对重症监护中机械通气患者断气决策支持的评估:一项报告临床和生理结果的前瞻性研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Marcela P Vizcaychipi, Dan S Karbing, Laura Martins, Amandeep Gupta, Jeronimo Moreno-Cuesta, Manu Naik, Ingeborg Welters, Suveer Singh, Georgina Randell, Leyla Osman, Stephen E Rees
{"title":"对重症监护中机械通气患者断气决策支持的评估:一项报告临床和生理结果的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Marcela P Vizcaychipi, Dan S Karbing, Laura Martins, Amandeep Gupta, Jeronimo Moreno-Cuesta, Manu Naik, Ingeborg Welters, Suveer Singh, Georgina Randell, Leyla Osman, Stephen E Rees","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01231-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the clinical and physiological response to use of the BEACON Caresystem, a bedside open-loop decision support system providing advice to guide clinicians when weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation. Multicenter prospective study conducted in five adult intensive care units in the UK. Following screening and assent, intubated patients mechanically ventilated for > 24 h were randomized to intervention or usual care. Intervention consisted of application of the BEACON Caresystem's advice on tidal volume/inspiratory pressure, inspired oxygen, respiratory rate and PEEP. Usual care was defined as local clinical practice. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes quantified prolonged intubation and survival; adverse events; ventilator settings and physiological state; time spent in ventilator modes; links to other therapy; the frequency of advice utilization and time spent outside normal physiological limits. The study was terminated early with a total of 112 patients included. Fifty-four were randomised to the intervention arm and fifty-eight to usual care. The study was underpowered and no significant differences were seen in duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.773), prolonged intubation or survival. Intervention arm patients had lower rates of adverse events (p = 0.016), including fewer hypoxaemic events (p = 0.008) and lower values of PEEP (p = 0.030) and tidal volume (p = 0.042). Values of peak inspiratory pressure and pressure support were reduced but at the boarder of statistical significance (p = 0.104, p = 0.093, respectively). No differences were seen for time in ventilator mode or other therapy. Advice presented by the decision support system was applied at the beside an average of 88% of occasions, with a significantly increased number of changes only in inspired oxygen fraction. No significant differences were seen in time spent outside physiological limits. This study investigated the use of the BEACON Caresystem, an open loop clinical decision support system providing advice on ventilator settings. It was terminated early, with no significant difference shown in duration of mechanical ventilation, the primary outcome. Application of advice indicated potential for fewer adverse events and improved physiological status. (Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT03249623. Registered 22nd June 2017).</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of decision support to wean patients from mechanical ventilation in intensive care: a prospective study reporting clinical and physiological outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Marcela P Vizcaychipi, Dan S Karbing, Laura Martins, Amandeep Gupta, Jeronimo Moreno-Cuesta, Manu Naik, Ingeborg Welters, Suveer Singh, Georgina Randell, Leyla Osman, Stephen E Rees\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-024-01231-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the clinical and physiological response to use of the BEACON Caresystem, a bedside open-loop decision support system providing advice to guide clinicians when weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation. Multicenter prospective study conducted in five adult intensive care units in the UK. Following screening and assent, intubated patients mechanically ventilated for > 24 h were randomized to intervention or usual care. Intervention consisted of application of the BEACON Caresystem's advice on tidal volume/inspiratory pressure, inspired oxygen, respiratory rate and PEEP. Usual care was defined as local clinical practice. