肺活量测定中的迁移学习:用于儿科人群自动流量-容积曲线质量控制的 CNN 模型。

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Carla Martins , Henrique Barros , André Moreira
{"title":"肺活量测定中的迁移学习:用于儿科人群自动流量-容积曲线质量控制的 CNN 模型。","authors":"Carla Martins ,&nbsp;Henrique Barros ,&nbsp;André Moreira","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Current spirometers face challenges in evaluating acceptability criteria, often requiring manual visual inspection by trained specialists. Automating this process could improve diagnostic workflows and reduce variability in test assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to apply transfer learning to convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automate the classification of spirometry flow-volume curves based on acceptability criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 5287 spirometry flow-volume curves were divided into three categories: (A) all criteria met, (B) early termination, and (C) non-acceptable results. Six CNN models (VGG16, InceptionV3, Xception, ResNet152V2, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121) were trained using a balanced dataset after data augmentation. The models' performance was evaluated on part of the original unbalanced dataset with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy at 93.9 %, while ResNet152V2 had the lowest at 83.0 %. Non-acceptable curves (Group C) were the easiest to classify, with precision reaching at least 87.7 %. Early termination curves (Group B) were the most challenging, with precision ranging from 75.0 % to 90.3 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CNN models, particularly VGG16, show promise in automating spirometry quality control, potentially reducing the need for manual inspection by specialized technicians. This approach can streamline spirometry assessments, offering consistent, high-quality diagnostics even in non-specialized or low-resource environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 109341"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfer learning in spirometry: CNN models for automated flow-volume curve quality control in paediatric populations\",\"authors\":\"Carla Martins ,&nbsp;Henrique Barros ,&nbsp;André Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Current spirometers face challenges in evaluating acceptability criteria, often requiring manual visual inspection by trained specialists. Automating this process could improve diagnostic workflows and reduce variability in test assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to apply transfer learning to convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automate the classification of spirometry flow-volume curves based on acceptability criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 5287 spirometry flow-volume curves were divided into three categories: (A) all criteria met, (B) early termination, and (C) non-acceptable results. Six CNN models (VGG16, InceptionV3, Xception, ResNet152V2, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121) were trained using a balanced dataset after data augmentation. The models' performance was evaluated on part of the original unbalanced dataset with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy at 93.9 %, while ResNet152V2 had the lowest at 83.0 %. Non-acceptable curves (Group C) were the easiest to classify, with precision reaching at least 87.7 %. Early termination curves (Group B) were the most challenging, with precision ranging from 75.0 % to 90.3 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CNN models, particularly VGG16, show promise in automating spirometry quality control, potentially reducing the need for manual inspection by specialized technicians. This approach can streamline spirometry assessments, offering consistent, high-quality diagnostics even in non-specialized or low-resource environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524014264\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524014264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:目前的肺活量计在评估可接受性标准方面面临挑战,通常需要训练有素的专家进行人工目测。目的:本研究旨在将迁移学习应用于卷积神经网络(CNN),根据可接受性标准对肺活量流量-容积曲线进行自动分类:共有 5287 条肺活量流速-容积曲线被分为三类:(A) 符合所有标准,(B) 提前终止,(C) 不可接受的结果。经过数据增强后,使用平衡数据集对六个 CNN 模型(VGG16、InceptionV3、Xception、ResNet152V2、InceptionResNetV2、DenseNet121)进行了训练。在部分原始非平衡数据集上对模型的性能进行了评估,评估指标包括准确度、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数:结果:VGG16 的准确率最高,为 93.9%,而 ResNet152V2 的准确率最低,为 83.0%。不可接受曲线(C 组)最容易分类,精确度至少达到 87.7%。早期终止曲线(B 组)最具挑战性,精确度从 75.0 % 到 90.3 % 不等:CNN模型,尤其是VGG16,有望实现肺活量质量控制的自动化,从而减少专业技术人员进行人工检查的需要。这种方法可以简化肺活量评估,即使在非专业或资源匮乏的环境中也能提供一致的高质量诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transfer learning in spirometry: CNN models for automated flow-volume curve quality control in paediatric populations

Problem

Current spirometers face challenges in evaluating acceptability criteria, often requiring manual visual inspection by trained specialists. Automating this process could improve diagnostic workflows and reduce variability in test assessments.

Aim

This study aimed to apply transfer learning to convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automate the classification of spirometry flow-volume curves based on acceptability criteria.

Methods

A total of 5287 spirometry flow-volume curves were divided into three categories: (A) all criteria met, (B) early termination, and (C) non-acceptable results. Six CNN models (VGG16, InceptionV3, Xception, ResNet152V2, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121) were trained using a balanced dataset after data augmentation. The models' performance was evaluated on part of the original unbalanced dataset with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.

Results

VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy at 93.9 %, while ResNet152V2 had the lowest at 83.0 %. Non-acceptable curves (Group C) were the easiest to classify, with precision reaching at least 87.7 %. Early termination curves (Group B) were the most challenging, with precision ranging from 75.0 % to 90.3 %.

Conclusion

CNN models, particularly VGG16, show promise in automating spirometry quality control, potentially reducing the need for manual inspection by specialized technicians. This approach can streamline spirometry assessments, offering consistent, high-quality diagnostics even in non-specialized or low-resource environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信