COVID-19 大流行期间私营部门的结核病护理质量:对尼日利亚城市地区遵守国家结核病指南情况的重复横断面标准化患者研究。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Angelina Sassi, Lauren Rosapep, Bolanle Olusola Faleye, Elaine Baruwa, Benjamin Johns, Md Abdullah Heel Kafi, Lavanya Huria, Nathaly Aguilera Vasquez, Benjamin Daniels, Jishnu Das, Chukwuma Anyaike, Obioma Chijioke-Akaniro, Madhukar Pai, Charity Oga-Omenka
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间私营部门的结核病护理质量:对尼日利亚城市地区遵守国家结核病指南情况的重复横断面标准化患者研究。","authors":"Angelina Sassi, Lauren Rosapep, Bolanle Olusola Faleye, Elaine Baruwa, Benjamin Johns, Md Abdullah Heel Kafi, Lavanya Huria, Nathaly Aguilera Vasquez, Benjamin Daniels, Jishnu Das, Chukwuma Anyaike, Obioma Chijioke-Akaniro, Madhukar Pai, Charity Oga-Omenka","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Only a third of tuberculosis (TB) cases in Nigeria in 2020 were diagnosed and notified, in part due to low detection and under-reporting from the private health sector. Using a standardised patient (SP) survey approach, we assessed how management of presumptive TB in the private sector aligns with national guidelines and whether this differed from a study conducted before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. 13 SPs presented a presumptive TB case to 511 private providers in urban areas of Lagos and Kano states in May and June 2021. Private provider case management was compared with national guidelines divided into three main steps: SP questioned about cough duration; sputum collection attempted for TB testing; and non-prescription of anti-TB medications, antibiotics and steroids. SP visits conducted in May-June 2021 were directly compared to SP visits conducted in the same areas in June-July 2019. Overall, 28% of interactions (145 of 511, 95% CI 24.5% to 32.5%) were correctly managed according to Nigerian guidelines, as few providers completed all three necessary steps. Providers in 71% of visits asked about cough duration (362 of 511, 95% CI 66.7% to 74.7%), 35% tested or recommended a sputum test (181 of 511, 95% CI 31.3% to 39.8%) and 79% avoided prescribing or dispensing unnecessary medications (406 of 511, 95% CI 75.6% to 82.8%). COVID-19 related questions were asked in only 2.4% (12 of 511, 95% CI 1.3% to 4.2%) of visits. During the COVID-19 pandemic, few providers completed all steps of the national guidelines. Providers performed better on individual steps, particularly asking about symptoms and avoiding prescription of harmful medications. Comparing visits conducted before and during the COVID-19 pandemic showed that COVID-19 did not significantly change the quality of TB care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private sector tuberculosis care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional standardised patients study of adherence to national TB guidelines in urban Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"Angelina Sassi, Lauren Rosapep, Bolanle Olusola Faleye, Elaine Baruwa, Benjamin Johns, Md Abdullah Heel Kafi, Lavanya Huria, Nathaly Aguilera Vasquez, Benjamin Daniels, Jishnu Das, Chukwuma Anyaike, Obioma Chijioke-Akaniro, Madhukar Pai, Charity Oga-Omenka\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Only a third of tuberculosis (TB) cases in Nigeria in 2020 were diagnosed and notified, in part due to low detection and under-reporting from the private health sector. Using a standardised patient (SP) survey approach, we assessed how management of presumptive TB in the private sector aligns with national guidelines and whether this differed from a study conducted before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. 