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes quantified prolonged intubation and survival; adverse events; ventilator settings and physiological state; time spent in ventilator modes; links to other therapy; the frequency of advice utilization and time spent outside normal physiological limits. The study was terminated early with a total of 112 patients included. Fifty-four were randomised to the intervention arm and fifty-eight to usual care. The study was underpowered and no significant differences were seen in duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.773), prolonged intubation or survival. Intervention arm patients had lower rates of adverse events (p = 0.016), including fewer hypoxaemic events (p = 0.008) and lower values of PEEP (p = 0.030) and tidal volume (p = 0.042). Values of peak inspiratory pressure and pressure support were reduced but at the boarder of statistical significance (p = 0.104, p = 0.093, respectively). No differences were seen for time in ventilator mode or other therapy. Advice presented by the decision support system was applied at the beside an average of 88% of occasions, with a significantly increased number of changes only in inspired oxygen fraction. No significant differences were seen in time spent outside physiological limits. This study investigated the use of the BEACON Caresystem, an open loop clinical decision support system providing advice on ventilator settings. It was terminated early, with no significant difference shown in duration of mechanical ventilation, the primary outcome. Application of advice indicated potential for fewer adverse events and improved physiological status. (Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT03249623. Registered 22nd June 2017).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01231-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01231-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

BEACON Caresystem 是一种床旁开环决策支持系统,可为临床医生在对患者进行有创机械通气断流时提供指导建议,本研究对使用 BEACON Caresystem 的临床和生理反应进行了调查。这项多中心前瞻性研究在英国的五个成人重症监护病房进行。经过筛选和同意后,对插管机械通气时间超过 24 小时的患者随机进行干预或常规护理。干预措施包括应用 BEACON Caresystem 建议的潮气量/吸气压力、吸入氧气、呼吸频率和 PEEP。常规护理是指当地的临床实践。主要结果是机械通气持续时间。次要结果量化了插管时间延长和存活率、不良事件、呼吸机设置和生理状态、呼吸机模式所花费的时间、与其他疗法的联系、建议使用频率以及超出正常生理极限的时间。研究提前结束,共纳入 112 名患者。其中 54 人被随机分配到干预组,58 人被随机分配到常规护理组。由于研究力量不足,因此在机械通气时间(p = 0.773)、插管时间延长或存活率方面未发现明显差异。干预组患者的不良事件发生率较低(p = 0.016),包括低氧血症事件较少(p = 0.008)、PEEP 值较低(p = 0.030)和潮气量较低(p = 0.042)。吸气峰值压力和压力支持值有所降低,但在统计学意义上处于边缘(分别为 p = 0.104 和 p = 0.093)。呼吸机模式和其他疗法的时间没有差异。决策支持系统提供的建议平均在 88% 的情况下得到了应用,仅在改变吸入氧分数的次数上有显著增加。在超出生理极限的时间上没有明显差异。这项研究调查了 BEACON Caresystem 的使用情况,这是一个开环临床决策支持系统,可提供呼吸机设置建议。该系统提前结束了研究,但在主要结果--机械通气的持续时间上并无明显差异。建议的应用表明有可能减少不良事件并改善生理状态。(试验注册在 ClinicalTrials.gov 的 NCT03249623 下。注册日期为 2017 年 6 月 22 日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of decision support to wean patients from mechanical ventilation in intensive care: a prospective study reporting clinical and physiological outcomes.

This study investigated the clinical and physiological response to use of the BEACON Caresystem, a bedside open-loop decision support system providing advice to guide clinicians when weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation. Multicenter prospective study conducted in five adult intensive care units in the UK. Following screening and assent, intubated patients mechanically ventilated for > 24 h were randomized to intervention or usual care. Intervention consisted of application of the BEACON Caresystem's advice on tidal volume/inspiratory pressure, inspired oxygen, respiratory rate and PEEP. Usual care was defined as local clinical practice. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes quantified prolonged intubation and survival; adverse events; ventilator settings and physiological state; time spent in ventilator modes; links to other therapy; the frequency of advice utilization and time spent outside normal physiological limits. The study was terminated early with a total of 112 patients included. Fifty-four were randomised to the intervention arm and fifty-eight to usual care. The study was underpowered and no significant differences were seen in duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.773), prolonged intubation or survival. Intervention arm patients had lower rates of adverse events (p = 0.016), including fewer hypoxaemic events (p = 0.008) and lower values of PEEP (p = 0.030) and tidal volume (p = 0.042). Values of peak inspiratory pressure and pressure support were reduced but at the boarder of statistical significance (p = 0.104, p = 0.093, respectively). No differences were seen for time in ventilator mode or other therapy. Advice presented by the decision support system was applied at the beside an average of 88% of occasions, with a significantly increased number of changes only in inspired oxygen fraction. No significant differences were seen in time spent outside physiological limits. This study investigated the use of the BEACON Caresystem, an open loop clinical decision support system providing advice on ventilator settings. It was terminated early, with no significant difference shown in duration of mechanical ventilation, the primary outcome. Application of advice indicated potential for fewer adverse events and improved physiological status. (Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT03249623. Registered 22nd June 2017).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信