评估脑深部刺激治疗难治性强迫症后的药物疗法和临床疗效:病例队列研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Joshua Knebel, Robert K McClure, M Lindsey Hedgepeth Kennedy
{"title":"评估脑深部刺激治疗难治性强迫症后的药物疗法和临床疗效:病例队列研究。","authors":"Joshua Knebel, Robert K McClure, M Lindsey Hedgepeth Kennedy","doi":"10.3390/jcm13216549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In the search for effective treatments for refractive obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), deep brain stimulation (DBS) serves as an alternative option for those with minimal response to pharmacotherapy. The rarity of reports regarding DBS use for OCD is attributed to the invasive nature of the procedure: placement of electrodes within targeted areas of the brain to provide neuromodulation. This treatment of last resort may decrease functional impairment and pharmacologic complications for a debilitating mental illness. This study compares the pharmacotherapy utilization and treatment outcomes of five treatment-refractory OCD patients after the placement of DBS with those of a matched cohort. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, single-center, case-cohort study reviewed the electronic medical records of five subjects treated with DBS for treatment-refractory OCD and compared them to a similar treatment-refractory cohort whose OCD was treated without the use of DBS. Control subjects were matched by age, sex, years since diagnosis, number of previous medication class trials, and additional clinical factors. Inclusion criteria were defined as those that are at least eighteen years of age, assigned a primary diagnosis of OCD per the ICD-10 classification, and received DBS treatment for refractory OCD. Exclusion criteria included comorbid psychotic disorders, unstable neurological or coagulation disorder(s), and/or an eating disorder diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the change in the number of psychotropic medications two years after implantation for the DBS cohort and two years after psychiatric decompensation for the comparator cohort. Secondary endpoints included: Y-BOCS (the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale) changes over time, duration quantity of psychotropic medication classes prescribed, and additional symptomology scale changes. <b>Results:</b> Patients receiving DBS were more likely to be on fewer medications and trialed fewer medications after treatment. One out of the five patients was found to be a responder in Y-BOCS scoring after DBS treatment. A reduction in anxiety and depression symptoms was also seen in the HAM-A and HAM-D scales for those that received DBS. <b>Conclusions</b>: A reduction in psychiatric medications trialed during therapy was observed, as well as varying reductions in OCD, anxiety, and depression symptomology following DBS. Results from this study indicate that DBS implantation may contribute to a reduction in polypharmacy while displaying DBS's potential impact on comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms. Given that the small sample size limits generalizability, additional prospective, randomized trials comparing the efficacy of DBS for OCD-specific symptomology and its overall impact on pharmacotherapy are needed in order to further establish the role of DBS as an accepted treatment option for OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Pharmacotherapy and Clinical Outcomes After Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Case-Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Knebel, Robert K McClure, M Lindsey Hedgepeth Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13216549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In the search for effective treatments for refractive obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), deep brain stimulation (DBS) serves as an alternative option for those with minimal response to pharmacotherapy. The rarity of reports regarding DBS use for OCD is attributed to the invasive nature of the procedure: placement of electrodes within targeted areas of the brain to provide neuromodulation. This treatment of last resort may decrease functional impairment and pharmacologic complications for a debilitating mental illness. This study compares the pharmacotherapy utilization and treatment outcomes of five treatment-refractory OCD patients after the placement of DBS with those of a matched cohort. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, single-center, case-cohort study reviewed the electronic medical records of five subjects treated with DBS for treatment-refractory OCD and compared them to a similar treatment-refractory cohort whose OCD was treated without the use of DBS. Control subjects were matched by age, sex, years since diagnosis, number of previous medication class trials, and additional clinical factors. Inclusion criteria were defined as those that are at least eighteen years of age, assigned a primary diagnosis of OCD per the ICD-10 classification, and received DBS treatment for refractory OCD. Exclusion criteria included comorbid psychotic disorders, unstable neurological or coagulation disorder(s), and/or an eating disorder diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the change in the number of psychotropic medications two years after implantation for the DBS cohort and two years after psychiatric decompensation for the comparator cohort. Secondary endpoints