异丙酚和丙泊酚在减轻 ERCP 麻醉过程中呼吸抑制的疗效比较:随机对照试验。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Juanhong Wang, Rui Wang, Xiaofang Ma, Wenjing Zhu, Baoping Zhang, Yuhu Ma, Yatao Liu
{"title":"异丙酚和丙泊酚在减轻 ERCP 麻醉过程中呼吸抑制的疗效比较:随机对照试验。","authors":"Juanhong Wang, Rui Wang, Xiaofang Ma, Wenjing Zhu, Baoping Zhang, Yuhu Ma, Yatao Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02791-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propofol is one of the important drug causes of respiratory depression in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) anesthesia. This study aims to clarify whether Ciprofol in ERCP anesthesia reduces the respiratory depression rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial performed at the Surgical Endoscopy Center, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University between Jun 01, 2022 and Feb 20, 2024, patients undergoing ERCP anesthesia were randomly assigned into ciprofol (study group) or propofol (control group). Primary outcomes included respiratory depression rate during anesthesia, and secondary outcomes included body movement and hypoxemia, awakening time, mean arterial pressure and heart rate changes at key points during surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 of the 306 patients had respiratory depression (6.5%). The frequency of respiratory depression was 3.3% in the group C and 9.8% in the group P, with a difference of 6.5% between the two groups (P = 0.035). Ciprofol anesthesia decreased the hyoxemia, injection pain, and circulation and heart rate fluctuations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that Propofol (OR 1.970; 95% CI, 1.121-3.461, P = 0.018), mallampati classification>II (OR 1.594; 95% CI, 1.129-2.249, P = 0.008), and fasting time>10.5 h (OR 3.184; 95% CI, 1.531-6.621, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for incidence of respiratory depression in ERCP anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients undergoing anesthesia for ERCP, Ciprofol, compared to Propofol, has been shown to effectively reduce the incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression, thereby enhancing the safety of the anesthesia process.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 15/01/2022 (ChiCTR2200055629).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of ciprofol and propofol in reducing respiratory depression during ERCP anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Juanhong Wang, Rui Wang, Xiaofang Ma, Wenjing Zhu, Baoping Zhang, Yuhu Ma, Yatao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-024-02791-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propofol is one of the important drug causes of respiratory depression in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) anesthesia. This study aims to clarify whether Ciprofol in ERCP anesthesia reduces the respiratory depression rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial performed at the Surgical Endoscopy Center, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University between Jun 01, 2022 and Feb 20, 2024, patients undergoing ERCP anesthesia were randomly assigned into ciprofol (study group) or propofol (control group). Primary outcomes included respiratory depression rate during anesthesia, and secondary outcomes included body movement and hypoxemia, awakening time, mean arterial pressure and heart rate changes at key points during surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 of the 306 patients had respiratory depression (6.5%). The frequency of respiratory depression was 3.3% in the group C and 9.8% in the group P, with a difference of 6.5% between the two groups (P = 0.035). Ciprofol anesthesia decreased the hyoxemia, injection pain, and circulation and heart rate fluctuations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that Propofol (OR 1.970; 95% CI, 1.121-3.461, P = 0.018), mallampati classification>II (OR 1.594; 95% CI, 1.129-2.249, P = 0.008), and fasting time>10.5 h (OR 3.184; 95% CI, 1.531-6.621, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for incidence of respiratory depression in ERCP anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients undergoing anesthesia for ERCP, Ciprofol, compared to Propofol, has been shown to effectively reduce the incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression, thereby enhancing the safety of the anesthesia process.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 15/01/2022 (ChiCTR2200055629).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546404/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02791-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02791-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:丙泊酚是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)麻醉中导致呼吸抑制的重要药物之一。本研究旨在明确异丙酚在ERCP麻醉中是否能降低呼吸抑制率:这项随机对照试验于2022年6月1日至2024年2月20日在兰州大学第一医院外科内镜中心进行,将接受ERCP麻醉的患者随机分为研究组(ciprofol)和对照组(propofol)。主要结果包括麻醉期间的呼吸抑制率,次要结果包括身体移动和低氧血症、苏醒时间、手术期间关键点的平均动脉压和心率变化。C 组呼吸抑制发生率为 3.3%,P 组为 9.8%,两组间差异为 6.5%(P = 0.035)。环丙酚麻醉可减少低氧血症、注射疼痛、循环和心率波动。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,丙泊酚(OR 1.970;95% CI,1.121-3.461,P = 0.018)、mallampati分级>II(OR 1.594;95% CI,1.129-2.249,P = 0.008)和空腹时间>10.5 h(OR 3.184;95% CI,1.531-6.621,P = 0.002)是ERCP麻醉中呼吸抑制发生率的独立风险因素:结论:对于接受ERCP麻醉的患者,与丙泊酚相比,异丙酚可有效降低术中呼吸抑制的发生率,从而提高麻醉过程的安全性:本研究于2022年1月15日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2200055629)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of ciprofol and propofol in reducing respiratory depression during ERCP anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Propofol is one of the important drug causes of respiratory depression in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) anesthesia. This study aims to clarify whether Ciprofol in ERCP anesthesia reduces the respiratory depression rate.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial performed at the Surgical Endoscopy Center, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University between Jun 01, 2022 and Feb 20, 2024, patients undergoing ERCP anesthesia were randomly assigned into ciprofol (study group) or propofol (control group). Primary outcomes included respiratory depression rate during anesthesia, and secondary outcomes included body movement and hypoxemia, awakening time, mean arterial pressure and heart rate changes at key points during surgery.

Results: 20 of the 306 patients had respiratory depression (6.5%). The frequency of respiratory depression was 3.3% in the group C and 9.8% in the group P, with a difference of 6.5% between the two groups (P = 0.035). Ciprofol anesthesia decreased the hyoxemia, injection pain, and circulation and heart rate fluctuations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that Propofol (OR 1.970; 95% CI, 1.121-3.461, P = 0.018), mallampati classification>II (OR 1.594; 95% CI, 1.129-2.249, P = 0.008), and fasting time>10.5 h (OR 3.184; 95% CI, 1.531-6.621, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for incidence of respiratory depression in ERCP anesthesia.

Conclusions: For patients undergoing anesthesia for ERCP, Ciprofol, compared to Propofol, has been shown to effectively reduce the incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression, thereby enhancing the safety of the anesthesia process.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 15/01/2022 (ChiCTR2200055629).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信