Young-Sun Kim, Hyeri Shin, Minah Lee, Nam-Hwa Kim, Eui-Hyun Kim, Dukyoung Jung, Minra Choi, Kyeong-Hee Choi
{"title":"韩国长期护理人员对智能护理床技术接受程度的变化。","authors":"Young-Sun Kim, Hyeri Shin, Minah Lee, Nam-Hwa Kim, Eui-Hyun Kim, Dukyoung Jung, Minra Choi, Kyeong-Hee Choi","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12212195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the changing perceptions of Korean care workers regarding a robotic bed designed to assist with repositioning and prevent pressure ulcers. With the primary aim of assessing the technology acceptance among care workers using the robotic bed to solve the problem of a shortage of care workers in Korea, we sought to examine the possibility of applying care robots in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 long-term care workers participated in the experiment, and their attitudes were measured before and after using the robot. Frequency analysis and paired <i>t</i>-tests were conducted using Stata 17 to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show significant changes in the perceived ease of use (PEOU), facilitating conditions (FCs), and gerontology anxiety (GA), with the PEOU increasing by 19.87%, FC increasing by 20.63%, and GA decreasing by 17.2%. However, there was no significant change in the perceived usefulness (PU) and intention to use (IU).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results showing that the perception of technology acceptance changed significantly mean that the use of the care robot means that there is a high possibility of positive perceptions in Korean care settings when care robots are distributed in the field in the future, considering that the experimental environment was limited due to the early stage of development of care robots. This study highlights the need for practical demonstrations and thorough training to improve technology acceptance among care workers before the application of care technology in the long-term care environment in South Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Technology Acceptance of Smart Care Beds Among Long-Term Care Workers in Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Young-Sun Kim, Hyeri Shin, Minah Lee, Nam-Hwa Kim, Eui-Hyun Kim, Dukyoung Jung, Minra Choi, Kyeong-Hee Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare12212195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the changing perceptions of Korean care workers regarding a robotic bed designed to assist with repositioning and prevent pressure ulcers. With the primary aim of assessing the technology acceptance among care workers using the robotic bed to solve the problem of a shortage of care workers in Korea, we sought to examine the possibility of applying care robots in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 long-term care workers participated in the experiment, and their attitudes were measured before and after using the robot. Frequency analysis and paired <i>t</i>-tests were conducted using Stata 17 to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show significant changes in the perceived ease of use (PEOU), facilitating conditions (FCs), and gerontology anxiety (GA), with the PEOU increasing by 19.87%, FC increasing by 20.63%, and GA decreasing by 17.2%. However, there was no significant change in the perceived usefulness (PU) and intention to use (IU).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results showing that the perception of technology acceptance changed significantly mean that the use of the care robot means that there is a high possibility of positive perceptions in Korean care settings when care robots are distributed in the field in the future, considering that the experimental environment was limited due to the early stage of development of care robots. This study highlights the need for practical demonstrations and thorough training to improve technology acceptance among care workers before the application of care technology in the long-term care environment in South Korea.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究调查了韩国护理人员对机器人床的看法的变化,机器人床的设计目的是协助重新定位和预防压疮。我们的主要目的是评估护理人员对使用机器人床的技术接受程度,以解决韩国护理人员短缺的问题,我们试图研究在该领域应用护理机器人的可能性:方法:共有 20 名长期护理人员参加了实验,并在使用机器人前后对他们的态度进行了测量。使用 Stata 17 对数据进行了频数分析和配对 t 检验:结果显示,感知易用性(PEOU)、便利条件(FCs)和老年焦虑(GA)均有明显变化,PEOU 增加了 19.87%,FC 增加了 20.63%,GA 减少了 17.2%。然而,感知有用性(PU)和使用意向(IU)没有明显变化:研究结果表明,技术接受度的感知发生了显著变化,这意味着护理机器人的使用意味着,考虑到护理机器人发展的早期阶段,实验环境有限,未来护理机器人在韩国护理环境中普及时,获得积极感知的可能性很大。本研究强调,在韩国的长期护理环境中应用护理技术之前,需要进行实际演示和全面培训,以提高护理人员对技术的接受程度。
Changes in Technology Acceptance of Smart Care Beds Among Long-Term Care Workers in Korea.
Objectives: This study investigates the changing perceptions of Korean care workers regarding a robotic bed designed to assist with repositioning and prevent pressure ulcers. With the primary aim of assessing the technology acceptance among care workers using the robotic bed to solve the problem of a shortage of care workers in Korea, we sought to examine the possibility of applying care robots in the field.
Methods: A total of 20 long-term care workers participated in the experiment, and their attitudes were measured before and after using the robot. Frequency analysis and paired t-tests were conducted using Stata 17 to analyze the data.
Results: The results show significant changes in the perceived ease of use (PEOU), facilitating conditions (FCs), and gerontology anxiety (GA), with the PEOU increasing by 19.87%, FC increasing by 20.63%, and GA decreasing by 17.2%. However, there was no significant change in the perceived usefulness (PU) and intention to use (IU).
Conclusions: The results showing that the perception of technology acceptance changed significantly mean that the use of the care robot means that there is a high possibility of positive perceptions in Korean care settings when care robots are distributed in the field in the future, considering that the experimental environment was limited due to the early stage of development of care robots. This study highlights the need for practical demonstrations and thorough training to improve technology acceptance among care workers before the application of care technology in the long-term care environment in South Korea.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.