赞成:留置胸膜导管会对患者造成伤害。

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Breathe Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1183/20734735.0034-2024
Beenish Iqbal, Eihab Bedawi, Najib M Rahman
{"title":"赞成:留置胸膜导管会对患者造成伤害。","authors":"Beenish Iqbal, Eihab Bedawi, Najib M Rahman","doi":"10.1183/20734735.0034-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) tend to recur and require definitive treatment with either chest drain and talc pleurodesis or indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs), which offer similar symptomatic benefits. In recent years, IPCs have become popular due to the presumed convenience of an outpatient procedure followed by home drainage leading to a misconception of IPCs being an ideal treatment for MPE. However, IPCs predispose the patient to multiple complications and have significant physical and psychological implications that are under-recognised. Patients require additional clinical reviews, hospital admissions and treatment for these complications related to IPCs. Additionally, there is a huge psychological impact of living with a home catheter that is a constant reminder of their cancer and this has been shown to affect quality of life negatively. Hence, IPCs should not be considered the \"ideal\" treatment for MPE management and clinicians should reflect the equipoise of the evidence for the benefits and accurately reflect the adverse effects of IPCs in their discussions with patients to facilitate informed decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9292,"journal":{"name":"Breathe","volume":"20 3","pages":"240034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pro: indwelling pleural catheters cause harm to patients.\",\"authors\":\"Beenish Iqbal, Eihab Bedawi, Najib M Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/20734735.0034-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) tend to recur and require definitive treatment with either chest drain and talc pleurodesis or indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs), which offer similar symptomatic benefits. In recent years, IPCs have become popular due to the presumed convenience of an outpatient procedure followed by home drainage leading to a misconception of IPCs being an ideal treatment for MPE. However, IPCs predispose the patient to multiple complications and have significant physical and psychological implications that are under-recognised. Patients require additional clinical reviews, hospital admissions and treatment for these complications related to IPCs. Additionally, there is a huge psychological impact of living with a home catheter that is a constant reminder of their cancer and this has been shown to affect quality of life negatively. Hence, IPCs should not be considered the \\\"ideal\\\" treatment for MPE management and clinicians should reflect the equipoise of the evidence for the benefits and accurately reflect the adverse effects of IPCs in their discussions with patients to facilitate informed decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breathe\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"240034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555583/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breathe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0034-2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breathe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0034-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恶性胸腔积液(MPE)容易复发,需要采用胸腔引流和滑石粉胸膜穿刺术或留置胸膜导管(IPC)进行最终治疗,这两种治疗方法具有类似的对症治疗效果。近年来,留置胸膜导管因其门诊手术后在家引流的便利性而广受欢迎,导致人们误认为留置胸膜导管是治疗 MPE 的理想方法。然而,IPC 易使患者出现多种并发症,并对患者的身体和心理造成重大影响,而这些影响却未得到充分认识。患者需要额外的临床复查、住院和治疗这些与 IPC 相关的并发症。此外,家用导尿管时刻提醒患者他们身患癌症,这对患者的心理造成了巨大影响,事实证明这会对生活质量产生负面影响。因此,IPCs 不应被视为治疗 MPE 的 "理想 "疗法,临床医生在与患者讨论时应反映有关 IPCs 优点的证据,并准确反映 IPCs 的不良反应,以便患者在知情的情况下做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pro: indwelling pleural catheters cause harm to patients.

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) tend to recur and require definitive treatment with either chest drain and talc pleurodesis or indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs), which offer similar symptomatic benefits. In recent years, IPCs have become popular due to the presumed convenience of an outpatient procedure followed by home drainage leading to a misconception of IPCs being an ideal treatment for MPE. However, IPCs predispose the patient to multiple complications and have significant physical and psychological implications that are under-recognised. Patients require additional clinical reviews, hospital admissions and treatment for these complications related to IPCs. Additionally, there is a huge psychological impact of living with a home catheter that is a constant reminder of their cancer and this has been shown to affect quality of life negatively. Hence, IPCs should not be considered the "ideal" treatment for MPE management and clinicians should reflect the equipoise of the evidence for the benefits and accurately reflect the adverse effects of IPCs in their discussions with patients to facilitate informed decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breathe
Breathe RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信