一项多中心横断面分析,旨在评估布维伐他西坦在使用 BAEs-BREEZE 研究治疗部分发作性癫痫中的安全性和使用模式:事后分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1002/epi4.13065
Arvind Sharma, Krishnaprasad Korukonda, Amit Haldar, Usha Kant Misra, R V Anand, Yakshdeep Dave, Girish Kulkarni
{"title":"一项多中心横断面分析,旨在评估布维伐他西坦在使用 BAEs-BREEZE 研究治疗部分发作性癫痫中的安全性和使用模式:事后分析。","authors":"Arvind Sharma, Krishnaprasad Korukonda, Amit Haldar, Usha Kant Misra, R V Anand, Yakshdeep Dave, Girish Kulkarni","doi":"10.1002/epi4.13065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Brivaracetam (BRV), a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) offers strong conformational receptor domain binding, faster blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability and better tolerability making it potential therapeutic option as an initial line or initial line add-on strategy for focal onset seizure (FoS). The following study was planned to further understand the role and relevance of BRV in the real world settings of India.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a multicentric, cross-sectional, and non-interventional study conducted in patients with FoS across India. The study was approved by central independent ethics committee. Descriptive and analytical statistics employed using SPSS version 29.0.1.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Per protocol (PP) analysis included 8479 eligible patients from 1069 sites, gender; 5771 (68.06%) male and 2708 (31.94%) female with mean age 41.21 ± 12.74 years. Total 8019 (94.57%) patients had FoS and 460 (5.43%) patients had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCs). In FoS, 4105 (51.19%) patients switched from LEV to BRV whereas 3914 (48.81%) switched from other ASMs to BRV. BAEs accounted for 2059 (50.16%) patients in LEV to BRV switch versus 133 (3.39%) in other ASM to BRV switch. Post switch, LEV-associated BAEs reduced irrespective of being used as monotherapy 85.65% (p < 0.001) or as an adjuvant therapy 83.71% (p < 0.001) at BRV dosage of 50 to 100 mg BID. This RWE showed the utility of BRV as mono component as an initial add-on strategy in FoS cases.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>BRV remains a pertinent therapeutic choice for FoS for the treatment naïve and/or BAE cases. Exposure of LEV leads to considerable BAEs compared to patients without LEV exposure. Patients who switched to BRV due to LEV-induced BAEs significantly improved tolerability with BRV irrespective being used as monotherapy or as adjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Current study was planned to understand the clinical role and relevance of third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM), brivaracetam (BRV) in the real world settings of India. Outcome of the study highlighted that BRV is an emerging, potential and safe ASM treatment option for epilepsy in Indian context. Many patients with epilepsy who are not able to tolerate the other ASM including levetiracetam (LEV) primarily due to behavioral side effects improves tolerability post switch to BRV, additionally results are consistent either BRV being used as an adjuvant therapy or as monotherapy therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicenter, cross-sectional analysis to assess the safety and usage pattern of brivaracetam in the management of partial-onset seizure with BAEs-BREEZE study: A post-hoc analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arvind Sharma, Krishnaprasad Korukonda, Amit Haldar, Usha Kant Misra, R V Anand, Yakshdeep Dave, Girish Kulkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epi4.13065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Brivaracetam (BRV), a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) offers strong conformational receptor domain binding, faster blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability and better tolerability making it potential therapeutic option as an initial line or initial line add-on strategy for focal onset seizure (FoS). The following study was planned to further understand the role and relevance of BRV in the real world settings of India.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a multicentric, cross-sectional, and non-interventional study conducted in patients with FoS across India. The study was approved by central independent ethics committee. Descriptive and analytical statistics employed using SPSS version 29.0.1.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Per protocol (PP) analysis included 8479 eligible patients from 1069 sites, gender; 5771 (68.06%) male and 2708 (31.94%) female with mean age 41.21 ± 12.74 years. Total 8019 (94.57%) patients had FoS and 460 (5.43%) patients had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCs). In FoS, 4105 (51.19%) patients switched from LEV to BRV whereas 3914 (48.81%) switched from other ASMs to BRV. BAEs accounted for 2059 (50.16%) patients in LEV to BRV switch versus 133 (3.39%) in other ASM to BRV switch. Post switch, LEV-associated BAEs reduced irrespective of being used as monotherapy 85.65% (p < 0.001) or as an adjuvant therapy 83.71% (p < 0.001) at BRV dosage of 50 to 100 mg BID. This RWE showed the utility of BRV as mono component as an initial add-on strategy in FoS cases.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>BRV remains a pertinent therapeutic choice for FoS for the treatment naïve and/or BAE cases. Exposure of LEV leads to considerable BAEs compared to patients without LEV exposure. Patients who switched to BRV due to LEV-induced BAEs significantly improved tolerability with BRV irrespective being used as monotherapy or as adjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Current study was planned to understand the clinical role and relevance of third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM), brivaracetam (BRV) in the real world settings of India. Outcome of the study highlighted that BRV is an emerging, potential and safe ASM treatment option for epilepsy in Indian context. Many patients with epilepsy who are not able to tolerate the other ASM including levetiracetam (LEV) primarily due to behavioral side effects improves tolerability post switch to BRV, additionally results are consistent either BRV being used as an adjuvant therapy or as monotherapy therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.13065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.13065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:布里瓦西坦(Brivaracetam,BRV)是第三代抗癫痫药物(ASM),具有强大的构象受体结构域结合力、更快的血脑屏障(BBB)渗透性和更好的耐受性,使其成为治疗局灶性癫痫发作(FoS)的初始线或初始线附加策略的潜在治疗选择。以下研究旨在进一步了解 BRV 在印度现实环境中的作用和相关性:这是一项多中心、横断面、非干预性研究,对象是印度各地的 FoS 患者。该研究获得了中央独立伦理委员会的批准。采用 SPSS 29.0.1.0 版进行描述性和分析性统计:按方案(PP)分析包括来自 1069 个地点的 8479 名符合条件的患者,性别:男性 5771 人(68.06%),女性 2708 人(31.94%),平均年龄(41.21 ± 12.74)岁。共有 8019 名(94.57%)患者患有 FoS,460 名(5.43%)患者患有局灶性至双侧强直阵挛发作(FBTCs)。在 FoS 患者中,4105 人(51.19%)从 LEV 转为 BRV,3914 人(48.81%)从其他 ASM 转为 BRV。从 LEV 转为 BRV 的患者中有 2059 人(50.16%)出现 BAE,而从其他 ASM 转为 BRV 的患者中有 133 人(3.39%)出现 BAE。换药后,LEV 相关 BAEs 减少了 85.65%(p):对于治疗失败和/或BAE病例,BRV仍是治疗FoS的一个相关治疗选择。与未接触 LEV 的患者相比,接触 LEV 会导致相当多的 BAE。因 LEV 引起 BAE 而改用 BRV 的患者,无论作为单药治疗还是辅助治疗,对 BRV 的耐受性都有明显改善。白话摘要:目前的研究计划旨在了解第三代抗癫痫药物(ASM)--布利瓦西坦(BRV)在印度现实环境中的临床作用和相关性。研究结果表明,在印度,布利瓦西坦是一种新兴的、潜在的、安全的抗癫痫药物。许多癫痫患者无法耐受包括左乙拉西坦(LEV)在内的其他抗癫痫药物,主要是由于行为副作用,在改用 BRV 后,他们的耐受性得到了改善,此外,无论是将 BRV 用作辅助疗法还是单药疗法,结果都是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multicenter, cross-sectional analysis to assess the safety and usage pattern of brivaracetam in the management of partial-onset seizure with BAEs-BREEZE study: A post-hoc analysis.

