骨髓增生异常综合征患者早期试验中的患者报告结果。

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Seminars in hematology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.10.010
Tito Mendoza, Amanda L King, Elizabeth Vera, Alain Mina, Kathy McGraw, Steven Pavletic, Terri S Armstrong
{"title":"骨髓增生异常综合征患者早期试验中的患者报告结果。","authors":"Tito Mendoza, Amanda L King, Elizabeth Vera, Alain Mina, Kathy McGraw, Steven Pavletic, Terri S Armstrong","doi":"10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience a wide range of symptoms due both to their underlying disease and the effects of treatment. Designing early phase trials to explore effective therapies in these patients should not only examine anti-tumor activity, but also consider the effects of treatments on how patients feel and function. Assessing symptomatic toxicities associated with new therapies in early phase trials from the patient perspective is best measured using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and offers valuable insight and complementary information to the traditional adverse event reporting in cancer clinical trials. This review describes PROs, highlights their importance in MDS drug development, and outlines the key psychometric properties and practical considerations that make PROs essential and desirable in evaluating the impact of new therapies. We will provide a general overview of PROs and follow with application of PROs in MDS/AML including strategies to be considered in early phase trials. Finally, we describe the creation of the Office of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research at the US National Institutes of Health which has developed a standardized PROs methodology for early phase trials conducted in the Center for Cancer Research at the US National Cancer Institute.</p>","PeriodicalId":21684,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in hematology","volume":" ","pages":"457-464"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcomes in early phase trials for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.\",\"authors\":\"Tito Mendoza, Amanda L King, Elizabeth Vera, Alain Mina, Kathy McGraw, Steven Pavletic, Terri S Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.10.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience a wide range of symptoms due both to their underlying disease and the effects of treatment. Designing early phase trials to explore effective therapies in these patients should not only examine anti-tumor activity, but also consider the effects of treatments on how patients feel and function. Assessing symptomatic toxicities associated with new therapies in early phase trials from the patient perspective is best measured using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and offers valuable insight and complementary information to the traditional adverse event reporting in cancer clinical trials. This review describes PROs, highlights their importance in MDS drug development, and outlines the key psychometric properties and practical considerations that make PROs essential and desirable in evaluating the impact of new therapies. We will provide a general overview of PROs and follow with application of PROs in MDS/AML including strategies to be considered in early phase trials. Finally, we describe the creation of the Office of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research at the US National Institutes of Health which has developed a standardized PROs methodology for early phase trials conducted in the Center for Cancer Research at the US National Cancer Institute.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"457-464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.10.010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.10.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)或急性髓性白血病(AML)患者会因潜在疾病和治疗效果而出现各种症状。在设计早期试验以探索针对这些患者的有效疗法时,不仅要检查抗肿瘤活性,还要考虑治疗对患者感觉和功能的影响。从患者的角度评估早期试验中与新疗法相关的症状性毒性,最好使用患者报告的结果(PROs)来衡量,它为癌症临床试验中传统的不良事件报告提供了宝贵的见解和补充信息。本综述介绍了患者报告结果,强调了其在 MDS 药物开发中的重要性,并概述了使患者报告结果成为评估新疗法影响的关键和理想方法的关键心理测量学特性和实际考虑因素。我们将对PROs进行总体概述,然后介绍PROs在MDS/AML中的应用,包括在早期阶段试验中需要考虑的策略。最后,我们将介绍美国国立卫生研究院(US National Institutes of Health)设立的以患者为中心的结果研究办公室(Office of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research),该办公室为美国国立癌症研究所(US National Cancer Institute)癌症研究中心(Center for Cancer Research)开展的早期试验制定了标准化的PROs方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-reported outcomes in early phase trials for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience a wide range of symptoms due both to their underlying disease and the effects of treatment. Designing early phase trials to explore effective therapies in these patients should not only examine anti-tumor activity, but also consider the effects of treatments on how patients feel and function. Assessing symptomatic toxicities associated with new therapies in early phase trials from the patient perspective is best measured using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and offers valuable insight and complementary information to the traditional adverse event reporting in cancer clinical trials. This review describes PROs, highlights their importance in MDS drug development, and outlines the key psychometric properties and practical considerations that make PROs essential and desirable in evaluating the impact of new therapies. We will provide a general overview of PROs and follow with application of PROs in MDS/AML including strategies to be considered in early phase trials. Finally, we describe the creation of the Office of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research at the US National Institutes of Health which has developed a standardized PROs methodology for early phase trials conducted in the Center for Cancer Research at the US National Cancer Institute.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in hematology
Seminars in hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.80%
发文量
30
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Hematology aims to present subjects of current importance in clinical hematology, including related areas of oncology, hematopathology, and blood banking. The journal''s unique issue structure allows for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering a variety of articles that present dynamic and front-line material immediately influencing the field. Seminars in Hematology is devoted to making the important and current work accessible, comprehensible, and valuable to the practicing physician, young investigator, clinical practitioners, and internists/paediatricians with strong interests in blood diseases. Seminars in Hematology publishes original research, reviews, short communications and mini- reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信