在对无法切除的腹膜转移瘤进行 PIPAC 指导治疗期间,腹腔镜超声波的影响。

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Pleura and Peritoneum Pub Date : 2024-09-06 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1515/pp-2024-0007
Magnus S Jørgensen, Alan P Ainsworth, Claus W Fristrup, Michael B Mortensen, Martin Graversen
{"title":"在对无法切除的腹膜转移瘤进行 PIPAC 指导治疗期间,腹腔镜超声波的影响。","authors":"Magnus S Jørgensen, Alan P Ainsworth, Claus W Fristrup, Michael B Mortensen, Martin Graversen","doi":"10.1515/pp-2024-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) combines both laparoscopy and ultrasound imaging of the peritoneum liver and retroperitoneum. LUS has not been described in treatments with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). We present our experience with LUS in patients undergoing PIPAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of LUS findings from the prospective PIPAC-OPC2 trial. Main outcome was changes in overall treatment strategy due to LUS findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PIPAC-OPC2 included 143 patients of which 33 patients were treated with electrostatic precipitation PIPAC. Nine patients were excluded due to primary non-access. During PIPAC 1, LUS was performed in 112 of 134 (84 %) PIPAC procedures and changed overall treatment strategy in one patient due to detection of multiple liver metastases unseen by baseline CT. During PIPAC 2 and 3 LUS was performed in 59 of 104 (57 %) and 42 of 78 (54 %) PIPAC procedures, respectively. Throughout PIPAC 1-3, LUS also detected pathological lymph nodes in 16 patients, and focal liver lesions in another four patients of uncertain origin. No further examinations were performed in these patients, and the overall treatment strategy was not changed according to the PIPAC-OPC2 protocol. One patient had a splenic capsule rupture related to the LUS itself. This was managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS may be safely performed during PIPAC. However, LUS has limited clinical impact in patients scheduled for PIPAC, and cannot be recommended as a routine procedure when performing PIPAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":"9 3","pages":"107-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of laparoscopic ultrasound during PIPAC directed treatment of unresectable peritoneal metastasis.\",\"authors\":\"Magnus S Jørgensen, Alan P Ainsworth, Claus W Fristrup, Michael B Mortensen, Martin Graversen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pp-2024-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) combines both laparoscopy and ultrasound imaging of the peritoneum liver and retroperitoneum. LUS has not been described in treatments with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). We present our experience with LUS in patients undergoing PIPAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of LUS findings from the prospective PIPAC-OPC2 trial. Main outcome was changes in overall treatment strategy due to LUS findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PIPAC-OPC2 included 143 patients of which 33 patients were treated with electrostatic precipitation PIPAC. Nine patients were excluded due to primary non-access. During PIPAC 1, LUS was performed in 112 of 134 (84 %) PIPAC procedures and changed overall treatment strategy in one patient due to detection of multiple liver metastases unseen by baseline CT. During PIPAC 2 and 3 LUS was performed in 59 of 104 (57 %) and 42 of 78 (54 %) PIPAC procedures, respectively. Throughout PIPAC 1-3, LUS also detected pathological lymph nodes in 16 patients, and focal liver lesions in another four patients of uncertain origin. No further examinations were performed in these patients, and the overall treatment strategy was not changed according to the PIPAC-OPC2 protocol. One patient had a splenic capsule rupture related to the LUS itself. This was managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS may be safely performed during PIPAC. However, LUS has limited clinical impact in patients scheduled for PIPAC, and cannot be recommended as a routine procedure when performing PIPAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"107-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2024-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2024-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹腔镜超声(LUS)结合了腹腔镜检查和腹膜肝脏及腹膜后超声成像。腹腔镜超声检查在加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)中的应用尚未见报道。我们将介绍在接受 PIPAC 治疗的患者中进行 LUS 的经验:方法:对前瞻性 PIPAC-OPC2 试验的 LUS 结果进行回顾性研究。结果:PIPAC-OPC2试验纳入的患者中,有4名患者接受了LUS治疗:PIPAC-OPC2包括143名患者,其中33名患者接受了静电沉淀PIPAC治疗。9名患者因原发性未入院而被排除在外。在 PIPAC 1 期间,对 134 例 PIPAC 手术中的 112 例(84%)进行了 LUS,并对一名患者改变了整体治疗策略,原因是发现了基线 CT 未见的多个肝转移灶。在 PIPAC 2 和 3 期间,分别在 104 例 PIPAC 手术中的 59 例(57%)和 78 例 PIPAC 手术中的 42 例(54%)进行了 LUS。在整个 PIPAC 1-3 期间,LUS 还检测到 16 例患者的病理淋巴结,以及另外 4 例来源不明的肝脏病灶。这些患者没有接受进一步检查,总体治疗策略也没有根据 PIPAC-OPC2 方案进行改变。一名患者的脾囊破裂与 LUS 本身有关。结论:结论:在 PIPAC 期间可以安全地进行 LUS。然而,LUS 对计划进行 PIPAC 的患者的临床影响有限,因此不能推荐在进行 PIPAC 时将其作为常规手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of laparoscopic ultrasound during PIPAC directed treatment of unresectable peritoneal metastasis.

Objectives: Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) combines both laparoscopy and ultrasound imaging of the peritoneum liver and retroperitoneum. LUS has not been described in treatments with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). We present our experience with LUS in patients undergoing PIPAC.

Methods: Retrospective study of LUS findings from the prospective PIPAC-OPC2 trial. Main outcome was changes in overall treatment strategy due to LUS findings.

Results: PIPAC-OPC2 included 143 patients of which 33 patients were treated with electrostatic precipitation PIPAC. Nine patients were excluded due to primary non-access. During PIPAC 1, LUS was performed in 112 of 134 (84 %) PIPAC procedures and changed overall treatment strategy in one patient due to detection of multiple liver metastases unseen by baseline CT. During PIPAC 2 and 3 LUS was performed in 59 of 104 (57 %) and 42 of 78 (54 %) PIPAC procedures, respectively. Throughout PIPAC 1-3, LUS also detected pathological lymph nodes in 16 patients, and focal liver lesions in another four patients of uncertain origin. No further examinations were performed in these patients, and the overall treatment strategy was not changed according to the PIPAC-OPC2 protocol. One patient had a splenic capsule rupture related to the LUS itself. This was managed conservatively.

Conclusions: LUS may be safely performed during PIPAC. However, LUS has limited clinical impact in patients scheduled for PIPAC, and cannot be recommended as a routine procedure when performing PIPAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信