included: Y-BOCS (the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale) changes over time, duration quantity of psychotropic medication classes prescribed, and additional symptomology scale changes. <b>Results:</b> Patients receiving DBS were more likely to be on fewer medications and trialed fewer medications after treatment. One out of the five patients was found to be a responder in Y-BOCS scoring after DBS treatment. A reduction in anxiety and depression symptoms was also seen in the HAM-A and HAM-D scales for those that received DBS. <b>Conclusions</b>: A reduction in psychiatric medications trialed during therapy was observed, as well as varying reductions in OCD, anxiety, and depression symptomology following DBS. Results from this study indicate that DBS implantation may contribute to a reduction in polypharmacy while displaying DBS's potential impact on comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms. Given that the small sample size limits generalizability, additional prospective, randomized trials comparing the efficacy of DBS for OCD-specific symptomology and its overall impact on pharmacotherapy are needed in order to further establish the role of DBS as an accepted treatment option for OCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546672/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216549\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在寻求有效治疗屈光强迫症(OCD)的过程中,脑深部刺激(DBS)是药物治疗效果不佳者的另一种选择。有关使用脑深部刺激治疗强迫症的报道很少,这是因为该疗法具有创伤性:在大脑的目标区域放置电极以提供神经调节。这种不得已而为之的治疗方法可以减少功能损害和药物治疗对精神疾病的并发症。本研究比较了五名难治性强迫症患者在植入 DBS 后的药物治疗使用情况和治疗效果,以及与之匹配的队列中的药物治疗使用情况和治疗效果。研究方法这项回顾性、单中心、病例队列研究回顾了五名接受 DBS 治疗的难治性强迫症患者的电子病历,并将其与未接受 DBS 治疗的类似难治性强迫症队列进行了比较。对照组受试者的年龄、性别、确诊年限、既往药物类试验次数以及其他临床因素均匹配。纳入标准是指至少年满 18 周岁、根据 ICD-10 分类被确诊为强迫症、接受过 DBS 治疗的难治性强迫症患者。排除标准包括合并精神病性障碍、不稳定的神经或凝血障碍和/或饮食紊乱诊断。主要终点是 DBS 组群植入两年后精神药物数量的变化,而对比组群则是精神失常两年后精神药物数量的变化。次要终点包括Y-BOCS(雅礼-布朗强迫症量表)随时间的变化、处方精神药物种类的持续时间和其他症状量表的变化。研究结果接受 DBS 治疗的患者更有可能减少用药次数,治疗后试用的药物也更少。在接受 DBS 治疗后,发现五名患者中有一人对 Y-BOCS 评分有反应。接受 DBS 治疗的患者在 HAM-A 和 HAM-D 量表中的焦虑和抑郁症状也有所减轻。结论在接受 DBS 治疗后,治疗期间试用的精神科药物有所减少,强迫症、焦虑症和抑郁症状也有不同程度的减轻。这项研究的结果表明,植入 DBS 有助于减少多重药物治疗,同时显示出 DBS 对合并焦虑和抑郁症状的潜在影响。鉴于样本量较小限制了其推广性,因此需要进行更多的前瞻性随机试验,比较 DBS 对强迫症特异性症状的疗效及其对药物治疗的总体影响,以进一步确定 DBS 作为强迫症公认治疗方案的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Pharmacotherapy and Clinical Outcomes After Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Case-Cohort Study.

Background: In the search for effective treatments for refractive obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), deep brain stimulation (DBS) serves as an alternative option for those with minimal response to pharmacotherapy. The rarity of reports regarding DBS use for OCD is attributed to the invasive nature of the procedure: placement of electrodes within targeted areas of the brain to provide neuromodulation. This treatment of last resort may decrease functional impairment and pharmacologic complications for a debilitating mental illness. This study compares the pharmacotherapy utilization and treatment outcomes of five treatment-refractory OCD patients after the placement of DBS with those of a matched cohort. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, case-cohort study reviewed the electronic medical records of five subjects treated with DBS for treatment-refractory OCD and compared them to a similar treatment-refractory cohort whose OCD was treated without the use of DBS. Control subjects were matched by age, sex, years since diagnosis, number of previous medication class trials, and additional clinical factors. Inclusion criteria were defined as those that are at least eighteen years of age, assigned a primary diagnosis of OCD per the ICD-10 classification, and received DBS treatment for refractory OCD. Exclusion criteria included comorbid psychotic disorders, unstable neurological or coagulation disorder(s), and/or an eating disorder diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the change in the number of psychotropic medications two years after implantation for the DBS cohort and two years after psychiatric decompensation for the comparator cohort. Secondary endpoints included: Y-BOCS (the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale) changes over time, duration quantity of psychotropic medication classes prescribed, and additional symptomology scale changes. Results: Patients receiving DBS were more likely to be on fewer medications and trialed fewer medications after treatment. One out of the five patients was found to be a responder in Y-BOCS scoring after DBS treatment. A reduction in anxiety and depression symptoms was also seen in the HAM-A and HAM-D scales for those that received DBS. Conclusions: A reduction in psychiatric medications trialed during therapy was observed, as well as varying reductions in OCD, anxiety, and depression symptomology following DBS. Results from this study indicate that DBS implantation may contribute to a reduction in polypharmacy while displaying DBS's potential impact on comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms. Given that the small sample size limits generalizability, additional prospective, randomized trials comparing the efficacy of DBS for OCD-specific symptomology and its overall impact on pharmacotherapy are needed in order to further establish the role of DBS as an accepted treatment option for OCD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信