13 SPs presented a presumptive TB case to 511 private providers in urban areas of Lagos and Kano states in May and June 2021. Private provider case management was compared with national guidelines divided into three main steps: SP questioned about cough duration; sputum collection attempted for TB testing; and non-prescription of anti-TB medications, antibiotics and steroids. SP visits conducted in May-June 2021 were directly compared to SP visits conducted in the same areas in June-July 2019. Overall, 28% of interactions (145 of 511, 95% CI 24.5% to 32.5%) were correctly managed according to Nigerian guidelines, as few providers completed all three necessary steps. Providers in 71% of visits asked about cough duration (362 of 511, 95% CI 66.7% to 74.7%), 35% tested or recommended a sputum test (181 of 511, 95% CI 31.3% to 39.8%) and 79% avoided prescribing or dispensing unnecessary medications (406 of 511, 95% CI 75.6% to 82.8%). COVID-19 related questions were asked in only 2.4% (12 of 511, 95% CI 1.3% to 4.2%) of visits. During the COVID-19 pandemic, few providers completed all steps of the national guidelines. Providers performed better on individual steps, particularly asking about symptoms and avoiding prescription of harmful medications. Comparing visits conducted before and during the COVID-19 pandemic showed that COVID-19 did not significantly change the quality of TB care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575386/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015474\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020 年,尼日利亚只有三分之一的肺结核(TB)病例得到诊断和通报,部分原因是私立医疗机构的检测率低和报告不足。我们采用标准化患者(SP)调查方法,评估了私营部门对推定肺结核的管理与国家指导方针的一致性,以及与 COVID-19 大流行开始前进行的一项研究相比是否存在差异。2021 年 5 月和 6 月,13 位 SP 向拉各斯州和卡诺州城市地区的 511 家私营医疗机构提供了推定肺结核病例。私营医疗机构的病例管理与国家指导方针进行了比较,分为三个主要步骤:SP 询问咳嗽持续时间;尝试收集痰液进行结核病检测;以及不开具抗结核药物、抗生素和类固醇处方。2021 年 5 月至 6 月进行的 SP 访问与 2019 年 6 月至 7 月在相同地区进行的 SP 访问进行了直接比较。总体而言,28%的互动(511 次中有 145 次,95% CI 为 24.5% 至 32.5%)是根据尼日利亚指南正确处理的,因为很少有医疗服务提供者完成了所有三个必要步骤。在 71% 的就诊中,医疗服务提供者询问了咳嗽持续时间(511 人中有 362 人,95% CI 为 66.7% 至 74.7%),35% 的医疗服务提供者进行了痰液检测或建议进行痰液检测(511 人中有 181 人,95% CI 为 31.3% 至 39.8%),79% 的医疗服务提供者避免开具或配发不必要的药物(511 人中有 406 人,95% CI 为 75.6% 至 82.8%)。只有 2.4% 的就诊者(511 人中有 12 人,95% CI 为 1.3% 至 4.2%)询问了与 COVID-19 相关的问题。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,几乎没有医疗服务提供者完成国家指南的所有步骤。医疗服务提供者在个别步骤上表现较好,尤其是询问症状和避免开具有害药物处方。比较 COVID-19 流行之前和流行期间的就诊情况表明,COVID-19 并未显著改变结核病护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private sector tuberculosis care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional standardised patients study of adherence to national TB guidelines in urban Nigeria.

Only a third of tuberculosis (TB) cases in Nigeria in 2020 were diagnosed and notified, in part due to low detection and under-reporting from the private health sector. Using a standardised patient (SP) survey approach, we assessed how management of presumptive TB in the private sector aligns with national guidelines and whether this differed from a study conducted before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. 13 SPs presented a presumptive TB case to 511 private providers in urban areas of Lagos and Kano states in May and June 2021. Private provider case management was compared with national guidelines divided into three main steps: SP questioned about cough duration; sputum collection attempted for TB testing; and non-prescription of anti-TB medications, antibiotics and steroids. SP visits conducted in May-June 2021 were directly compared to SP visits conducted in the same areas in June-July 2019. Overall, 28% of interactions (145 of 511, 95% CI 24.5% to 32.5%) were correctly managed according to Nigerian guidelines, as few providers completed all three necessary steps. Providers in 71% of visits asked about cough duration (362 of 511, 95% CI 66.7% to 74.7%), 35% tested or recommended a sputum test (181 of 511, 95% CI 31.3% to 39.8%) and 79% avoided prescribing or dispensing unnecessary medications (406 of 511, 95% CI 75.6% to 82.8%). COVID-19 related questions were asked in only 2.4% (12 of 511, 95% CI 1.3% to 4.2%) of visits. During the COVID-19 pandemic, few providers completed all steps of the national guidelines. Providers performed better on individual steps, particularly asking about symptoms and avoiding prescription of harmful medications. Comparing visits conducted before and during the COVID-19 pandemic showed that COVID-19 did not significantly change the quality of TB care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信