应对癌痛:斯里兰卡癌症患者疼痛感知和自我应对策略的定性研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
N P Edirisinghe, P T R Makuloluwa, Thamara Amarasekara, C S E Goonewardena
{"title":"应对癌痛:斯里兰卡癌症患者疼痛感知和自我应对策略的定性研究。","authors":"N P Edirisinghe, P T R Makuloluwa, Thamara Amarasekara, C S E Goonewardena","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain is one of the most debilitating symptoms of cancer, substantially diminishing one's quality of life. The level of pain experienced is eventually determined by the pain coping strategies adopted by patients individually. The awareness of the 'self-coping methods of pain' of individual patients would be beneficial for the multidisciplinary pain team to consider such methods when planning future interventions to manage pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores the pain perception and coping strategies used by patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pain management unit, Apeksha Hospital, Maharagama, Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study was conducted among purposively selected patients with cancer and registered at the pain management unit. 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted until data saturation. Data were analysed using Graneheim and Lundman's content analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants were between 51 and 60 years old and identified as Sinhalese Buddhists. The study's findings revealed two subthemes under 'Understanding pain', namely 'Physical and emotional impact' and 'Cultural and spiritual interpretations', and five subthemes under 'Coping strategies for living with pain', namely 'Medication and self-control', 'Seeking spiritual support', 'Receiving social support', 'Exploring alternative treatments' and 'Adapting daily life'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coping strategies were adopted especially in achieving essential life aspirations and participating in preferred activities. Goals or activities were often adjusted to fall within their health limits. Acceptance and progress in life were considered more important than pain control. We recommend giving due consideration to the 'self-coping strategies' of individual patients in designing interventions to mitigate cancer pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coping with cancer pain: a qualitative study to explore pain perception and self-coping strategies of patients with cancer in Sri Lanka.\",\"authors\":\"N P Edirisinghe, P T R Makuloluwa, Thamara Amarasekara, C S E Goonewardena\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pain is one of the most debilitating symptoms of cancer, substantially diminishing one's quality of life. The level of pain experienced is eventually determined by the pain coping strategies adopted by patients individually. The awareness of the 'self-coping methods of pain' of individual patients would be beneficial for the multidisciplinary pain team to consider such methods when planning future interventions to manage pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores the pain perception and coping strategies used by patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pain management unit, Apeksha Hospital, Maharagama, Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study was conducted among purposively selected patients with cancer and registered at the pain management unit. 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted until data saturation. Data were analysed using Graneheim and Lundman's content analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants were between 51 and 60 years old and identified as Sinhalese Buddhists. The study's findings revealed two subthemes under 'Understanding pain', namely 'Physical and emotional impact' and 'Cultural and spiritual interpretations', and five subthemes under 'Coping strategies for living with pain', namely 'Medication and self-control', 'Seeking spiritual support', 'Receiving social support', 'Exploring alternative treatments' and 'Adapting daily life'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coping strategies were adopted especially in achieving essential life aspirations and participating in preferred activities. Goals or activities were often adjusted to fall within their health limits. Acceptance and progress in life were considered more important than pain control. We recommend giving due consideration to the 'self-coping strategies' of individual patients in designing interventions to mitigate cancer pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085510\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疼痛是癌症最令人沮丧的症状之一,会大大降低患者的生活质量。疼痛的程度最终取决于患者各自采取的疼痛应对策略。了解个别患者的 "疼痛自我应对方法 "将有助于多学科疼痛团队在规划未来疼痛管理干预措施时考虑这些方法:本研究探讨了斯里兰卡癌痛患者的疼痛感知和应对策略:设计:描述性定性研究:地点:斯里兰卡马哈拉加马Apeksha医院疼痛管理科:研究对象:有目的性地选择在疼痛治疗科登记的癌症患者。共进行了 21 次半结构式访谈,直至数据饱和。采用 Graneheim 和 Lundman 的内容分析法对数据进行了分析:大多数参与者的年龄在 51 至 60 岁之间,自认为是僧伽罗佛教徒。研究结果显示了 "了解疼痛 "下的两个次主题,即 "身体和情绪影响 "和 "文化和精神解释",以及 "与疼痛共存的应对策略 "下的五个次主题,即 "药物治疗和自我控制"、"寻求精神支持"、"接受社会支持"、"探索替代疗法 "和 "适应日常生活":在实现基本生活愿望和参与喜欢的活动方面,采取的应对策略尤为重要。目标或活动往往在其健康限制范围内进行调整。接受和生活进步被认为比控制疼痛更重要。我们建议在设计减轻癌痛的干预措施时,适当考虑患者的 "自我应对策略"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coping with cancer pain: a qualitative study to explore pain perception and self-coping strategies of patients with cancer in Sri Lanka.

Pain is one of the most debilitating symptoms of cancer, substantially diminishing one's quality of life. The level of pain experienced is eventually determined by the pain coping strategies adopted by patients individually. The awareness of the 'self-coping methods of pain' of individual patients would be beneficial for the multidisciplinary pain team to consider such methods when planning future interventions to manage pain.

Objectives: This study explores the pain perception and coping strategies used by patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka.

Design: A descriptive qualitative study.

Setting: Pain management unit, Apeksha Hospital, Maharagama, Sri Lanka.

Participants: The study was conducted among purposively selected patients with cancer and registered at the pain management unit. 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted until data saturation. Data were analysed using Graneheim and Lundman's content analysis method.

Results: Most participants were between 51 and 60 years old and identified as Sinhalese Buddhists. The study's findings revealed two subthemes under 'Understanding pain', namely 'Physical and emotional impact' and 'Cultural and spiritual interpretations', and five subthemes under 'Coping strategies for living with pain', namely 'Medication and self-control', 'Seeking spiritual support', 'Receiving social support', 'Exploring alternative treatments' and 'Adapting daily life'.

Conclusion: Coping strategies were adopted especially in achieving essential life aspirations and participating in preferred activities. Goals or activities were often adjusted to fall within their health limits. Acceptance and progress in life were considered more important than pain control. We recommend giving due consideration to the 'self-coping strategies' of individual patients in designing interventions to mitigate cancer pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信