Fernando Hueso-González, Jonathan Berthold, Patrick Wohlfahrt, Thomas Bortfeld, Chirasak Khamfongkhruea, Sebastian Tattenberg, Melek Zarifi, Joost Verburg, Christian Richter
{"title":"质子射程验证原型与拟人头部模型的中心间比较。","authors":"Fernando Hueso-González, Jonathan Berthold, Patrick Wohlfahrt, Thomas Bortfeld, Chirasak Khamfongkhruea, Sebastian Tattenberg, Melek Zarifi, Joost Verburg, Christian Richter","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. To compare in reproducible and equalized conditions the performance of two independent proton range verification systems based on prompt gamma-ray detectors from two different proton therapy centers.<i>Approach</i>. An anthropomorphic head phantom with calibrated stopping power, serving as ground truth, was irradiated with comparable treatment plans, spot positions and energies in both facilities. Clinical beam current, tumor contour and dose were used. The absolute range measurement was compared to the expected value according to the ground truth. The statistical precision was assessed by repeating each measurement ten times. Sensitivity to relative range shifts was evaluated by introducing 2 mm and 5 mm plastic slabs on half of the field.<i>Main results</i>. The resulting absolute range accuracy was within 2.4 mm in all cases. Relative range shifts were detected with deviations lower than 14%.<i>Significance</i>. The performance of both systems was deemed worthy of clinical application for the detection of range deviations. This study represents the first comparison of independent prompt gamma-ray-based proton range verification systems under equalized conditions with realistic treatment fields and beam currents.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":"69 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-center comparison of proton range verification prototypes with an anthropomorphic head phantom<sup />.\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Hueso-González, Jonathan Berthold, Patrick Wohlfahrt, Thomas Bortfeld, Chirasak Khamfongkhruea, Sebastian Tattenberg, Melek Zarifi, Joost Verburg, Christian Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. To compare in reproducible and equalized conditions the performance of two independent proton range verification systems based on prompt gamma-ray detectors from two different proton therapy centers.<i>Approach</i>. An anthropomorphic head phantom with calibrated stopping power, serving as ground truth, was irradiated with comparable treatment plans, spot positions and energies in both facilities. Clinical beam current, tumor contour and dose were used. The absolute range measurement was compared to the expected value according to the ground truth. The statistical precision was assessed by repeating each measurement ten times. Sensitivity to relative range shifts was evaluated by introducing 2 mm and 5 mm plastic slabs on half of the field.<i>Main results</i>. The resulting absolute range accuracy was within 2.4 mm in all cases. Relative range shifts were detected with deviations lower than 14%.<i>Significance</i>. The performance of both systems was deemed worthy of clinical application for the detection of range deviations. This study represents the first comparison of independent prompt gamma-ray-based proton range verification systems under equalized conditions with realistic treatment fields and beam currents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\"69 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8856\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inter-center comparison of proton range verification prototypes with an anthropomorphic head phantom.
Objective. To compare in reproducible and equalized conditions the performance of two independent proton range verification systems based on prompt gamma-ray detectors from two different proton therapy centers.Approach. An anthropomorphic head phantom with calibrated stopping power, serving as ground truth, was irradiated with comparable treatment plans, spot positions and energies in both facilities. Clinical beam current, tumor contour and dose were used. The absolute range measurement was compared to the expected value according to the ground truth. The statistical precision was assessed by repeating each measurement ten times. Sensitivity to relative range shifts was evaluated by introducing 2 mm and 5 mm plastic slabs on half of the field.Main results. The resulting absolute range accuracy was within 2.4 mm in all cases. Relative range shifts were detected with deviations lower than 14%.Significance. The performance of both systems was deemed worthy of clinical application for the detection of range deviations. This study represents the first comparison of independent prompt gamma-ray-based proton range verification systems under equalized conditions with realistic treatment fields and beam currents.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry