Carl Bellander, Henric Nilsson, Eva Nylander, Kristofer Hedman, Éva Tamás
{"title":"主动脉瓣置换术前后主动脉瓣狭窄患者的心肺运动测试。","authors":"Carl Bellander, Henric Nilsson, Eva Nylander, Kristofer Hedman, Éva Tamás","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge about how patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) perform on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is sparse. Since exercise testing in patients with symptomatic AS is not advised, submaximal parameters could be of special interest. We aimed to investigate maximal and submaximal physical capacity by CPET before and 1 year after surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) in patients with severe AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective longitudinal study, 30 adult patients (age 66±10 years) with severe AS referred for sAVR underwent maximal CPET (respiratory exchange ratio ≥1.05) on a bicycle ergometer before (PRE) and 1 year after (POST) sAVR. Normally distributed data are presented as mean (±SD) and non-normally distributed data are presented as median (IQR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median peak workload increased by 8% from 133 (55) watts at PRE to 144 (67) watts at POST (p<0.001). Median ventilatory threshold (VO<sub>2</sub>@VT) increased from 1216 (391) to 1328 (309) mL/min (p=0.001, n=28). Mean peak oxygen uptake (peakVO<sub>2</sub>) was not significantly different between PRE and POST; 1871±441 vs 1937±404 mL/min (p=0.08). The oxygen uptake efficacy slope (OUES) was significantly correlated to PeakVO2 at both PRE (r=0.889, p<0.05) and POST (r=0.888, p<0.05) CONCLUSION: Physical work capacity was improved 1 year following sAVR, in terms of higher median peak workload and VO<sub>2</sub>@VT. The strong correlation between the submaximal variable OUES and peakVO<sub>2</sub> suggests that OUES might be a useful surrogate of peakVO<sub>2</sub> in this group of patients where maximal exercise testing is not always recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in aortic stenosis patients before and after aortic valve replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Carl Bellander, Henric Nilsson, Eva Nylander, Kristofer Hedman, Éva Tamás\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge about how patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) perform on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is sparse. Since exercise testing in patients with symptomatic AS is not advised, submaximal parameters could be of special interest. We aimed to investigate maximal and submaximal physical capacity by CPET before and 1 year after surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) in patients with severe AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective longitudinal study, 30 adult patients (age 66±10 years) with severe AS referred for sAVR underwent maximal CPET (respiratory exchange ratio ≥1.05) on a bicycle ergometer before (PRE) and 1 year after (POST) sAVR. Normally distributed data are presented as mean (±SD) and non-normally distributed data are presented as median (IQR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median peak workload increased by 8% from 133 (55) watts at PRE to 144 (67) watts at POST (p<0.001). Median ventilatory threshold (VO<sub>2</sub>@VT) increased from 1216 (391) to 1328 (309) mL/min (p=0.001, n=28). Mean peak oxygen uptake (peakVO<sub>2</sub>) was not significantly different between PRE and POST; 1871±441 vs 1937±404 mL/min (p=0.08). The oxygen uptake efficacy slope (OUES) was significantly correlated to PeakVO2 at both PRE (r=0.889, p<0.05) and POST (r=0.888, p<0.05) CONCLUSION: Physical work capacity was improved 1 year following sAVR, in terms of higher median peak workload and VO<sub>2</sub>@VT. The strong correlation between the submaximal variable OUES and peakVO<sub>2</sub> suggests that OUES might be a useful surrogate of peakVO<sub>2</sub> in this group of patients where maximal exercise testing is not always recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者在心肺运动测试(CPET)中的表现,我们所知甚少。由于不建议对有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行运动测试,因此亚极限参数可能特别值得关注。我们的目的是在重度强直性脊柱炎患者进行主动脉瓣置换术(sAVR)前和术后一年,通过 CPET 对其最大和次最大运动能力进行研究:在这项前瞻性纵向研究中,30 名转诊接受主动脉瓣置换术的重度 AS 成人患者(年龄为 66±10 岁)在主动脉瓣置换术前(PRE)和术后一年(POST)在自行车测力计上接受了最大 CPET(呼吸交换比≥1.05)。正态分布数据以平均值(±SD)表示,非正态分布数据以中位数(IQR)表示:结果:中位峰值工作量增加了 8%,从术前的 133 (55) 瓦增至术后的 144 (67) 瓦(p2@VT),从 1216 (391) mL/min 增至 1328 (309) mL/min(p=0.001,n=28)。平均峰值摄氧量(peakVO2)在 PRE 和 POST 之间无显著差异;1871±441 vs 1937±404 毫升/分钟(P=0.08)。摄氧量功效斜率(OUES)与 PRE 和 POST 的峰值摄氧量有明显相关性(r=0.889,p2@VT)。亚极限变量 OUES 与峰值 VO2 之间的强相关性表明,在不总是推荐进行最大运动测试的这组患者中,OUES 可能是峰值 VO2 的有用替代指标。
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in aortic stenosis patients before and after aortic valve replacement.
Background: Knowledge about how patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) perform on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is sparse. Since exercise testing in patients with symptomatic AS is not advised, submaximal parameters could be of special interest. We aimed to investigate maximal and submaximal physical capacity by CPET before and 1 year after surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) in patients with severe AS.
Methods: In this prospective longitudinal study, 30 adult patients (age 66±10 years) with severe AS referred for sAVR underwent maximal CPET (respiratory exchange ratio ≥1.05) on a bicycle ergometer before (PRE) and 1 year after (POST) sAVR. Normally distributed data are presented as mean (±SD) and non-normally distributed data are presented as median (IQR).
Results: Median peak workload increased by 8% from 133 (55) watts at PRE to 144 (67) watts at POST (p<0.001). Median ventilatory threshold (VO2@VT) increased from 1216 (391) to 1328 (309) mL/min (p=0.001, n=28). Mean peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2) was not significantly different between PRE and POST; 1871±441 vs 1937±404 mL/min (p=0.08). The oxygen uptake efficacy slope (OUES) was significantly correlated to PeakVO2 at both PRE (r=0.889, p<0.05) and POST (r=0.888, p<0.05) CONCLUSION: Physical work capacity was improved 1 year following sAVR, in terms of higher median peak workload and VO2@VT. The strong correlation between the submaximal variable OUES and peakVO2 suggests that OUES might be a useful surrogate of peakVO2 in this group of patients where maximal exercise testing is not always recommended.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.