日本一家三级护理医院内及周边设施间的 MRSA、ESBL 大肠杆菌和艰难梭菌传播:基于 PCR 的开放读码框分型分子流行病学研究。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hiroki Saito, Satoshi Miike, Tatsuya Ohno, Momoko Anzai, Fumimasa Kasai, Akiko Hosoyama, Tomomi Takakura, Yosuke Tanaka, Shigeki Fujitani
{"title":"日本一家三级护理医院内及周边设施间的 MRSA、ESBL 大肠杆菌和艰难梭菌传播:基于 PCR 的开放读码框分型分子流行病学研究。","authors":"Hiroki Saito, Satoshi Miike, Tatsuya Ohno, Momoko Anzai, Fumimasa Kasai, Akiko Hosoyama, Tomomi Takakura, Yosuke Tanaka, Shigeki Fujitani","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the regional impact of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRDOs) and <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> (<i>C. difficile</i>) among a tertiary care hospital and surrounding facilities including long-term care facilities (LTCFs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital from July 2019 to July 2021 were recruited if their clinically collected cultures grew the following pathogens: Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA), Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> with difficult-to-treat resistance, Carbapenem-resistant Enterobaterales, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and <i>C. difficile</i>. Patient characteristics including admission and discharge pathway were collected. For the isolates of MRSA, ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>), and <i>C. difficile</i>, a molecular epidemiological analysis was conducted, utilizing the PCR-based Open-Reading Frame Typing (POT) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred-five patients were identified with a total of 332 culture specimens of the target pathogens. The top three were 132 MRSA isolates (43.3%, out of 305), 97 ESBL <i>E. coli</i> (31.8%), and 32 ESBL Enterobacterales (non-<i>E. coli</i>) (10.5%). The target pathogens were more detectable within 3 days among patients admitted from LTCFs or other hospitals than those admitted from home (Odds Ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.8-7.6, p-value < 0.001). The molecular epidemiological analysis suggested the transmissions of MRSA, ESBL <i>E. coli</i> and <i>C. difficile</i> occurred 52 out of 111 patients within the in-hospital environment, and 7 out of 128 within the prehospital environment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDROs/<i>C. difficile</i> transmission is prevalent within a tertiary care hospital and further complicated by its inter-facility transmission across surrounding LTCFs and hospitals in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transmission of MRSA, ESBL <i>E. coli</i>, and <i>C. difficile</i> within a tertiary care hospital and across surrounding facilities in Japan: a molecular epidemiological study with the PCR-based Open-reading frame typing.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Saito, Satoshi Miike, Tatsuya Ohno, Momoko Anzai, Fumimasa Kasai, Akiko Hosoyama, Tomomi Takakura, Yosuke Tanaka, Shigeki Fujitani\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2024.178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the regional impact of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRDOs) and <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> (<i>C. difficile</i>) among a tertiary care hospital and surrounding facilities including long-term care facilities (LTCFs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital from July 2019 to July 2021 were recruited if their clinically collected cultures grew the following pathogens: Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA), Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> with difficult-to-treat resistance, Carbapenem-resistant Enterobaterales, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and <i>C. difficile</i>. Patient characteristics including admission and discharge pathway were collected. For the isolates of MRSA, ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>), and <i>C. difficile</i>, a molecular epidemiological analysis was conducted, utilizing the PCR-based Open-Reading Frame Typing (POT) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred-five patients were identified with a total of 332 culture specimens of the target pathogens. The top three were 132 MRSA isolates (43.3%, out of 305), 97 ESBL <i>E. coli</i> (31.8%), and 32 ESBL Enterobacterales (non-<i>E. coli</i>) (10.5%). The target pathogens were more detectable within 3 days among patients admitted from LTCFs or other hospitals than those admitted from home (Odds Ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.8-7.6, p-value < 0.001). The molecular epidemiological analysis suggested the transmissions of MRSA, ESBL <i>E. coli</i> and <i>C. difficile</i> occurred 52 out of 111 patients within the in-hospital environment, and 7 out of 128 within the prehospital environment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDROs/<i>C. difficile</i> transmission is prevalent within a tertiary care hospital and further complicated by its inter-facility transmission across surrounding LTCFs and hospitals in Japan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.178\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定耐多药生物(MRDOs)和艰难梭菌(C. difficile)在一家三级护理医院及周边设施(包括长期护理设施(LTCFs))中传播的区域影响:设计:回顾性队列研究:2019年7月至2021年7月期间入住一家三级护理医院的患者,如果其临床培养物中生长出以下病原体,则将其纳入研究:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肠杆菌科细菌、难治性铜绿假单胞菌、耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌、耐万古霉素肠杆菌科细菌和艰难梭菌。收集的患者特征包括入院和出院路径。对于 MRSA、产 ESBL 大肠杆菌(E. coli)和艰难梭菌的分离物,利用基于 PCR 的开放读框分型法(POT)进行了分子流行病学分析:结果:共对 35 名患者的 332 份培养标本进行了目标病原体鉴定。前三名分别是 132 例 MRSA 分离物(占 305 例中的 43.3%)、97 例 ESBL 大肠杆菌(占 31.8%)和 32 例 ESBL 肠杆菌(非大肠杆菌)(占 10.5%)。与从家中入院的患者相比,从长期护理设施或其他医院入院的患者更容易在 3 天内检测到目标病原体(Odds Ratio 4.6,95% 置信区间 2.8-7.6,P 值 <0.001)。分子流行病学分析表明,在院内环境中,111名患者中有52人感染了MRSA、ESBL大肠杆菌和艰难梭菌;在院前环境中,128名患者中有7人感染了MRSA、ESBL大肠杆菌和艰难梭菌:结论:MDROs/艰难梭菌的传播在一家三级护理医院内非常普遍,而在日本,其在周边的 LTCF 和医院之间的传播使情况更加复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transmission of MRSA, ESBL E. coli, and C. difficile within a tertiary care hospital and across surrounding facilities in Japan: a molecular epidemiological study with the PCR-based Open-reading frame typing.

Objective: To determine the regional impact of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRDOs) and Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) among a tertiary care hospital and surrounding facilities including long-term care facilities (LTCFs).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital from July 2019 to July 2021 were recruited if their clinically collected cultures grew the following pathogens: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance, Carbapenem-resistant Enterobaterales, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and C. difficile. Patient characteristics including admission and discharge pathway were collected. For the isolates of MRSA, ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli), and C. difficile, a molecular epidemiological analysis was conducted, utilizing the PCR-based Open-Reading Frame Typing (POT) method.

Results: Three hundred-five patients were identified with a total of 332 culture specimens of the target pathogens. The top three were 132 MRSA isolates (43.3%, out of 305), 97 ESBL E. coli (31.8%), and 32 ESBL Enterobacterales (non-E. coli) (10.5%). The target pathogens were more detectable within 3 days among patients admitted from LTCFs or other hospitals than those admitted from home (Odds Ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.8-7.6, p-value < 0.001). The molecular epidemiological analysis suggested the transmissions of MRSA, ESBL E. coli and C. difficile occurred 52 out of 111 patients within the in-hospital environment, and 7 out of 128 within the prehospital environment, respectively.

Conclusions: MDROs/C. difficile transmission is prevalent within a tertiary care hospital and further complicated by its inter-facility transmission across surrounding LTCFs and hospitals in Japan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信