接受PD-1/PD-L1阻断剂治疗的黑色素瘤患者基线中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率与预后的关系:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Michele Kreuz, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Vitor Kendi Tsuchiya Sano, Fernando Luiz Westphal Filho, Ana Laura Soares Silva, Francinny Alves Kelly
{"title":"接受PD-1/PD-L1阻断剂治疗的黑色素瘤患者基线中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率与预后的关系:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Michele Kreuz, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Vitor Kendi Tsuchiya Sano, Fernando Luiz Westphal Filho, Ana Laura Soares Silva, Francinny Alves Kelly","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000001006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunotherapy treatments that target programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma and currently represent the standard first-line treatment for this type of cancer. However, it is still not entirely clear which biomarkers are cost-effective, simple, and highly reliable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the predictive value of the baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) regarding disease progression and overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing high versus low NLR. We performed the meta-analysis using RStudio v4.4.2 software. A total of 20 studies and 2691 patients were included, all with diagnoses of melanoma. The majority of the individuals were male 2278 (84, 65%). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 5.0 to 44.4 and from 1.8 to 15.0 months, respectively. Compared with the high NLR ratio, the low exposure group achieved better rates of OS [hazard ratio (HR), 2.07; 95% CI, 1.73-2.48; P < 0.00001; I² = 47%]. Regarding PFS, there was a statistically significant difference between groups with tendencies toward the low NLR exposure group (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.39-1.81; P < 0.00001; I²=31%]. This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed significant lower OS in melanoma patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade who had elevated baseline NLR values. Furthermore, an increased PFS was observed in patients with a lower baseline NLR value. This study highlights NLR as an important prognostic biomarker for patients with metastatic melanoma who are candidates for treatment with PD-1 and PD-L1.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and prognosis in melanoma patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Kreuz, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Vitor Kendi Tsuchiya Sano, Fernando Luiz Westphal Filho, Ana Laura Soares Silva, Francinny Alves Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CMR.0000000000001006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immunotherapy treatments that target programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma and currently represent the standard first-line treatment for this type of cancer. However, it is still not entirely clear which biomarkers are cost-effective, simple, and highly reliable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the predictive value of the baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) regarding disease progression and overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing high versus low NLR. We performed the meta-analysis using RStudio v4.4.2 software. A total of 20 studies and 2691 patients were included, all with diagnoses of melanoma. The majority of the individuals were male 2278 (84, 65%). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 5.0 to 44.4 and from 1.8 to 15.0 months, respectively. Compared with the high NLR ratio, the low exposure group achieved better rates of OS [hazard ratio (HR), 2.07; 95% CI, 1.73-2.48; P < 0.00001; I² = 47%]. Regarding PFS, there was a statistically significant difference between groups with tendencies toward the low NLR exposure group (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.39-1.81; P < 0.00001; I²=31%]. This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed significant lower OS in melanoma patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade who had elevated baseline NLR values. Furthermore, an increased PFS was observed in patients with a lower baseline NLR value. This study highlights NLR as an important prognostic biomarker for patients with metastatic melanoma who are candidates for treatment with PD-1 and PD-L1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melanoma Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melanoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000001006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000001006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以程序性细胞死亡受体-1(PD-1)或其配体(PD-L1)为靶点的免疫疗法彻底改变了转移性黑色素瘤的治疗方法,目前已成为此类癌症的标准一线治疗方法。然而,目前还不完全清楚哪些生物标记物具有成本效益、简便且高度可靠。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在分析基线中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对接受PD-1/PD-L1阻断治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者疾病进展和总生存期的预测价值。我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上搜索了比较高 NLR 与低 NLR 的研究。我们使用 RStudio v4.4.2 软件进行了荟萃分析。共纳入了 20 项研究和 2691 名患者,所有患者均确诊为黑色素瘤。大部分患者为男性,共 2278 例(84 例,65%)。中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 5.0 至 44.4 个月和 1.8 至 15.0 个月。与高 NLR 比率组相比,低暴露组的 OS 率更高[危险比 (HR),2.07;95% CI,1.73-2.48;P < 0.00001;I² = 47%]。在PFS方面,倾向于低NLR暴露组的组间差异有统计学意义(HR,1.59;95% CI,1.39-1.81;P<0.00001;I²=31%]。这项系统回顾和荟萃分析显示,接受PD-1/PD-L1阻断治疗的黑色素瘤患者中,基线NLR值升高者的OS显著降低。此外,基线 NLR 值较低的患者的 PFS 也有所增加。这项研究强调了NLR是适用于PD-1和PD-L1治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的重要预后生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and prognosis in melanoma patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Immunotherapy treatments that target programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma and currently represent the standard first-line treatment for this type of cancer. However, it is still not entirely clear which biomarkers are cost-effective, simple, and highly reliable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the predictive value of the baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) regarding disease progression and overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing high versus low NLR. We performed the meta-analysis using RStudio v4.4.2 software. A total of 20 studies and 2691 patients were included, all with diagnoses of melanoma. The majority of the individuals were male 2278 (84, 65%). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 5.0 to 44.4 and from 1.8 to 15.0 months, respectively. Compared with the high NLR ratio, the low exposure group achieved better rates of OS [hazard ratio (HR), 2.07; 95% CI, 1.73-2.48; P < 0.00001; I² = 47%]. Regarding PFS, there was a statistically significant difference between groups with tendencies toward the low NLR exposure group (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.39-1.81; P < 0.00001; I²=31%]. This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed significant lower OS in melanoma patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade who had elevated baseline NLR values. Furthermore, an increased PFS was observed in patients with a lower baseline NLR value. This study highlights NLR as an important prognostic biomarker for patients with metastatic melanoma who are candidates for treatment with PD-1 and PD-L1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Melanoma Research
Melanoma Research 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Melanoma Research is a well established international forum for the dissemination of new findings relating to melanoma. The aim of the Journal is to promote the level of informational exchange between those engaged in the field. Melanoma Research aims to encourage an informed and balanced view of experimental and clinical research and extend and stimulate communication and exchange of knowledge between investigators with differing areas of expertise. This will foster the development of translational research. The reporting of new clinical results and the effect and toxicity of new therapeutic agents and immunotherapy will be given emphasis by rapid publication of Short Communications. ​Thus, Melanoma Research seeks to present a coherent and up-to-date account of all aspects of investigations pertinent to melanoma. Consequently the scope of the Journal is broad, embracing the entire range of studies from fundamental and applied research in such subject areas as genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, photobiology, pathology, immunology, and advances in clinical oncology influencing the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信