclusions: Strategic investment in clinical trial diversity requires structured assessment of site maturity as a starting point for collaborative action. We propose the EQBMED maturity model as a first step toward informing efforts to increase representation of diverse populations in clinical research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信