{"title":"A 群链球菌咽炎的分子诊断:比利时医疗保健背景下的临床和经济效益。","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Panahandeh, Reza Soleimani, Yasmine Nezzar, Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos, Benoît Kabamba-Mukadi, Alexandre Grimmelprez, Patricia Schatt","doi":"10.3390/jcm13216627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Group A Streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis is common, resulting in numerous ambulatory visits. Accurate diagnosis is challenging. This study evaluated the clinical utility, cost, and performance of a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for GAS detection, comparing it to a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and throat culture. Additionally, we assessed the diagnostic stewardship related to these testing methods to ensure appropriate antibiotic use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2022 and February 2023, 82 throat swabs were analyzed, with McIsaac clinical scores calculated for each. The Abbott ID NOW STREP A 2 NAAT and Sekisui Diagnostics' OSOM<sup>®</sup> STREP A RADT were performed, followed by bacterial culture. Diagnostic performance was compared using culture as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 82 samples, 28 (34.14%) tested positive for pathogenic germs, primarily <i>Streptococcus</i> pyogenes (92.85%). RADTs showed a sensitivity of 80.76% and a specificity of 100%, while NAATs demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.42%. Cost analysis indicated the need for reimbursement adjustments to optimize NAAT's economic benefits. Clinical data indicated that symptoms alone were insufficient for reliable diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed the superior sensitivity of Abbott's Strep A2 NAAT over RADT. Given the Belgian guidelines against routine antibiotic treatment for pharyngitis and considering local treatment recommendations and cost, implementing NAAT for GAS detection in Belgian laboratories is less beneficial. However, the role of NAAT in supporting antimicrobial stewardship by ensuring appropriate antibiotic use remains significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Diagnostics for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Clinical and Economic Benefits in the Belgian Healthcare Context.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hossein Panahandeh, Reza Soleimani, Yasmine Nezzar, Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos, Benoît Kabamba-Mukadi, Alexandre Grimmelprez, Patricia Schatt\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13216627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>(1) Background: Group A Streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis is common, resulting in numerous ambulatory visits. Accurate diagnosis is challenging. This study evaluated the clinical utility, cost, and performance of a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for GAS detection, comparing it to a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and throat culture. Additionally, we assessed the diagnostic stewardship related to these testing methods to ensure appropriate antibiotic use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2022 and February 2023, 82 throat swabs were analyzed, with McIsaac clinical scores calculated for each. The Abbott ID NOW STREP A 2 NAAT and Sekisui Diagnostics' OSOM<sup>®</sup> STREP A RADT were performed, followed by bacterial culture. Diagnostic performance was compared using culture as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 82 samples, 28 (34.14%) tested positive for pathogenic germs, primarily <i>Streptococcus</i> pyogenes (92.85%). RADTs showed a sensitivity of 80.76% and a specificity of 100%, while NAATs demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.42%. Cost analysis indicated the need for reimbursement adjustments to optimize NAAT's economic benefits. Clinical data indicated that symptoms alone were insufficient for reliable diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed the superior sensitivity of Abbott's Strep A2 NAAT over RADT. Given the Belgian guidelines against routine antibiotic treatment for pharyngitis and considering local treatment recommendations and cost, implementing NAAT for GAS detection in Belgian laboratories is less beneficial. However, the role of NAAT in supporting antimicrobial stewardship by ensuring appropriate antibiotic use remains significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216627\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
(1) 背景:A 组链球菌(GAS)咽炎很常见,导致大量门诊就诊。准确诊断具有挑战性。本研究评估了用于检测 GAS 的核酸扩增检验(NAAT)的临床实用性、成本和性能,并将其与快速抗原检测检验(RADT)和咽喉培养进行了比较。此外,我们还评估了与这些检测方法相关的诊断管理,以确保在临床实践中合理使用抗生素:方法:2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月期间,我们分析了 82 份咽拭子,并计算了每份咽拭子的 McIsaac 临床评分。进行雅培 ID NOW STREP A 2 NAAT 和积水诊断公司的 OSOM® STREP A RADT 检测,然后进行细菌培养。将细菌培养作为金标准来比较诊断效果:结果:在 82 份样本中,28 份(34.14%)的病原菌检测呈阳性,主要是化脓性链球菌(92.85%)。RADT 的灵敏度为 80.76%,特异性为 100%,而 NAAT 的灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 96.42%。成本分析表明,有必要调整报销额度,以优化 NAAT 的经济效益。临床数据表明,仅凭症状不足以做出可靠的诊断:这项研究证实,雅培 A2 型链球菌 NAAT 的灵敏度优于 RADT。鉴于比利时的指南反对对咽炎进行常规抗生素治疗,并考虑到当地的治疗建议和成本,在比利时实验室采用 NAAT 检测 GAS 的益处较小。不过,通过确保抗生素的合理使用,NAAT 在支持抗菌药物管理方面的作用仍然十分重要。
Molecular Diagnostics for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Clinical and Economic Benefits in the Belgian Healthcare Context.
(1) Background: Group A Streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis is common, resulting in numerous ambulatory visits. Accurate diagnosis is challenging. This study evaluated the clinical utility, cost, and performance of a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for GAS detection, comparing it to a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and throat culture. Additionally, we assessed the diagnostic stewardship related to these testing methods to ensure appropriate antibiotic use in clinical practice.
Methods: Between November 2022 and February 2023, 82 throat swabs were analyzed, with McIsaac clinical scores calculated for each. The Abbott ID NOW STREP A 2 NAAT and Sekisui Diagnostics' OSOM® STREP A RADT were performed, followed by bacterial culture. Diagnostic performance was compared using culture as the gold standard.
Results: Of the 82 samples, 28 (34.14%) tested positive for pathogenic germs, primarily Streptococcus pyogenes (92.85%). RADTs showed a sensitivity of 80.76% and a specificity of 100%, while NAATs demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.42%. Cost analysis indicated the need for reimbursement adjustments to optimize NAAT's economic benefits. Clinical data indicated that symptoms alone were insufficient for reliable diagnosis.
Conclusions: This study confirmed the superior sensitivity of Abbott's Strep A2 NAAT over RADT. Given the Belgian guidelines against routine antibiotic treatment for pharyngitis and considering local treatment recommendations and cost, implementing NAAT for GAS detection in Belgian laboratories is less beneficial. However, the role of NAAT in supporting antimicrobial stewardship by ensuring appropriate antibiotic use remains significant.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
Unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes.
There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.