内镜下静脉曲张结扎术与非选择性β-受体阻滞剂在 2 型胃食管静脉曲张一级预防中的疗效比较:一项 IPTW 调整后的研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Linxiang Liu, Shenfeng Ye, Yuan Nie, Xuan Zhu
{"title":"内镜下静脉曲张结扎术与非选择性β-受体阻滞剂在 2 型胃食管静脉曲张一级预防中的疗效比较:一项 IPTW 调整后的研究。","authors":"Linxiang Liu, Shenfeng Ye, Yuan Nie, Xuan Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11396-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice guidelines recommend non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for primary prevention in cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices. However, there is no clear recommendation for primary prevention strategies for gastric varices, particularly GOV-2. Our objective is to investigate the incidence of initial bleeding and liver-related complications when NSBB and EVL are used for primary prevention in GOV-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients with GOV-2 gastric varices. Patients were divided into the NSBB group or the EVL group. Differences in the incidence of initial bleeding within 1 year, as well as the occurrence of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy and ascites, were compared between the two groups before and after adjustment for Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent risk factors for the first bleeding event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 60 patients in the NSBB group and 66 patients in the EVL group. Before IPTW adjustment, there were differences between the two groups in sex, portal hypertensive gastropathy, esophageal variceal diameter, red signs, FIB-4, and MELD scores. After IPTW adjustment, these differences were balanced, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) within acceptable ranges. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference in bleeding rates between the two groups before or after IPTW adjustment. After IPTW adjustment, Cox regression analysis identified esophageal variceal diameter (HR:5.59 (2.03-15.39), p < 0.001) and MELD score (HR:1.17 (1.01-1.23), p = 0.042) were independent risk factors for bleeding. NSBB treatment did not reduce the incidence of liver-related complications within one year compared to EVL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For primary prevention of bleeding in cirrhotic patients with GOV-2, EVL does not significantly reduce initial bleeding episodes or liver-related complications compared to NSBB.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation versus non-selective beta-blockers in primary prevention of gastroesophageal varix type 2: an IPTW-adjusted study.\",\"authors\":\"Linxiang Liu, Shenfeng Ye, Yuan Nie, Xuan Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-024-11396-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice guidelines recommend non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for primary prevention in cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices. However, there is no clear recommendation for primary prevention strategies for gastric varices, particularly GOV-2. Our objective is to investigate the incidence of initial bleeding and liver-related complications when NSBB and EVL are used for primary prevention in GOV-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients with GOV-2 gastric varices. Patients were divided into the NSBB group or the EVL group. Differences in the incidence of initial bleeding within 1 year, as well as the occurrence of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy and ascites, were compared between the two groups before and after adjustment for Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent risk factors for the first bleeding event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 60 patients in the NSBB group and 66 patients in the EVL group. Before IPTW adjustment, there were differences between the two groups in sex, portal hypertensive gastropathy, esophageal variceal diameter, red signs, FIB-4, and MELD scores. After IPTW adjustment, these differences were balanced, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) within acceptable ranges. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference in bleeding rates between the two groups before or after IPTW adjustment. After IPTW adjustment, Cox regression analysis identified esophageal variceal diameter (HR:5.59 (2.03-15.39), p < 0.001) and MELD score (HR:1.17 (1.01-1.23), p = 0.042) were independent risk factors for bleeding. NSBB treatment did not reduce the incidence of liver-related complications within one year compared to EVL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For primary prevention of bleeding in cirrhotic patients with GOV-2, EVL does not significantly reduce initial bleeding episodes or liver-related complications compared to NSBB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11396-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11396-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实践指南推荐食管静脉曲张肝硬化患者使用非选择性β-受体阻滞剂(NSBB)和内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)进行一级预防。然而,对于胃静脉曲张(尤其是 GOV-2)的一级预防策略还没有明确的建议。我们的目的是研究在 GOV-2 的一级预防中使用 NSBB 和 EVL 时,初始出血和肝脏相关并发症的发生率:我们对 GOV-2 胃静脉曲张患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为 NSBB 组和 EVL 组。比较了两组患者在调整逆治疗概率加权(IPTW)前后 1 年内初次出血发生率以及肝性脑病和腹水等并发症发生率的差异。采用 Cox 比例危险模型确定首次出血事件的独立危险因素:结果:NSBB组有60名患者,EVL组有66名患者。在IPTW调整前,两组患者在性别、门脉高压性胃病、食管静脉曲张直径、红色征象、FIB-4和MELD评分方面存在差异。经过 IPTW 调整后,这些差异趋于平衡,标准化平均差 (SMD) 在可接受的范围内。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析表明,在 IPTW 调整前后,两组患者的出血率没有差异。经过 IPTW 调整后,Cox 回归分析确定了食管静脉曲张直径(HR:5.59 (2.03-15.39),P 结论:IPTW 可用于肝硬化患者出血的一级预防:对于GOV-2肝硬化患者出血的一级预防,与NSBB相比,EVL并不能显著减少初始出血发作或肝脏相关并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation versus non-selective beta-blockers in primary prevention of gastroesophageal varix type 2: an IPTW-adjusted study.

Background: Practice guidelines recommend non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for primary prevention in cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices. However, there is no clear recommendation for primary prevention strategies for gastric varices, particularly GOV-2. Our objective is to investigate the incidence of initial bleeding and liver-related complications when NSBB and EVL are used for primary prevention in GOV-2.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients with GOV-2 gastric varices. Patients were divided into the NSBB group or the EVL group. Differences in the incidence of initial bleeding within 1 year, as well as the occurrence of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy and ascites, were compared between the two groups before and after adjustment for Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent risk factors for the first bleeding event.

Results: There were 60 patients in the NSBB group and 66 patients in the EVL group. Before IPTW adjustment, there were differences between the two groups in sex, portal hypertensive gastropathy, esophageal variceal diameter, red signs, FIB-4, and MELD scores. After IPTW adjustment, these differences were balanced, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) within acceptable ranges. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference in bleeding rates between the two groups before or after IPTW adjustment. After IPTW adjustment, Cox regression analysis identified esophageal variceal diameter (HR:5.59 (2.03-15.39), p < 0.001) and MELD score (HR:1.17 (1.01-1.23), p = 0.042) were independent risk factors for bleeding. NSBB treatment did not reduce the incidence of liver-related complications within one year compared to EVL.

Conclusion: For primary prevention of bleeding in cirrhotic patients with GOV-2, EVL does not significantly reduce initial bleeding episodes or liver-related complications compared to NSBB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信