世界卫生组织 II 级脑膜瘤次全切除术后辅助放射治疗的效果。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jordan C Petitt, Roger Murayi, Mohamed E El-Abtah, Arbaz Momin, Ahmed Halima, Tamia Potter, Peter Ahorukomeye, Jakub Jarmula, Mihika Thapliyal, Erin S Murphy, Samuel T Chao, John H Suh, Pablo F Recinos, Varun R Kshettry
{"title":"世界卫生组织 II 级脑膜瘤次全切除术后辅助放射治疗的效果。","authors":"Jordan C Petitt, Roger Murayi, Mohamed E El-Abtah, Arbaz Momin, Ahmed Halima, Tamia Potter, Peter Ahorukomeye, Jakub Jarmula, Mihika Thapliyal, Erin S Murphy, Samuel T Chao, John H Suh, Pablo F Recinos, Varun R Kshettry","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04878-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Existing literature on adjuvant radiation after subtotal resection (STR) of WHO II meningiomas is limited by heterogenous patient cohorts, combining adjuvant and salvage radiation, gross total resection (GTR) and STR, primary radiation treatment vs. re-treatment, or grade II and III meningiomas, all of which have different expected outcomes. Tumor control estimates in a large homogenous patient cohort are needed to accurately counsel patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients that had immediate post-operative imaging-confirmed residual WHO grade II meningioma followed by either adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 1996 and 2020 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (IMRT = 32; SRS = 7). Overall, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS was 81.1%, 61.2%, and 44.6%, respectively. Median follow-up time was 37 months. When comparing IMRT and SRS cohorts, baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups, but significantly larger residual tumor volumes were treated with IMRT (22.2 cm<sup>3</sup> vs. 6.3 cm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.004). PFS was not significantly different between IMRT and SRS at 3 years (81.1% vs. 80.0%) or 5 years (65.5% vs. 40%) (p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in radiation necrosis between groups (IMRT = 3/32 patients vs. SRS = 0/7 patients, p = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our homogenous patient cohort displayed acceptable control rates at 3 years using SRS or IMRT as adjuvant therapy. No significant difference in PFS or radiation necrosis was noted between patients treated with adjuvant IMRT versus SRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of adjuvant radiation treatment following subtotal resection of world health organization grade II meningiomas.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan C Petitt, Roger Murayi, Mohamed E El-Abtah, Arbaz Momin, Ahmed Halima, Tamia Potter, Peter Ahorukomeye, Jakub Jarmula, Mihika Thapliyal, Erin S Murphy, Samuel T Chao, John H Suh, Pablo F Recinos, Varun R Kshettry\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-024-04878-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Existing literature on adjuvant radiation after subtotal resection (STR) of WHO II meningiomas is limited by heterogenous patient cohorts, combining adjuvant and salvage radiation, gross total resection (GTR) and STR, primary radiation treatment vs. re-treatment, or grade II and III meningiomas, all of which have different expected outcomes. Tumor control estimates in a large homogenous patient cohort are needed to accurately counsel patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients that had immediate post-operative imaging-confirmed residual WHO grade II meningioma followed by either adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 1996 and 2020 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (IMRT = 32; SRS = 7). Overall, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS was 81.1%, 61.2%, and 44.6%, respectively. Median follow-up time was 37 months. When comparing IMRT and SRS cohorts, baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups, but significantly larger residual tumor volumes were treated with IMRT (22.2 cm<sup>3</sup> vs. 6.3 cm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.004). PFS was not significantly different between IMRT and SRS at 3 years (81.1% vs. 80.0%) or 5 years (65.5% vs. 40%) (p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in radiation necrosis between groups (IMRT = 3/32 patients vs. SRS = 0/7 patients, p = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our homogenous patient cohort displayed acceptable control rates at 3 years using SRS or IMRT as adjuvant therapy. No significant difference in PFS or radiation necrosis was noted between patients treated with adjuvant IMRT versus SRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04878-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04878-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于WHO II级脑膜瘤次全切除术(STR)后辅助放疗的现有文献受到不同患者队列的限制,这些患者队列将辅助放疗与挽救性放疗、全切除术(GTR)与STR、初次放疗与再次放疗或II级与III级脑膜瘤结合在一起,所有这些都有不同的预期结果。为了给患者提供准确的建议,需要对大型同质患者队列中的肿瘤控制情况进行评估:对 1996 年至 2020 年间术后立即接受影像学确诊的残留 WHO II 级脑膜瘤患者进行了回顾性研究,之后患者接受了强度调控放射治疗(IMRT)或立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)。采用卡普兰-梅耶生存分析和对数秩检验评估无进展生存期(PFS):结果:39 例患者符合纳入标准(IMRT = 32 例;SRS = 7 例)。总体而言,3年、5年和10年的无进展生存率分别为81.1%、61.2%和44.6%。中位随访时间为 37 个月。比较 IMRT 和 SRS 组群,两组的基线特征无显著差异,但 IMRT 治疗的残留肿瘤体积明显更大(22.2 cm3 vs. 6.3 cm3,p = 0.004)。IMRT和SRS在3年(81.1% vs. 80.0%)或5年(65.5% vs. 40%)的PFS无明显差异(p = 0.19)。组间放射坏死无明显差异(IMRT = 3/32 例患者 vs. SRS = 0/7 例患者,p = 0.32):结论:我们的同质患者队列在使用SRS或IMRT辅助治疗3年后显示出可接受的控制率。采用IMRT辅助治疗的患者与采用SRS辅助治疗的患者在PFS或放射性坏死方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of adjuvant radiation treatment following subtotal resection of world health organization grade II meningiomas.

Purpose: Existing literature on adjuvant radiation after subtotal resection (STR) of WHO II meningiomas is limited by heterogenous patient cohorts, combining adjuvant and salvage radiation, gross total resection (GTR) and STR, primary radiation treatment vs. re-treatment, or grade II and III meningiomas, all of which have different expected outcomes. Tumor control estimates in a large homogenous patient cohort are needed to accurately counsel patients.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients that had immediate post-operative imaging-confirmed residual WHO grade II meningioma followed by either adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 1996 and 2020 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (IMRT = 32; SRS = 7). Overall, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS was 81.1%, 61.2%, and 44.6%, respectively. Median follow-up time was 37 months. When comparing IMRT and SRS cohorts, baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups, but significantly larger residual tumor volumes were treated with IMRT (22.2 cm3 vs. 6.3 cm3, p = 0.004). PFS was not significantly different between IMRT and SRS at 3 years (81.1% vs. 80.0%) or 5 years (65.5% vs. 40%) (p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in radiation necrosis between groups (IMRT = 3/32 patients vs. SRS = 0/7 patients, p = 0.32).

Conclusion: Our homogenous patient cohort displayed acceptable control rates at 3 years using SRS or IMRT as adjuvant therapy. No significant difference in PFS or radiation necrosis was noted between patients treated with adjuvant IMRT versus SRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信