Shiqi Liang, Yirong He, Xinrong Chen, Menghang Wu, Ka Li
{"title":"不同浓度的洗必泰在口腔护理实践中对消泡剂的影响:系统综述与网络元分析》。","authors":"Shiqi Liang, Yirong He, Xinrong Chen, Menghang Wu, Ka Li","doi":"10.1111/idh.12878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the anti-plaque effects and adverse effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine (CHX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, OVID Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of different concentrations of CHX in healthy populations. Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed to summarise the evidence, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Cohen's d standardised mean differences were calculated as the measure of effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight RCTs involving 2011 participants and six concentrations of CHX (0.2%, 0.12%, 0.1%, 0.3%, 1% and 0.06%) were included. The anti-plaque effects of CHX at all concentrations were compared with placebo. Moderate to very low certainty evidence established 0.2% CHX as the most effective on anti-plaque. 0.12% and 0.1% CHX also showed significant anti-plaque effects. However, the ranking probabilities showed that the adverse effects of 0.12% and 0.1% CHX were < 0.2% CHX.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with placebo, 0.2%, 0.12% and 0.1% CHX had significant anti-plaque effects, with moderate to very low certainty evidence that 0.2% CHX was most effective on anti-plaque. However, 0.2% CHX had larger adverse effects than 0.12% and 0.1% CHX.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: Number CRD: 42022327083.</p>","PeriodicalId":13791,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dental hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Concentrations of Chlorhexidine on Anti-Plaque in Oral Care Practice: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shiqi Liang, Yirong He, Xinrong Chen, Menghang Wu, Ka Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/idh.12878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the anti-plaque effects and adverse effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine (CHX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, OVID Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of different concentrations of CHX in healthy populations. Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed to summarise the evidence, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Cohen's d standardised mean differences were calculated as the measure of effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight RCTs involving 2011 participants and six concentrations of CHX (0.2%, 0.12%, 0.1%, 0.3%, 1% and 0.06%) were included. The anti-plaque effects of CHX at all concentrations were compared with placebo. Moderate to very low certainty evidence established 0.2% CHX as the most effective on anti-plaque. 0.12% and 0.1% CHX also showed significant anti-plaque effects. However, the ranking probabilities showed that the adverse effects of 0.12% and 0.1% CHX were < 0.2% CHX.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with placebo, 0.2%, 0.12% and 0.1% CHX had significant anti-plaque effects, with moderate to very low certainty evidence that 0.2% CHX was most effective on anti-plaque. However, 0.2% CHX had larger adverse effects than 0.12% and 0.1% CHX.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: Number CRD: 42022327083.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of dental hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of dental hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12878\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Different Concentrations of Chlorhexidine on Anti-Plaque in Oral Care Practice: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Objectives: The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the anti-plaque effects and adverse effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine (CHX).
Methods: PubMed, OVID Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of different concentrations of CHX in healthy populations. Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed to summarise the evidence, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Cohen's d standardised mean differences were calculated as the measure of effect size.
Results: Thirty-eight RCTs involving 2011 participants and six concentrations of CHX (0.2%, 0.12%, 0.1%, 0.3%, 1% and 0.06%) were included. The anti-plaque effects of CHX at all concentrations were compared with placebo. Moderate to very low certainty evidence established 0.2% CHX as the most effective on anti-plaque. 0.12% and 0.1% CHX also showed significant anti-plaque effects. However, the ranking probabilities showed that the adverse effects of 0.12% and 0.1% CHX were < 0.2% CHX.
Conclusions: Compared with placebo, 0.2%, 0.12% and 0.1% CHX had significant anti-plaque effects, with moderate to very low certainty evidence that 0.2% CHX was most effective on anti-plaque. However, 0.2% CHX had larger adverse effects than 0.12% and 0.1% CHX.
Trial registration: PROSPERO: Number CRD: 42022327083.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Dental Hygiene is the official scientific peer-reviewed journal of the International Federation of Dental Hygienists (IFDH). The journal brings the latest scientific news, high quality commissioned reviews as well as clinical, professional and educational developmental and legislative news to the profession world-wide. Thus, it acts as a forum for exchange of relevant information and enhancement of the profession with the purpose of promoting oral health for patients and communities.
The aim of the International Journal of Dental Hygiene is to provide a forum for exchange of scientific knowledge in the field of oral health and dental hygiene. A further aim is to support and facilitate the application of new knowledge into clinical practice. The journal welcomes original research, reviews and case reports as well as clinical, professional, educational and legislative news to the profession world-wide.