{"title":"对接受多日化疗患者进行多日止吐治疗的有效性和安全性:日本临床肿瘤学会《止吐临床实践指南2023》的系统回顾。","authors":"Kazuhisa Nakashima, Saki Harashima, Rena Kaneko, Ryuhei Tanaka, Masakazu Abe, Makoto Wada, Keiko Iino, Tatsuo Akechi, Hirotoshi Iihara, Chiyo K Imamura, Ayako Okuyama, Keiko Ozawa, Yong-Il Kim, Eriko Satomi, Masayuki Takeda, Takako Eguchi Nakajima, Naoki Nakamura, Junichi Nishimura, Mayumi Noda, Kazumi Hayashi, Takahiro Higashi, Narikazu Boku, Koji Matsumoto, Yoko Matsumoto, Kenji Okita, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Kenjiro Aogi, Hidenori Sasaki","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02652-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A standardized multi-day antiemetic regimen for multi-day chemotherapy remains elusive. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic regimens in patients undergoing multi-day intravenous chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases for relevant studies published from January 1990 to December 2020. We included studies comparing multi-day and single-day antiemetic regimens for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No studies directly comparing multi-day versus single-day antiemetic regimens were found. Despite expanding control group criteria beyond \"single-day antiemetic therapy\" limited high-quality studies and variations in cancer types, chemotherapy regimens, and antiemetic treatments precluded meta-analysis. Among the included studies, some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on complete response and vomiting rates. Two studies comparing two- and three-drug combinations reported higher complete response and no-vomiting rates with the three-drug regimen. Limited RCTs explored \"nausea control\" and \"cost,\" and assessing \"adverse events\" proved challenging due to inconsistent reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research on multi-day antiemetic therapy is limited, necessitating further investigation. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that three-drug combination therapy, including aprepitant, may offer superior antiemetic efficacy compared to two-drug regimens. Multi-day antiemetic therapy is strongly recommended during multi-day intravenous administration of cytotoxic anticancer drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic treatment for patients undergoing multi-day chemotherapy: a systematic review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhisa Nakashima, Saki Harashima, Rena Kaneko, Ryuhei Tanaka, Masakazu Abe, Makoto Wada, Keiko Iino, Tatsuo Akechi, Hirotoshi Iihara, Chiyo K Imamura, Ayako Okuyama, Keiko Ozawa, Yong-Il Kim, Eriko Satomi, Masayuki Takeda, Takako Eguchi Nakajima, Naoki Nakamura, Junichi Nishimura, Mayumi Noda, Kazumi Hayashi, Takahiro Higashi, Narikazu Boku, Koji Matsumoto, Yoko Matsumoto, Kenji Okita, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Kenjiro Aogi, Hidenori Sasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-024-02652-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A standardized multi-day antiemetic regimen for multi-day chemotherapy remains elusive. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic regimens in patients undergoing multi-day intravenous chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases for relevant studies published from January 1990 to December 2020. We included studies comparing multi-day and single-day antiemetic regimens for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No studies directly comparing multi-day versus single-day antiemetic regimens were found. Despite expanding control group criteria beyond \\\"single-day antiemetic therapy\\\" limited high-quality studies and variations in cancer types, chemotherapy regimens, and antiemetic treatments precluded meta-analysis. Among the included studies, some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on complete response and vomiting rates. Two studies comparing two- and three-drug combinations reported higher complete response and no-vomiting rates with the three-drug regimen. Limited RCTs explored \\\"nausea control\\\" and \\\"cost,\\\" and assessing \\\"adverse events\\\" proved challenging due to inconsistent reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research on multi-day antiemetic therapy is limited, necessitating further investigation. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that three-drug combination therapy, including aprepitant, may offer superior antiemetic efficacy compared to two-drug regimens. Multi-day antiemetic therapy is strongly recommended during multi-day intravenous administration of cytotoxic anticancer drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02652-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02652-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic treatment for patients undergoing multi-day chemotherapy: a systematic review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
Background: A standardized multi-day antiemetic regimen for multi-day chemotherapy remains elusive. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic regimens in patients undergoing multi-day intravenous chemotherapy.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases for relevant studies published from January 1990 to December 2020. We included studies comparing multi-day and single-day antiemetic regimens for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Results: No studies directly comparing multi-day versus single-day antiemetic regimens were found. Despite expanding control group criteria beyond "single-day antiemetic therapy" limited high-quality studies and variations in cancer types, chemotherapy regimens, and antiemetic treatments precluded meta-analysis. Among the included studies, some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on complete response and vomiting rates. Two studies comparing two- and three-drug combinations reported higher complete response and no-vomiting rates with the three-drug regimen. Limited RCTs explored "nausea control" and "cost," and assessing "adverse events" proved challenging due to inconsistent reporting.
Conclusion: The research on multi-day antiemetic therapy is limited, necessitating further investigation. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that three-drug combination therapy, including aprepitant, may offer superior antiemetic efficacy compared to two-drug regimens. Multi-day antiemetic therapy is strongly recommended during multi-day intravenous administration of cytotoxic anticancer drugs.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.