Objective: Brivaracetam (BRV), a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) offers strong conformational receptor domain binding, faster blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability and better tolerability making it potential therapeutic option as an initial line or initial line add-on strategy for focal onset seizure (FoS). The following study was planned to further understand the role and relevance of BRV in the real world settings of India.

Method: This was a multicentric, cross-sectional, and non-interventional study conducted in patients with FoS across India. The study was approved by central independent ethics committee. Descriptive and analytical statistics employed using SPSS version 29.0.1.0.

Results: Per protocol (PP) analysis included 8479 eligible patients from 1069 sites, gender; 5771 (68.06%) male and 2708 (31.94%) female with mean age 41.21 ± 12.74 years. Total 8019 (94.57%) patients had FoS and 460 (5.43%) patients had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCs). In FoS, 4105 (51.19%) patients switched from LEV to BRV whereas 3914 (48.81%) switched from other ASMs to BRV. BAEs accounted for 2059 (50.16%) patients in LEV to BRV switch versus 133 (3.39%) in other ASM to BRV switch. Post switch, LEV-associated BAEs reduced irrespective of being used as monotherapy 85.65% (p < 0.001) or as an adjuvant therapy 83.71% (p < 0.001) at BRV dosage of 50 to 100 mg BID. This RWE showed the utility of BRV as mono component as an initial add-on strategy in FoS cases.

Significance: BRV remains a pertinent therapeutic choice for FoS for the treatment naïve and/or BAE cases. Exposure of LEV leads to considerable BAEs compared to patients without LEV exposure. Patients who switched to BRV due to LEV-induced BAEs significantly improved tolerability with BRV irrespective being used as monotherapy or as adjuvant therapy.

Plain language summary: Current study was planned to understand the clinical role and relevance of third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM), brivaracetam (BRV) in the real world settings of India. Outcome of the study highlighted that BRV is an emerging, potential and safe ASM treatment option for epilepsy in Indian context. Many patients with epilepsy who are not able to tolerate the other ASM including levetiracetam (LEV) primarily due to behavioral side effects improves tolerability post switch to BRV, additionally results are consistent either BRV being used as an adjuvant therapy or as monotherapy therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信